Australia's Barrier Reef set for heritage downgrade: UNESCO

A leopard shark swims past Sydney Aquarium divers urging UNESCO to save the Great Barrier Reef on March 5, 2012
A leopard shark (below), swims past as Sydney Aquarium divers unveil a Greenpeace banner urging UNESCO to save the Great Barrier Reef at the Sydney Aquarium on March 5, 2012. Australia insisted it was committed to protecting the Great Barrier Reef on Saturday after the UN warned that the natural wonder's world heritage status could be in downgraded in 2014.

Australia insisted it was committed to protecting the Great Barrier Reef on Saturday after the UN warned that the natural wonder's world heritage status could be in downgraded in 2014.

UNESCO said little had been done to address concerns about rampant coastal development and raised a year ago with the Australian government in a warning that its heritage status was at risk.

"The state party has made progress on some key issues and actions but progress on several recommendations, including those related to water quality and measures to prevent coastal development ... remains limited," UNESCO said ahead of its annual congress next month in Phnom Penh.

"Urgent and decisive action is needed to address these issues."

Without a "firm and demonstrable commitment on these priority issues" UNESCO said the reef should be considered for inscription on the list of in danger in 2014.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said her government had taken steps to increase protection of the reef, including Aus$200 million (US$206 million) towards the Reef Rescue water quality project.

An undated handout photo released on March 1, 2012, by the Catlin Seaview Survey shows a view of the Great Barrier Reef
An undated handout photo released on March 1, 2012, by the Catlin Seaview Survey shows a view of the iconic Great Barrier Reef. Australia insisted it was committed to protecting the Great Barrier Reef on Saturday after the UN warned that the natural wonder's world heritage status could be in downgraded in 2014.

"We are very committed to keeping the as the wonderful heritage area for the world that it is and for our nation," Gillard told repoters.

But environmental group WWF said UNESCO had "put Australia in the sin bin".

"The expert bodies are so concerned that they are recommending an immediate halt to approvals of projects that could individually or cumulatively impact on the reef's values until (Australia's state and national) governments have properly responded to their recommendations," said WWF's Richard Leck.

Australia's environmentally-driven Greens party said the latest UNESCO report was a "slap on the wrist" for the government, with most sites on the heritage in danger list in developing nations or .

"This is the world heritage body warning us that we need to (do) better or our reef, our most precious tourism icon, will be put on the world heritage endangered list, along with other countries like Yemen, the Congo and Afghanistan," said Greens Senator Larissa Waters.

Australia is riding an unprecedented wave of resources investment due to booming demand from Asia, with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of resource projects in the pipeline.

Last June UNESCO said the sheer number and scale of proposals, including liquefied natural gas, tourism and mining projects, could threaten the reef's status.


Explore further

Australia failing UNESCO demands on Barrier Reef

© 2013 AFP

Citation: Australia's Barrier Reef set for heritage downgrade: UNESCO (2013, May 5) retrieved 20 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-05-australia-barrier-reef-heritage-downgrade.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 06, 2013
"We are very committed to keeping the Great Barrier Reef as the wonderful heritage area for the world that it is and for our nation," Gillard told repoters.


I can almost certainly say that this isn't true. The Queensland government has mostly an apathetic attitude towards the Great Barrier Reef. They only care about how much money they can make from mining and coastal developments. Clearly, we don't deserve to be blessed with the Great Barrier Reef on our doorstep.

May 06, 2013
I'd like to hear a lot more from Aussies about this issue. I am aware that there are multiple threats to the GBR, but I'd appreciate much more detail.

May 06, 2013
Bluddy arstrayans.

Sinister is right; the current (and the previous wasn't much better) QLD governments are apathetic regarding the GBR. I understand that the Federal and the other states have been pressuring QLD to be more responsible, however the Federal Gov has been dottering due to the antipathy towards it.* The other states have their own environmental issues so have not been in the best position to point the bone.

* IMO being strong handed and decisive would be precisely what wins Aussies over to the Labor Party. Most people, AFAICT, aren't opposed to environmentally policies even if the citizens don't think they will succeed --- including in QLD. They just hate the canoodling that occurs to get any policy past the gate. As that has been the politics since the first few months of the former Rudd gov, the current gov is tripping itself up.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more