New age of the Lantian Homo erectus cranium extending to about 1.63 million years ago

November 28, 2014
The cranium of Lantian Homo erectus. Credit: HUANG Weiwen

According to paper published online November 20 in the Journal of Human Evolution, the age of the Lantian Homo erectus cranium from Gongwangling, Lantian County, Shaanxi Province, China, is likely half a million years older than previously thought. Earlier estimates dated this important fossil, which was found in 1964, to 1.15 million years ago. A research team of Chinese and British scientists, have provided compelling evidence that the fossil should be dated to 1.63 million years ago, making it the oldest fossil hominin cranium known in northeast Asia, and the second oldest site with cranial remains outside Africa. Only the Dmanisi crania from Georgia that, like Lantian, are relatively small-brained, are older, at around 1.75 million years old.

The new date for the Lantian cranium provides good evidence that small-brained hominins moved rapidly eastwards in a warm period just after 1.75 million years ago. The presence of fossils much further south, in Indonesia, that are only slightly younger (c. 1.5 – 1.6 million years ago), also opens up the possibility that hominins followed northern and southern dispersal routes from Africa into Asia.

The research team, of scientists from the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry of Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Exeter in United Kingdom and the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology of Chinese Academy of Sciences (IVPP), led by Professors ZHU Zhaoyu, Robin Dennell and HUANG Weiwen used a range of methods including loess-palaeosol stratigraphy, tectonic-geomorphology, sedimentology and mineralogy, geochemistry, palaeontology, paleomagnetism and rock magnetic methods to re-date the skull. Over 12 years (2001–2013) of research, they investigated some key geological sections by using high-resolution sampling, such as the Gongwangling and Jiacun sections in the Lantian basin of North China immediately north of the Qinling Mountains, and measured thousands of samples.

Based on reference and analysis of previous literature, four lines of new evidence from this research have been established to support a re-dating of the Gongwangling hominin from 1.15 to ca. 1.63 million years ago. First, the fossiliferous horizon cannot be attributed, as previously thought, to the 15th loess unit (L15), but lies below L15 and an underlying erosional surface, and there is therefore a stratigraphic break between L15 and the hominin horizon. Second, the fossil horizon is situated between the Gilsa Event (average age c. 1.62 million years ago) and the Olduvai Subchron (top age 1.77 million years ago) of the geomagnetic zones in the section, and thus the fossil horizon should correspond to the 22-23rd palaeosol units (S22~S23). Thirdly, the same type of subtropical faunal assemblage was found at both the Gongwangling sections and at Jiacun, and in the same stratigraphic position, i.e., S22–S23, between the Gilsa Event and the Olduvai Subchron. Fourthly, based on the palaeomagnetic time scale and the astronomical timescale of the Chinese loess-paleosol sequence, the age of the horizon of the Gongwangling fossil cranium should be about 1.63 million years ago, which was also a warm climatic period.

"This age is consistent with the geological context and the subtropical fossil fauna at Gongwangling, and also the small-brain size of the Gongwangling Homo erectus cranium, similar to that seen in Georgia and Indonesia", said HUANG Weiwen, a professor of the IVPP in Beijing.

"The revised age extends its age by about half a million years and makes the Gongwangling site a crucial benchmark in establishing the framework of the origin, migration and dispersal of early man in the Old World", said Robin Dennell of University of Exeter in United Kingdom, "It also provides reasonable evidence for re-evaluating the status of other early and controversial human fossils in China and Java. In addition, this new research rewrites the history of the Lantian hominin and provides additional knowledge of for the public".

The new dating of the Gongwangling cranium is a multi-disciplinary research based on the fine correlation between the Chinese loess strata (the loess-palaeosol sequence over a period of 2.5 million year) and marine oxygen isotope stages, and the results demonstrate again that the Chinese loess-palaeosol sequence should and will play an important role in studies of Quaternary global change and early human evolution over the last two million years.

This research was mainly supported by the National Basic Research Program of China and the Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS.

Explore further: New palaeolithic artifacts discovered from loess deposits of Lantian, Central China

Related Stories

Researchers discover rare fossil ape cranium in China

September 6, 2013

A team of researchers has discovered the cranium of a fossil ape from Shuitangba, a Miocene site in Yunnan Province, China. The juvenile cranium of the fossil ape Lufengpithecus is significant, according to team member Nina ...

Recommended for you

Plague likely a Stone Age arrival to central Europe

November 22, 2017

A team of researchers led by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History has sequenced the first six European genomes of the plague-causing bacterium Yersinia pestis dating from the Late Neolithic ...

How to cut your lawn for grasshoppers

November 22, 2017

Picture a grasshopper landing randomly on a lawn of fixed area. If it then jumps a certain distance in a random direction, what shape should the lawn be to maximise the chance that the grasshopper stays on the lawn after ...

Ancient barley took high road to China

November 21, 2017

First domesticated 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East, wheat and barley took vastly different routes to China, with barley switching from a winter to both a winter and summer crop during a thousand-year ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (7) Nov 28, 2014
Kent,
Your new here, and so far, I've been entertained by your hoo-ha mental condition. However, don't carry on for too long elst the dino's will be comin' for YOU...
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (4) Nov 29, 2014
I think kent is a straight up troll at this point. At first I thought maybe he was just another julianpenrod who happened to speak English as a second or third language but the more he posts the more Im thinking he is most likely fairly sane and getting a kick out of posting what he knows is a bunch of babble on here.
bubsir
5 / 5 (5) Nov 29, 2014
Ren82, from what I read that is exactly the point. They studied not just the fossil, but where it came from to combine evidence and improve the dating.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (6) Nov 29, 2014
Wonderful! More confirmation that humans (if we go after the Dmanisi papers of Erectus variation as large as earlier and later Homo) or at least hominins were good travelers. And making Asia a cohesive hominin habitat at the time.

Also, quite an achievement to make that much sense of (wind blown) loess soil sediments. Dating methods have almost always been good, but modern microanalysis and data combination methods makes them extremely good. I'm reminded of that it took 6 years to recover the factual date of our oldest mineral grain, of the 4.4 billion year oldest Jack Hill zircon, but the returns are always tremendous. (Here making Asia/Erectus a more cohesive data field. There establishing firmly that the early Earth was cold and wet enough for the early emergence of life that other dating methods see, such as molecular dating of the earliest Bacteria/Archaea split.)
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (6) Nov 29, 2014
It gets better! The site is right north of the Qinling Mountains, which are a geographical dividing line between north and south China. [ http://www.china-...hina.htm ]

"Shaanxi Province is near the geographical centre of China and is certainly one of the oldest centres of Chinese civilization." [ http://www.sacu.o...nxi.html ]

Cohesivity. This find is marinated in it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.