Internet temptation at work lowers employee productivity

Internet temptation at work lowers employee productivity
The average mistake (measured as the absolute difference between the correct answer and the subject’s answer) in the No Willpower Treatment (NWT) and Willpower Treatment (WT) groups in Phase 1 and Phase 3. Both groups perform better in Phase 3 than in Phase 1 due to a learning effect, and the WT group performs better than the NWT group in Phase 1 due to greater skill. However, after exposure to temptation, the WT group performs significantly worse than the NWT group. Credit: Bucciol, et al.

Surfing the Internet is the number one way people waste time at work and costs companies billions of dollars per year, according to a 2005 survey by But a new study shows that, when employees are told not to use the Internet for personal use, the temptation requires so much willpower to resist that worker productivity decreases. The result is not surprising, considering that it's well-established in social psychology that using willpower to delay gratification can detrimentally impact performance on subsequent tasks due to the additional energy exertion.

Research economists Alessandro Bucciol at the University of Verona, Italy; Daniel Houser at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, US; and Marco Piovesan at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, have published their results on Internet temptation at work in .

To reach their conclusion, the researchers conducted an experiment in which they asked 60 subjects to perform a series of counting tasks. In each task, subjects watched a video where eight people passed balls of different colors to each other. Subjects had to count the exact number of times a specific ball moved from one person to another, with the level of complexity varying depending on the number of ball passes. Subjects earned small sums of money if they accurately reported the correct answer and smaller sums if they were off by one or two passes. The counting task was intended to be similar to a piece-rate task in a real , where productivity is measured in quality (or accuracy).

The experiment consisted of three phases, starting with a series of three counting tasks, followed by a task that either required willpower or did not require willpower, and ending with a series of 10 more counting tasks. In the second phase, half of the subjects were shown a funny video for 10 minutes and did not have to do anything requiring willpower. The other half were shown a screen with a button labeled "Video" that would start the video, but were asked not to press the button. To increase the temptation, these subjects could hear sounds of the video coming from a different room. If they pressed the button, a message appeared on the screen telling them they should not have pressed the button. If they pressed the button a second time, the researchers considered the subjects overwhelmed by temptation and excluded them from the analysis. Only one subject pressed the button twice.

The results revealed a significant difference in the counting accuracy of the two groups on the final series of counting tasks. All else being equal, subjects who were exposed to temptation by being asked not to watch the video made mistakes that were nearly three times larger than those made by the subjects who were shown the video. The researchers attribute this difference to the fact that exerting willpower depletes energy and makes concentration more difficult. On the other hand, watching the funny video may have helped replenish energy, allowing those subjects to concentrate better on the subsequent counting tasks.

"It is important to understand both how energy is depleted as well as how it is replenished," Houser told "We suspect the [replenishment contribution from watching the funny video] may be very difficult to uncover using our data. Future research exploring this further would be profitable."

The different performances between the two groups held even when the researchers accounted for other factors that may affect counting accuracy. For example, the "willpower" group performed significantly better than the "non-willpower" group on the first phase of counting tasks, suggesting that the willpower group had greater counting skill, on average. Also, both groups performed better after the second phase, reflecting a learning effect. In addition, the researchers controlled for other variables such as age, gender, nationality, field of study, number of household members, and personal budget. Yet in the third phase, the non-willpower group performed better on average than the willpower group, despite performing worse in the first phase.

This study is the first to find a relation between temptation and labor productivity, although a previous study found that the productivity of children is reduced after they are exposed to temptation.

The researchers think that the results may have practical implications for many work environments. Mainly, the findings suggest that employers should not prohibit the Internet for personal use and yet leave it available. Better alternatives would be to either remove the Internet completely or give employees Internet breaks similar to cigarette or coffee breaks.

