Kilobots - tiny, collaborative robots - are leaving the nest (w/ video)

Kilobots are leaving the nest
The Kilobots are an inexpensive system for testing synchronized and collaborative behavior in a very large swarm of robots. Photo courtesy of Michael Rubenstein

( -- The Kilobots are coming. Computer scientists and engineers at Harvard University have developed and licensed technology that will make it easy to test collective algorithms on hundreds, or even thousands, of tiny robots.

Called Kilobots, the quarter-sized bug-like devices scuttle around on three toothpick-like legs, interacting and coordinating their own behavior as a team. A June 2011 Harvard Technical Report demonstrated a collective of 25 machines implementing swarming behaviors such as foraging, formation control, and synchronization.

Once up and running, the machines are fully autonomous, meaning there is no need for a human to control their actions.

The communicative critters were created by members of the Self-Organizing Systems Research Group led by Radhika Nagpal, the Thomas D. Cabot Associate Professor of Computer Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and a Core Faculty Member at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard. Her team also includes Michael Rubenstein, a postdoctoral fellow at SEAS; and Christian Ahler, a fellow of SEAS and the Wyss Institute.

Thanks to a technology licensing deal with the K-Team Corporation, a Swiss manufacturer of high-quality mobile robots, researchers and robotics enthusiasts alike can now take command of their own swarm.

One key to achieving high-value applications for multi-robot systems in the future is the development of sophisticated algorithms that can coordinate the actions of tens to thousands of robots.

"The Kilobot will provide researchers with an important new tool for understanding how to design and build large, distributed, functional systems," says Michael Mitzenmacher, Area Dean for Computer Science at SEAS.

"Plus," he adds, " are really cool!"

The name "Kilobot" does not refer to anything nefarious; rather, it describes the researchers' goal of quickly and inexpensively creating a collective of a thousand bots.

Inspired by nature, such swarms resemble social insects, such as ants and bees, that can efficiently search for and find food sources in large, complex environments, collectively transport large objects, and coordinate the building of nests and other structures.

Due to reasons of time, cost, and simplicity, the algorithms being developed today in research labs are only validated in computer simulation or using a few dozen robots at most.

In contrast, the design by Nagpal's team allows a single user to easily oversee the operation of a large Kilobot collective, including programming, powering on, and charging all robots, all of which would be difficult (if not impossible) using existing robotic systems.

So, what can you do with a thousand tiny little bots?

Robot swarms might one day tunnel through rubble to find survivors, monitor the environment and remove contaminants, and self-assemble to form support structures in collapsed buildings.

They could also be deployed to autonomously perform construction in dangerous environments, to assist with pollination of crops, or to conduct search and rescue operations.

For now, the Kilobots are designed to provide scientists with a physical testbed for advancing the understanding of collective behavior and realizing its potential to deliver solutions for a wide range of challenges.

Explore further

Kilobots bring us one step closer to a robot swarm

Provided by Harvard University
Citation: Kilobots - tiny, collaborative robots - are leaving the nest (w/ video) (2011, November 21) retrieved 20 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 21, 2011
Obligatory "I, for one" comment anyone? Awesome to finally see this idea put into practice though.

Nov 21, 2011
2nd video is somewhat thought-provoking.....what I don't get is why people don't just mod some small toys, something like micro-rc racers, or

instead of making herkyjerky stiltbots from scratch.., I would think if one is trying to test robot swarms, having higher mobility would be key.

Nov 21, 2011
Because these guys can run for 3 hrs on a single watch battery.

Nov 21, 2011
Just remember people, out of the who-knows-how-many thousands of projects being done at any given period of time; some of them being cute and some being frightening for various reasons (magnetic propelled kinetic ordinance freak anyone else out?) all it takes is one "Skynet" to end the world, and someone is working on it.

Nov 21, 2011
@Cave Man, If everyone had your world view, we would all be still living in caves and dying before we reach our 30s."Skynet", whenever I see a comment with that word in it, I know nothing insightful will be found there.

Nov 21, 2011
Great. Soon I can have the nanite cloud synthetic organelle symbiosis in my cells. I wont need a computer or a cellphone anymore. I just use my mind connected to my nanite cloud. It could also do tissue repair and medicine delivery, biosensors and i dont know what else. Today, the nanite cloud. Tomorrow, the world!

Nov 21, 2011
The innovation here is a physical representation, but essentially, it's just a cellular automata system.

Emergent behaviors from cellular automata run as computer simulations have been explored extensively over many years. The complexity of such behaviors from very simple rules never fails to amaze.

Nov 21, 2011
Reminds me of that "robot" in development awhile back that supposedly travels around battlefields and the like consuming "organic waste" (read: corpses) to burn as a source of "fuel" or energy.

Wish I could find the link...

Nov 22, 2011
Thanks for showing up such fabulous information. I like this post, keep writing and give informative post...!

Nov 22, 2011
"I, for one" comment is now considered a 'pointless verbiage' by PhysOrg. In case of invasion the overlords won't be merciful to the staff of this server.

Nov 22, 2011
I for one welcome our new micro overlords

Nov 22, 2011
"I, for one" comment is now considered a 'pointless verbiage' by PhysOrg. In case of invasion the overlords won't be merciful to the staff of this server.

True, lol. And, of all they're categories for "post removal", I can't quite figure out how they can make that determination. Seems like there's LOTS of pointless verbiage. But they don't take it all off.

Nov 23, 2011
Nerdyguy: El_Nose's comment still holds. I recon.. favouritism; or negligence. :D

Nov 26, 2011
Can you program them to vote?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more