Water hidden in the Moon may have proto-Earth origin

September 10, 2013
Earth’s Moon, as imaged by the Galileo mission. Credit: NASA/JPL/USGS

Water found in ancient Moon rocks might have actually originated from the proto-Earth and even survived the Moon-forming event. Latest research into the amount of water within lunar rocks returned during the Apollo missions is being presented by Jessica Barnes at the European Planetary Science Congress in London on Monday 9th September.

The Moon, including its interior, is believed to be much wetter than was envisaged during the Apollo era. The study by Barnes and colleagues at The Open University, UK, investigated the amount of water present in the mineral apatite, a mineral found in samples of the ancient lunar crust.

"These are some of the oldest rocks we have from the Moon and are much older than the oldest rocks found on Earth. The antiquity of these rocks make them the most appropriate samples for trying to understand the water content of the Moon soon after it formed about 4.5 billion years ago and for unravelling where in the Solar System that water came from," Barnes explains.

Barnes and her colleagues have found that the ancient contain appreciable amounts of water locked into the crystal structure of apatite. They also measured the hydrogen of the water in these lunar rocks to identify the potential source(s) for the water.

"The water locked into the mineral apatite in the Moon rocks studied has an isotopic signature very similar to that of the Earth and some carbonaceous chondrite meteorites," says Barnes. "The remarkable consistency between the hydrogen composition of lunar samples and water-reservoirs of the Earth strongly suggests that there is a common origin for water in the Earth-Moon system."

Explore further: Water on the moon: It's been there all along

Related Stories

Water on the moon: It's been there all along

February 18, 2013

Traces of water have been detected within the crystalline structure of mineral samples from the lunar highland upper crust obtained during the Apollo missions, according to a University of Michigan researcher and his colleagues.

Moon whets appetite for water

June 14, 2010

Scientists at the Carnegie Institution's Geophysical Laboratory, with colleagues, have discovered a much higher water content in the Moon's interior than previous studies. Their research suggests that the water was preserved ...

Recommended for you

New survey hints at exotic origin for the Cold Spot

April 25, 2017

A supervoid is unlikely to explain a 'Cold Spot' in the cosmic microwave background, according to the results of a new survey, leaving room for exotic explanations like a collision between universes. The researchers, led ...

Astronomers detect dozens of new quasars and galaxies

April 25, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team of astronomers led by Yoshiki Matsuoka of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ) has detected a treasure trove of new high-redshift quasars (or quasi-stellar objects) and luminous galaxies. ...

Preliminary results of Breakthrough Listen project released

April 25, 2017

(Phys.org)—The team of researchers working on the Breakthrough Listen project (affiliated with SETI) has released preliminary findings after sifting through several petabytes of data obtained from three telescopes involved ...

Team discovers lull in Mars' giant impact history

April 25, 2017

From the earliest days of our solar system's history, collisions between astronomical objects have shaped the planets and changed the course of their evolution. Studying the early bombardment history of Mars, scientists at ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rug
1.4 / 5 (10) Sep 10, 2013
More evidence for the Giant impact hypothesis. Sure really proof but at least evidence.

Then again, if the Earth and Moon formed in the same orbit it would be likely they would be made of the same material.

OK, fine, it's not really evidence for Theia. However, it does not rule it out either.

Either way, it's a rather interesting find.
tadchem
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 10, 2013
The original cloud of matter from which the solar system condensed was neither homogeneous, nor were the various substances segregated. It is certain that when the cloud cooled sufficiently water would have condensed as liquid or solid, but it is also certain that as other substances condensed, such as oxides or carbonates of alkali metals and alkaline earths, water vapor would have co-condensed with them forming hydrates and/or hydroxides.
rug
1.4 / 5 (10) Sep 10, 2013
The original cloud of matter from which the solar system condensed was neither homogeneous, nor were the various substances segregated.

I would like to know where got this information. Judging by the planets it would seem it was rather segregated. Some planets have higher concentrations of certain elements than others. Spend a bit of time poking around here and you will see that to be the case. http://solarsyste...ndex.cfm
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
1 / 5 (1) Sep 11, 2013
They bump up the wetness of the mantle from a range 0.06 - 5 ppm in earlier estimates [ http://en.wikiped.../Apatite ] to 1-5 ppm [ http://meetingorg...-105.pdf ]

This compares to Earth mantle water under pressure of 250 - 700 ppm, ~ 100 times more. [ http://minmag.geo...abstract ]

Presumably the volatile mass ratio mirrors the gravitational reassembly after the Tellus-Theia impact vaporization, where the mass ratio is ~ 1 % ( ~ 1/80).

@rug: As you say, more evidence rather than definite evidence. Alternates aren't yet ruled out. But they are no longer fruitful AFAIK, as the impact hypothesis is, they don't get new support at all. So this can be seen as the remaining practically viable alternative.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
1 / 5 (1) Sep 11, 2013
It should be 1-6 ppm in the new estimate. The comment box editor was giving me problems, so I mistyped in the last iteration.
rug
1.4 / 5 (9) Sep 11, 2013
@rug: As you say, more evidence rather than definite evidence. Alternates aren't yet ruled out. But they are no longer fruitful AFAIK, as the impact hypothesis is, they don't get new support at all. So this can be seen as the remaining practically viable alternative.

Upto and including when a new better theory comes to light. That is always a possibility.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.