A few limitations that the researchers noted are that the study assessed productivity on a task that required substantial concentration and allowed little room for error. In work environments where employees perform routine tasks that require little concentration and allow large margins for error, temptation may not have the same detrimental impact on performance. Also, if any of the subjects in the willpower group believed that the temptation they faced was depleting their energy and ability to concentrate, this belief may have impacted their performance. In the future, the researchers hope to further investigate these questions in real-world situations.

"Ideally we would like to test the external validity of our finding using field experiments," Houser said. "Doing so would be facilitated through collaboration with a corporate partner."

Explore further

Need a study break to refresh? Maybe not, say researchers

More information: Alessandro Bucciol, et al. "Temptation at Work." PLoS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053713
Journal information: PLoS ONE

Copyright 2013
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of

Citation: Internet temptation at work lowers employee productivity (2013, February 12) retrieved 17 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 12, 2013
I'm reading this at work...

Feb 12, 2013
Everyone needs breaks from doing work to keep in a good frame of mind, taking that away is a cause of loss of productivity. No one should be trying to make people work 8 hours a day non-stop, it's counter-productive

Feb 12, 2013
That's alright, it isn't as if most people get paid to do anything more important than flip hamburgers for each other.

Feb 12, 2013
Once you're in the habit of not surfing the Internet at work, though, the "overcoming temptation" hit should lesson, right?

Feb 12, 2013
Wanting to enjoy your job so bad that when your not allowed to do so, it adversely effects your performance. Who would have thought.

Personally speaking, If your productivity is higher than your cost to be maintained then I don't see an issue.

Feb 12, 2013
I do twelve hour shifts in front of the screen with no breaks. Workload is highly variable. When nothing requires my attention and other peripheral tasks are completed, I read stuff on here. I'd go bloody batty if I had to sit and twiddle my thumbs until the next breakdown..

edit: especially on night shift, it helps keep my brain active.

Feb 12, 2013
I'm reading this at work...


I am not reading this at work, but i do routinely read this website while at work.

I wonder, what if you showed someone a temptation, but that temptation was unavailable. Like a candy bar locked inside a container with windows. Would those people still perform as well on their test? Would be comparable to a well calibrated web filter that didn't let people like me browse to sites like this while at work.

Feb 12, 2013
It's studies like this that lower employee productivity. What crap, honestly.

Feb 12, 2013
I remember having jobs without internet access as a possibility. All the employees talked to each other, sat around silently spinning in a chair or filled a latex glove with water and slid it down the counter then drew a penguin face on it. Bottom line: employees will take breaks and if they don't have the internet, they'll waste time some other way.

Feb 12, 2013
Blocking the internet on the pc causes people to surf on their phones which is slower and wastes even more time. People need breaks through out the day and going on the internet is one type of break. Its funny hearing IT make all kind of security excuses when they start blocking sites.

Feb 13, 2013
It was only three years ago I read that surfing boosted employee productivity and morale. Now situational awareness is again being viewed as something only management enjoy

Feb 13, 2013
Well, we needed a study for this, rather than to let the market forces weed out dumb companies that treat their employees like hamsters.

Feb 15, 2013

Less addictive breaks are better for productivity, more addictive breaks are not.

Feb 17, 2013
We always found other distractions long before the internet to get us a break away from our typewriters.

Feb 17, 2013
Studies show that the brain is, to use a metaphor, discharding like a battery during waking hours. Breaks allow the subconscious to take on problem solving while the consciousness continues to access the fear, flight, fight and fucking potential of the environment. Later when consciousness returns to the problem it is often simplified or solved.

Of course, corporate America prefers sleep-deprived drones working below living wage who can't solve problems and fixate at a childish level of emotional intelligence. That is considered productivity in America, where bullshit is the lifeblood of the economy and hubris replaces lifetime achievement and satisfaction. Wellbeing is displaced by incessant and jarringly discontinuous episodic memories which sum to nothing. Sabbaticals, reflection and healing are replaced by hours of sitting on freeways and television noise

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more