Supercritical fluids explained

May 26, 2014 by John Proctor, The Conversation
Ethane in three forms: subcritical, critical and supercritical. Credit: Dr. Sven Horstmann, CC BY

When we boil a kettle, we observe what scientists call a phase transition: the water changes from being a liquid to a gas as water becomes less dense. One litre of water boils to give about 1,000 litres of steam at atmospheric pressure.

But what if we tried to boil the water at high pressure instead? If we squeezed the water to 1,000 times and then tried to boil it?

Until very recently, scientists have been quite clear in their expectations about this. If you squeezed water to 1,000 times atmospheric pressure and then heated it while keeping the pressure on, you would no longer observe boiling as such. The water molecules would whizz around with more energy, and the density would gradually go down, but there would be no boiling. At no point would the water undergo a sudden transition from being a to being a gas. Water (or any other material) under these conditions is called a supercritical fluid.

The conditions of 1,000 atmospheres pressure and 500°C may seem exotic, but to nature this is pretty everyday stuff. Drop a few hundred kilometres into the atmosphere of Uranus, Neptune, Jupiter or Saturn and that is exactly what it is like. On Earth we use supercritical fluids widely in the food, chemical and power industries in everyday processes such as decaffeinating coffee.

Russian endeavour

Historically, our understanding of liquids and supercritical fluids has involved treating them like a gas, but with a few tweaks. However, in the 1930s Russian physicist Yakov Ilyich Frenkel was reflecting on the fact that the density of liquids is much closer to solids than that of gases. Surely then, Frenkel thought, it would be beneficial to understand liquids using some concepts from our understanding of solids?

While liquids and solids are similar in terms of density there are also some major differences – particularly in the amount of disorder. In most solids the atoms occupy regular positions in what physicists call a crystal lattice, a bit like pool balls racked up ready to break or Ferrero Rocher piled high on a plate. In liquids however, the positions of the atoms are nearly random.

Frenkel's work resulted in a book, the Kinetic Theory of Liquids, which was written in difficult conditions at the height of World War II. In it, Frenkel takes then recently developed quantum mechanical ideas to describe solids, and applies them instead to liquids.

At the time, Frenkel's ideas on this subject were ignored by the wider scientific community. Not because they were felt to be wrong, but simply because they were difficult to prove or disprove experimentally. As Frenkel noted in the book, "the realization of high positive pressures and the investigation of…bodies under such pressures has been no easy task". But now there has been a revival of interest in Frenkel's work. Why has it taken so long to explore the consequences of Frenkel's ideas?

When Frenkel wrote Kinetic Theory of Liquids, high-pressure science was in its infancy. Nowadays, however, the situation is quite different. We can now generate 1,000 atmospheres of pressure quite easily and make useful experimental measurements on materials under those conditions.

Drawing lines

Based on these studies, physicists have recently predicted that there may be no such thing as a supercritical fluid after all. Even at arbitrarily , there will always be some firm dividing line between a gas and a liquid – dubbed the Frenkel Line.

If this prediction is correct then if we were to squeeze (or any other liquid) to 1,000 times atmospheric pressure and then heat it, we would still be able to see a sudden change between a liquid-like and a gas-like state, with some subtle but important changes in the properties of the material.

The implication here is that if the commonly used supercritical fluids are not what physicists thought them to be, then we might be able to find other interesting properties that could be exploited. After nearly a century of being sure, physicists will now have to rethink how to interpret supercritical fluids.

Explore further: Starting fire with water

Related Stories

Starting fire with water

January 13, 2014

When firefighters want to extinguish a blaze, they often douse it with water. Astronauts on board the ISS, however, are experimenting with a form of water that does the opposite. Instead of stopping fire, this water helps ...

New research could improve pharmaceuticals testing

April 30, 2014

A UT Arlington chemistry professor, renowned for his work in the area of chemical separations, is leading an effort to find a more accurate way to measure water content in pharmaceuticals – a major quality issue for drug ...

Rounding up the BCATs on the Space Station

May 13, 2014

Although it may not be herding cats exactly, all the NASA-supported Binary Colloidal Alloy Tests (BCAT) studies have ended on the International Space Station, and the experimental samples are being rounded up and returned ...

Re-thinking an alien world

January 16, 2012

Forty light years from Earth, a rocky world named "55 Cancri e" circles perilously close to a stellar inferno.  Completing one orbit in only 18 hours, the alien planet is 26 times closer to its parent star than Mercury ...

Recommended for you

Physicists discover new class of pentaquarks

March 26, 2019

Tomasz Skwarnicki, professor of physics in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University, has uncovered new information about a class of particles called pentaquarks. His findings could lead to a new understanding ...

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.