'Getting-by girls' straddle gap between academic winners and losers

Everyone notices the academic superstars and failures, but what about the tens of millions of American teens straddling these two extremes? A new study from the University of California, Berkeley, has spotlighted a high school subculture that has made an art of slacking – even with ample educational resources – and may be destined to perpetuate the nation's struggling lower-middle class.

UC Berkeley sociologist Michele Rossi studied white in their last year of a well-funded . What she found was a group she dubbed "getting-by ," whose coping strategies include paying attention in class, placating teachers and other authority figures, copying one another's schoolwork or cheating, avoiding challenges and bringing home B-average report cards.

But while getting-by girls put in just enough effort to meet the demands of schoolwork, athletics, school clubs and partying, their practice of sufficing keeps them from making the most of the academic resources at their disposal. The U.S. National Assessment of Educational Progress shows that reading, math and social science scores among 17-year-olds have flatlined since the 1980s while scores among and elementary students have risen. Peer groups and school culture are said to have a major impact on academic achievement, particularly in high school, and Rossi's two-year investigation reinforces this dynamic.

"These girls under-perform academically not because they lack ability, or self-esteem, or good teachers," said Rossi, who will present her findings Aug. 16 at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in San Francisco. "They under-perform because their white lower middle-class culture values sociability, and doing enough to have enough. In a high school context, this culture clashes with an upper-middle class culture that prizes striving and individual advancement."

Rossi's findings come at a time when political attention and resources, as well as media coverage, are sharply focused on the educational needs of low-income, at-risk students on the one hand, and the more affluent, highly competitive students (and their parents) vying for spots in top-ranking universities on the other.

They also provide a rare insight into the attitudes and aspirations of the children of America's struggling lower-middle class. A recent report by the Hamilton Project found that lower-middle-class families are more likely to be headed by two-income married couples, with at least one parent having attended college, but who still face many of the same financial insecurities as those living in poverty.

Looking at "how class differences shape young white women's aspirations and strategies for social mobility," Rossi interviewed 56 girls in the 12th grade of a racially and socio-economically diverse East Coast public high school. She also interviewed 30 of their mothers. At that time, the school district's per-pupil spending was $13,000, higher than today's national average per-pupil spending of $11,000.

Parents of the getting-by girls typically held mid-level positions in a large company or ran small, independent businesses. By contrast, the upper-middle-class parents of the students referred to as "overachievers" were professionals or executives who held advanced and/or bachelor's degrees from a selective institution, and the working class or poor parents of the under-achievers, referred to in the study as "nowhere kids," had a or GED at best.

Defining themselves as "regular kids" or "slackers," the getting-by girls distanced themselves from the privileged, competitive overachievers they refer to as "AP kids," "honors kids" and "dorks," (and whom they consider pushy, uptight or neurotic) and the low-income, low-performing students they refer to as "losers," "burnouts" or "kids who act ghetto." That does not mean, however, that they occupy higher moral ground.

"Getting-by girls are good kids who do not get into trouble. Their teachers, coaches, school administrators and school staff like them. Their friends' parents like them," the study says. "However this does not mean that all getting- by girls always follow the rules … Rather when they do violate rules or expectations or defy authority, they do not get caught."

Next, Rossi, a doctoral student in sociology at UC Berkeley, plans to follow up with the getting-by girls she studied to see how they have fared in the wake of the Great Recession of 2007-09, and if their attitudes and aspirations have changed in the face of a more competitive employment market.

"The getting-by girls' emphasis on fun and cultivating social ties is appealing, as is their resistance to the cut-throat competitiveness and pursuit of self-interest they see among their 'overachiever' peers," Rossi said. "However, in an increasingly polarized job market, where educational attainment – particularly in STEM fields – is the key to 'good' jobs, it is not clear there is a place for them."

Explore further

Extra time in math class has its minuses, scholar says

Citation: 'Getting-by girls' straddle gap between academic winners and losers (2014, August 17) retrieved 21 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-08-getting-by-girls-straddle-gap-academic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 17, 2014
This is a great indication of conformist social values and teen disrespect for them.
Only those willing to work over long hours, spout fashionable buzz words at meetings and kiss the bosses a**e push themselves through the academic machine.

Aug 17, 2014
Let's hope these girls will be able to get by on minimum wage jobs at McD's or Walmart when they grow up and start popping out welfare brats.

Aug 18, 2014
Dan I think you have misinterpreted the results. These girls are more likely to become future soccer mums, hairdressers, coffee shop owners, internet home business creators, Avon or Amway ladies, social workers nursers, etc etc etc

Aug 18, 2014
and doing enough to have enough

Mightbe a bit heretic, but: what's wrong with that?
Why stress yourself for more when you know what's enough to guarantee you a carefree life? Especially if you value things other than academic achievements and bling?

Not everyone needs to be an academic. As long as they get enough out of their education to make informed decisions then I see no problem with such an attitude.

The thing that should be provided (and currently isn't) is a means to easily reenter an academic track if one finds, later in life, that one's priorities have changed.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more