Misleading mineral may have resulted in overestimate of water in moon

Misleading mineral may have resulted in overestimate of water in moon
The image is a map of calcium within a polished thin slice of a lunar rock. The high calcium content in apatite is indicated by the bright pinks and reds, while surrounding minerals with lower calcium content are shown in blues and black. Core to rim zoning of water in crystals such as this one demonstrates the presence of the apatite fractionation, an effect responsible for the high water content of lunar apatites on an otherwise dry moon.

The amount of water present in the moon may have been overestimated by scientists studying the mineral apatite, says a team of researchers led by Jeremy Boyce of the UCLA Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences.

Boyce and his colleagues created a computer model to accurately predict how would have crystallized from cooling bodies of lunar magma early in the 's history. Their simulations revealed that the unusually hydrogen-rich apatite crystals observed in many lunar rock samples may not have formed within a -rich environment, as was originally expected.

This discovery has overturned the long-held assumption that the hydrogen in apatite is a good indicator of overall lunar .

"The mineral apatite is the most widely used method for estimating the amount of water in lunar rocks, but it cannot be trusted," said Boyce, who is an adjunct assistant professor in the UCLA College of Letters and Science. "Our new results show that there is not as much water in as apatite would have us believe."

The research was published online March 20 in the journal Science on and will be published in a future print edition.

For decades, scientists believed the moon was almost entirely devoid of water. However, the discovery of hydrogen-rich apatite within lunar rocks in 2010 seemed to hint at a more watery past. Scientists originally assumed that information obtained from a small sample of apatite could predict the original water content of a large body of magma, or even the entire moon, but Boyce's study indicates that apatite may, in fact, be deceptive.

Boyce believes the high water content within lunar apatite results from a quirk in the crystallization process rather than a water-rich lunar environment. When water is present as molten rock cools, apatite can form by incorporating hydrogen atoms into its crystal structure. However, hydrogen will be included in the newly crystallizing mineral only if apatite's preferred building blocks, fluorine and chlorine, have been mostly exhausted.

"Early-forming apatite is so fluorine-rich that it vacuums all the fluorine out of the magma, followed by chlorine," Boyce said. "Apatite that forms later doesn't see any fluorine or chlorine and becomes hydrogen-rich because it has no choice."

Therefore, when fluorine and chlorine become depleted, a cooling body of magma will shift from forming hydrogen-poor apatite to forming hydrogen-rich apatite, with the latter not accurately reflecting the original water content in the magma.

Understanding the story of lunar apatite has implications beyond determining how much water is locked inside lunar rocks and soil. According to the predominant theory of how the moon originally formed, hydrogen and other volatile elements should not be present at all in .

Many scientists theorize that the moon formed when a giant impact tore free a large chunk of Earth more than 4 billion years ago. If this "giant impact" model is correct, the moon would have been completely molten, and lighter elements such as hydrogen should have bubbled to the surface and escaped into space. Since hydrogen is a key component of water, a moon formed by a giant impact should be dry.

The majority of lunar samples are in fact very dry and missing lighter elements. Yet hydrogen-rich apatite crystals are found in a whole host of and have presented a paradox for scientists. Somehow, despite the moon's fiery beginning, some water and other volatiles may have remained, though perhaps not as much as apatite initially implied.

"We had 40 years of believing in a dry moon, and now we have some evidence that the old dry model of the moon wasn't perfect," Boyce said. "However, we need to be cautious and look carefully at each piece of evidence before we decide that rocks on the moon are as wet as those on Earth."

This study shows that scientists still have much to learn about the composition and environment of the early moon.

"We're knocking out one of the most important pillars of evidence regarding the conditions of the formation and evolution of the moon," Boyce said. "Next, we plan to determine how badly apatite has distorted our view of the moon and how we can best see past it to get at the moon's origin."

Explore further

Water hidden in the Moon may have proto-Earth origin

Journal information: Science

Citation: Misleading mineral may have resulted in overestimate of water in moon (2014, April 1) retrieved 24 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-04-mineral-resulted-overestimate-moon.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 01, 2014
More drivel from skeptics that never stopped believing in 'phlogiston' , the flat earth idea, earth as the center of the universe with the stars being only 'light bulbs', life begins only here, we should never even dream of exploring, etc. ....from the school this time of: Hey since we 'debunked' water, then we now should never go to the moon, right. Chinese do not listen to bunk like yours and will go to the moon and be quite self sufficient. It is already known from examination of returned mooon rocks that they contain water and will release it when heated to 800 degrees or so.

Apr 01, 2014
BTW, F and Cl are never found free in nature. Flourine and Chlorine...as well as Bromine, Iodine and Astatine are ...halogens...from group seven of Mendeleev's table. They are all extreme lewis electron acceptors and will steal electrons from anything possible to become ions in solution or just ionic compounds otherwise known as salts. Flourine if a free ion will displace O from glass (SiO2)...and etch it. These strong lewis base formers, halogens, are usually found bound to very strong electron donors like the Alkali metals...e.g. Na , K, Fr, etc.

Apr 02, 2014
Moon water tells a compelling story of water rich even sized low velocity planetoid impactors of Tellus and Theia, forming Earth and then the Moon from ejecta coalescence.

The Earth-Moon system has also an analog in the other collisional more-or-less double system out there, Pluto and Charon, which now turns up as being likely the same type of ring coalescence impact event. Charon's low density is a perfect match to the ices of Pluto's outer crust, which by their low temperature has exactly the right viscosity. [ http://www.hou.us...pdf/1135 ]

@Osiris1: They are scientists, not laymen skeptics, and criticizing scientific work is what they are supposed to do. They also don't claim that there is no water (they can't, since they predict its presence) or that the F & Cl is free. And indigenous water has little to do with the polar water residues, which has other sources too. (E.g cometary, solar wind sputtering combining H (wind) and O/OH (rocks), etc.)

Apr 02, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Apr 02, 2014
Since the Moon is of the Earth, I prefer the concept of expulsion. Just this side of seeing the Earth shattered. Why? Perhaps because the unusual magnetosphere sheath of our delayed solar magnetic reversal was the order of the day creating core heating instead of the tiny fragment of time the delayed reversal now occupy s.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more