Military tests usefulness of smart devices

September 27, 2011 By W.J. Hennigan

As a Cobra attack helicopter pilot, Marine Capt. Jim "Hottie" Carlson was running support missions above Afghanistan last summer when it occurred to him that it was taking far too long to find where U.S. troops were under attack.

"Do you have any idea how long it takes to find the right map, unfold it, and find where you're going? It's agonizing," he said.

Frustrated that he had to flip through dozens of maps stuffed inside his chopper, Carlson, 31, loaded the documents onto his personal , enabling him to zoom in, zoom out and quickly move from one map to another.

Carlson's brainstorm shortened the time it took to pinpoint a location from "three minutes to about 30 seconds," he recalled recently, and it soon helped change the way the military is thinking about warfare. The Marines now have more than 30 iPads in cockpits across their fleet of helicopters and fighter jets.

For soldiers in the 21st century, iPads, iPhones, Androids and other smart devices could eventually be as common on the battlefield as helmets, canteens and rifles.

These devices are being tested across all branches of the military. Seeing an opportunity, software companies and defense contractors are developing mobile applications that will enable soldiers to pass along intelligence, view reconnaissance images or even pilot small drones by remote control.

This high-tech hand-held revolution, of course, opens the military up to the same problems that everybody else with a smart device faces - security threats and concerns about dropped service. There are concerns among military strategists about passing military secrets on a device that can easily be hacked.

In years past, the Pentagon probably would have spent billions of dollars creating its own custom devices, but modern technology offers a much cheaper alternative, said Michael McCarthy, who leads an effort by the Army to test smartphones for use on the battlefield.

The Army is using iPhones, Androids and BlackBerrys in mock wartime situations in New Mexico and Texas.

Such devices are coming in handy in simulated security raids and checkpoint stops to take pictures of Arabic writing and gather biometric data, such as fingerprints and iris scans, McCarthy said.

"It's all about information gathering, and tools to make the job easier," he said.

The troops are also testing about 95 , or apps, designed to help soldiers perform specific tasks with their cellphones. One app is dubbed Soldier Eyes. "Imagine that you're dropped in an unknown location on a moonless night," McCarthy said. "You open this app and through its GPS coordinates, it shows you where you are. It shows you where your adjacent units are."

It can also provide cumulative information about the region, he said, showing how many roadside bomb attacks have occurred and when they took place.

The app is being developed by Overwatch Mobile Solutions, a subsidiary of Textron Inc., in close collaboration with the Army.

"A typical soldier carries a map, a compass, a radio and a GPS," said Evan Corwin, a senior program manager at Overwatch. "This enables them to have all of that on one device."

In all, the Army said it has spent about $4.2 million over two years to develop the apps and test smartphones.

The Air Force and Navy also have pilot programs testing smart-device technology. But the devices are risk-prone and susceptible to security breaches that could threaten military secrets.

Internet security firm McAfee Inc. recently found that malware, short for "malicious software," targeting smartphones and tablets is on the rise.

The widespread adoption of mobile devices is likely to bring about "an explosion" of attacks, McAfee said.

"Given our historically fragile cellular infrastructure and slow strides toward encryption, user and corporate data may face serious risks," the company said.

Critics wonder what will happen if a soldier's Android is hacked or infected with malware.

"The military is opening themselves up to serious problems," said Chris Soghoian, a privacy and security researcher at the Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research at Indiana University. "It seems stupid to use a platform that thousands of people are trying to hack."

Storing data on the phones will end up disclosing military information or showing the enemy precisely where the troops are through the devices' GPS transmitters, Soghoian said. "It's a recipe for disaster."

Symantec Corp., known for its personal computer security software, is developing a product called O3 that officials say could secure wireless military networks. Much of the company's planning will depend on how the Army wants to proceed on smartphone security.

If the Army was to decide to put a smartphone in the hands of every soldier, it alone would need to buy 1.2 million phones. That could be a major source of revenue for phone makers.

In the coming years, defense giant Raytheon Co. anticipates that the app market will be huge. The company, famous for building 2,000-pound bunker-busting bombs and Tomahawk cruise missiles, will unveil an online store called Appsmart this year where military apps can be bought.

"We think that within three years there will be a major move in the military toward fielding mobile handsets," said Mark A. Bigham, Raytheon's vice president of business development for defense and civil mission solutions. "We hope Appsmart will play an important role in that initiative."

Commercial apps typically sell for a couple of dollars because they often sell by the millions. With far fewer made, military apps are expected to be more expensive and could sell for as much as $500 apiece, Bigham said.

The company has developed the Raytheon Advanced Tactical System, software that enables troops to share sensitive information on smartphones. It has also developed more than 20 apps. "There's a lot of companies large and small vying for this marketplace," he said.

Harris Corp. of Melbourne, Fla., has developed a miniature cell tower mounted on a Humvee that provides cell coverage to remote areas with patchy or nonexistent service. The system, named KnightHawk, generates connectivity by providing network signals for a three-mile radius.

