Global warming: Changing interactions between species may be more dangerous than high temperatures alone

October 17, 2012, The Royal Society
A crevice spiny lizard (Sceloporus poinsettii): widespread local extinctions in spiny lizards have been caused by anthropogenic climate change. Credit: Shea Lambert

(—Climate change causes extinctions not only as a result of species intolerance to high temperature, but more commonly via a variety of related factors that alter a species' interactions with other species, according to a new review published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Contrary to expectations given global warming, researchers from Stony Brook University found little evidence that many species have gone locally extinct or declined due to direct effects of higher temperatures. Instead, climate change was found to typically lead to local extinctions and declines by influencing interactions between species, such as reducing prey populations for predators.

Researchers reviewed 136 studies that suggested that was associated with local extinctions or declines and found just seven for which the primary cause ("proximate cause") of extinction could be identified. Of these, none of the seven showed a straightforward relationship between a local extinction and limited tolerances to high temperature, and most implicated species interactions, such as declines in prey species or increased disease spread, as the proximate cause. Additionally, seven studies of population declines related to recent climate change showed a very similar pattern, as did four studies of declines related to natural climatic oscillations.

Author, Professor John J. Wiens, said: "Dozens of studies have shown local extinctions and declines that appear to be associated with recent, human-related climate change. For most of these cases, the primary cause of the declines has not been identified, highlighting our worryingly limited knowledge of this crucial issue. However, where causes have been identified, changing species interactions have been found to be key in the majority of cases. Because many of these impacts have already happened and climate has changed only a little so far relative to the predicted changes in the next 100 years, our results suggest that these shifting interactions may make even small climatic changes dangerous for the survival of populations and species."

The researchers identified a number of factors ("proximate causes") hypothesised to lead to extinction from climate change, principally:

  • Impacts of limited physiological tolerance to changes in temperature, with specific proximate causes including decreased activity time and increased energy maintenance costs leading to starvation, or reduced oxygenation of water
  • Impacts of limited physiological tolerance to changes in precipitation, with species proximate causes including loss of habitat for freshwater species or life stages and water stress and death in terrestrial species
  • Climate-related impacts on beneficial species, for example extinction or declines of prey species, pollinators or host species
  • Climate-related impacts on harmful species, for example increases in predators, competitors and pathogens
  • Changes to activity times of interacting species due to changes in different cues such as temperature and photoperiods
Following this, they identified seven studies in which a specific proximate cause could be attributed to a local extinction associated with climate change. Four of these involved changes in species interactions, including climate-related reductions in food species for a planarian worm and a bighorn sheep, mismatched timing in a butterfly and its host plant, and climate-related loss of coral habitat for a fish species. Other causes included loss of aquatic habitat for African fish species due to drought, both high and low temperatures in an American mammal (pika), and reduced surface activity during the breeding season due to high temperatures in Mexican lizard species.

They then identified seven studies of declines associated with climate change (given that these declines can lead to extinction). They found similar patterns, with species interactions being the most frequent proximate cause of declines, including climate-related reductions in food for three bird species (a plover, a jay, and an auklet), and declines due to climate-related spread of a fungus in dozens of species in a genus of tropical frogs (Atelopus). Declines were also related to limited precipitation (in an African aloe tree and four North American amphibians) and oxygen limitation at higher temperatures in a fish (eelpout).

Finally, they found that local extinctions and declines due to climatic oscillations (rather than long-term trends) were also due primarily to species , including climate-related loss of figs for fig wasps, loss of symbiotic algae for corals, loss of coral used for food by a butterfly fish, and disease spread in a toad.

Professor Wiens added: "Currently our knowledge of the ways in which climate change can lead to extinctions is extremely limited. Understanding the proximate causes of from climate change should be an urgent priority for future research if we are to develop effective conservation strategies to ameliorate their effects."

Explore further: Frogs that can take the heat expected to fare better in a changing world

More information: rspb.royalsocietypublishing.or … .1098/rspb.2012.1890

Related Stories

Climate impacts on marine biodiversity

August 24, 2015

New research into the impact of climate change has found that warming oceans will cause profound changes in the global distribution of marine biodiversity.

Recommended for you

Cells lacking nuclei struggle to move in 3-D environments

January 20, 2018

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers have revealed new details of how the physical properties of the nucleus influence how cells can move around different environments - such as ...

Microbial communities demonstrate high turnover

January 19, 2018

When Mark Twain famously said "If you don't like the weather in New England, just wait a few minutes," he probably didn't anticipate MIT researchers would apply his remark to their microbial research. But a new study does ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.2 / 5 (18) Oct 17, 2012
Global Warming (sic) ended 16 years ago (and was not anthropomorphic in the first place).

2.3 / 5 (16) Oct 17, 2012
Maybe in your Universe, but not here. How's the food there?
3.7 / 5 (6) Oct 17, 2012
To see the responce of the MET office to the four articles listed by Shootist (which, typical of the deliberate deception practiced by Shootist, are all actually one article) go here:

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.