Great Barrier Reef coral cores reveal 2011 flood damage

January 9, 2014
Great Barrier Reef coral cores reveal 2011 flood damage

(Phys.org) —Scientists have gained new insight into the damage done to coral in the Southern Great Barrier Reef by river run-off caused by intense weather events like the 2011 floods.

Core samples obtained from corals around the Keppel Islands reveals the way flood plumes from Queensland's Fitzroy River catchment have impacted reefs as far as 50km from the mouth of the river.

Scientists, including Assistant Professor Jens Zinke of The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute and School of Earth and Environment, sought to study how extreme rainfall and flood events around the Fitzroy River are controlled by the interplay between short and long-term cycles in the Pacific Ocean - and how that, in turn, affected coral health.

To do this, they examined metre-long coral cores for the tell-tale luminescence triggered by the kinds of organic compounds found in river plumes with their source in the hinterland and agricultural areas.

"When the water gets really turbid the corals take up all the parts that are in the water," Assistant Professor Zinke said. "Some of that is organic stuff which glows under UV light, and this is what we see in the coral. We can quantify the intensity of the glow, and that tells us when there was a large flood peak like in 2011."

It is the first time the 2011 event has been captured in cores - regarded by scientists as archives of climate change. The samples also revealed other events including big floods in the 1950s and 1970s.

Assistant Professor Zinke said the corals of the Great Barrier Reef - many of which could grow up to 5-6m over 400 years - provided longer term climate records than those available from satellite-based data, which went back only 20-30 years. The core samples used in the study provided information going back almost 100 years.

He said the very clear flood plume signature found in corals so far out, and over a long period of time, showed that the Southern Great Barrier Reef was particularly sensitive to climate extremes produced by the interplay between the long-term Pacific Decadal Oscillation cycle and shorter term La Niña events.

While these natural hazards associated with climatic phenomena were not new, warming ocean temperatures would continue to intensify the impact of such events. This in turn would mean more growth-inhibiting sedimentation reaching .

"Any natural climate event that's happening now might be of a much larger magnitude because of ongoing ocean ," Assistant Professor Zinke said"The inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef are the most impacted, and management of the hinterland is probably the only action that can buy time for corals that are already stressed from these river flood plumes."

Explore further: Pacific climate swings found to affect Western Indian Ocean rainfall

More information: Rodriguez-Ramirez A, Grove CA, Zinke J, Pandolfi JM, Zhao J-x (2014) "Coral Luminescence Identifies the Pacific Decadal Oscillation as a Primary Driver of River Runoff Variability Impacting the Southern Great Barrier Reef." PLoS ONE 9(1): e84305. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084305

Related Stories

'Wicked' problems devastate pristine Coral Reef

January 15, 2013

(Phys.org)—Human activity - rather than climate change - has been found to be the main cause of catastrophic devastation to a southern Indian Ocean coral reef system similar to Australia's iconic Great Barrier Reef.

Where can coral reefs relocate to escape the heat?

August 29, 2013

Fossil fuel emissions are impacting corals through high temperatures which can cause their deaths and ocean acidification which makes it difficult for them to produce their skeletons. In a study published today in Global ...

Jekyll and Hyde corals tell different warming story

March 26, 2013

(Phys.org) —Like the rings of a tree trunk, Strontium-to-calcium ratios (Sr/Ca) in coral skeletons have been widely used to determine past ocean temperatures from yearly banded corals. However, scientists have now found ...

Recommended for you

Multinationals act on ocean-clogging plastics

January 16, 2017

Forty of the world's biggest companies assembled in Davos agreed on Monday to come up with cleaner ways to make and consume plastic as waste threatens the global eco-system, especially in oceans.

Tracking Antarctic adaptations in diatoms

January 16, 2017

Diatoms are a common type of photosynthetic microorganism, found in many environments from marine to soil; in the oceans, they are responsible for more than a third of the global ocean carbon captured during photosynthesis. ...

Study tracks 'memory' of soil moisture

January 16, 2017

The top 2 inches of topsoil on all of Earth's landmasses contains an infinitesimal fraction of the planet's water—less than one-thousandth of a percent. Yet because of its position at the interface between the land and ...

How the darkness and the cold killed the dinosaurs

January 16, 2017

66 million years ago, the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs started the ascent of the mammals, ultimately resulting in humankind's reign on Earth. Climate scientists have now reconstructed how tiny droplets of sulfuric acid ...

Soil pores, carbon stores, and breathing microbes

January 16, 2017

Researchers at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) recently studied how moisture influences soil heterotrophic respiration. That's the breathing-like process by which microbes convert dead organic carbon in the ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1 / 5 (3) Jan 09, 2014
Ask any climate blame believer why they "believe" in climate change while science only believes in nothing beyond; "could be" a crisis? They are so eager to believe in climate change that they don't even know or care what science thinks as long as they can scare the kids and make it look like they are "concerned" for the planet. This is love for the planet? Its more like hate for humanity for who condemns their own children at the grunt of a 31 year old consensus headline not even knowing what the consensus really is; a meaningless consensus of "maybe".
goracle
5 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2014
Ask any climate blame believer why they "believe" in climate change while science only believes in nothing beyond; "could be" a crisis? They are so eager to believe in climate change that they don't even know or care what science thinks as long as they can scare the kids and make it look like they are "concerned" for the planet. This is love for the planet? Its more like hate for humanity for who condemns their own children at the grunt of a 31 year old consensus headline not even knowing what the consensus really is; a meaningless consensus of "maybe".

Same old same old. Whackamole!
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2014
climate blame believer why they "believe" in climate change while science only believes in nothing beyond; "could be" a crisis?


Come on. You've been posting the same thing for ages.
goracle
5 / 5 (2) Jan 12, 2014
climate blame believer why they "believe" in climate change while science only believes in nothing beyond; "could be" a crisis?


Come on. You've been posting the same thing for ages.

While claiming science is a religion, this troll repeats the same talking point as a mantra or memorized prayer...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.