"Troops aren't typically dropped in an area where AT&T and Verizon have coverage," said Edward J. Zoiss, Harris' vice president of advanced programs and technology. "That's where Harris comes in."

The company, which also makes military radios, believes that the services will use smart devices at the front lines in battle, and that KnightHawk will provide coverage. Harris has also developed an app called Eyes-on-Target that enables troops to share streaming video on their phones - rather than use radios and hand and arm signals.

Even drone aircraft may get a boost from these phones. Students at MIT and researchers at Boeing Co. have demonstrated that a person can fly miniature with an iPhone.

Imagine a soldier pulling a drone out of a backpack and then controlling it to see inaccessible spots on the battlefield, said Boeing technician Joshua Downs. "It is applications such as this that are helping to move the technology forward."

Explore further: Army tests iOS and Android devices for potential combat usage

Related Stories

Raytheon turns iPhones into battlefield tools

December 17, 2009

US defense contractor Raytheon on Wednesday unveiled the first of what it said will be a series of software applications to make iPhones or iPod touch devices into battlefield tools.

Malicious programmers focus on smartphones, tablets

May 4, 2011

Malicious programmers are always looking for new targets. While smartphones and tablets replace PCs as the gadgets we use for messaging, Web surfing and even doing business, some shady characters are starting to target these ...

New power sources needed for soldier of the future

September 11, 2004

The U.S. Army should investigate alternative power sources, such as fuel cells and small engines, to create longer-lasting, lighter, cheaper, and more reliable sources of energy for the equipment soldiers will use in the ...

Senator calls for smartphone app privacy policies

May 25, 2011

(AP) -- A key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee is challenging Apple Inc. and Google Inc. to require all developers that make apps for their mobile devices to adopt formal privacy policies.

Recommended for you

A not-quite-random walk demystifies the algorithm

December 15, 2017

The algorithm is having a cultural moment. Originally a math and computer science term, algorithms are now used to account for everything from military drone strikes and financial market forecasts to Google search results.

US faces moment of truth on 'net neutrality'

December 14, 2017

The acrimonious battle over "net neutrality" in America comes to a head Thursday with a US agency set to vote to roll back rules enacted two years earlier aimed at preventing a "two-speed" internet.

FCC votes along party lines to end 'net neutrality' (Update)

December 14, 2017

The Federal Communications Commission repealed the Obama-era "net neutrality" rules Thursday, giving internet service providers like Verizon, Comcast and AT&T a free hand to slow or block websites and apps as they see fit ...

The wet road to fast and stable batteries

December 14, 2017

An international team of scientists—including several researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory—has discovered an anode battery material with superfast charging and stable operation ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
The detailed engineering for these smart devices is done in Asia. So much for security.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
I like where they are going - moving into the future. But they definitely need to have thier own unique devices, not the same ones that everyone else uses. They should be heavily encrypted ad-hoc networks for some uses, and mobile networks for others. But really, who uses paper maps anymore?
not rated yet Sep 27, 2011
If your iPad can show you the locations of adjacent units, then it can show the enemy too.
5 / 5 (4) Sep 27, 2011
Nobody's talking about using an iPad for any mission-specific data. For anything like that you need an absolutely closed, secure ecosystem. That's not going to change.

What you can use these consumer devices for (what they talk about in the article which perhaps wasn't read) is for quick access to non-secure data.

It doesn't matter wether your map with no mission data on it is on a piece of paper or on a tablet (with no GPS or internet connectivity, I presume). Actually it does matter, they shaved two and a half minutes off the time required to provide close air support to soldiers being attacked on the ground.

I can't even imagine how long an eternity two an a half minutes is when you're being fired upon and need air support.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 28, 2011
Temple, I agree with what you are saying. My point is that the military is obviously behind the curve if they are just starting to do this. I was suggesting that they either Modify consumer tech or get thier own made custom, but that they should stop using old stuff like a compass and a map.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 28, 2011
Nothing says they can't have a custom hardware-level encryption scheme worked in (like they do to their workstations) and can't build their own OS to go on the phones... It's not like they'll be running their communications through the cellular network... they already have heavily encrypted and secure communications and data relay setups that are deployed in the warzones, all it'd take is a little additional hardware, but it could still be based on the off-the-shelf phones. Custom OS and custom apps would provide the rest of the security, along with ruggedization.
Also, they would not be able to get rid of the old GPS and compass, etc... for the same reason glass cockpit airplanes still have analog backups for all the guages.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 30, 2011
they should stop using old stuff like a compass and a map.

They need that stuff, and more legacy things, like a knife, for contingency when they get shot down. What happens when all your comms gear and GPS beacon gets smashed or shot up?
5 / 5 (1) Oct 03, 2011
they should stop using old stuff like a compass and a map.

They need that stuff, and more legacy things, like a knife, for contingency when they get shot down. What happens when all your comms gear and GPS beacon gets smashed or shot up?

Wait! What about that knife app?! I think it's called "Stabby Stabby"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.