A model could guide the design of artificial composites

Demystifying natural hierarchy
Macro cross-sectionn of human hip bone. Credit: Patrick Siemer

Many biomaterials such as bone, shell and mineralized tendon have a hierarchical structure that provides the material with exceptional mechanical and load-bearing properties, even though the building blocks of such structures may themselves have very poor mechanical properties. One type of structural hierarchy known as ‘self-similarity’ is ubiquitous in nature and is based on the repetition of units that are composed of biominerals and proteins, creating multi-level structures that provide enhanced strength and durability.

The number of hierarchical levels in such structures is dependent on the mineral content. Bone, for example, combines soft organic collagen material and hard crystal phases in an organized seven-level structure (see image), whereas shell is typically organized into two- or three-level structures. Little has been known, however, about what determines the number of levels in natural systems. Zuoqi Zhang at the A*STAR Institute of High Performance Computing and co-workers have now developed a theoretical, quasi-self-similar model to demonstrate why these natural biomaterials typically exhibit two to seven levels of structural hierarchy.

Previous experiments at different size scales have shown that the cooperative deformation of load-bearing biomaterials depends on their underlying hierarchical structures. The model developed by Zhang’s team, however, is the first to match these measurements of mineral and collagen deformation in bone and mineralized tendon. In the new model, each hierarchical level consists of hard, slender inclusions that form a staggered pattern within a soft matrix. These staggered microstructures then serve as inclusions in the next level. “The aspect ratio of the inclusions varies from level to level,” says Zhang.

The model showed that depending on mineral concentration, maximum toughness is obtained at a certain number of hierarchical levels and a certain . Zhang notes that within the optimal structure, characteristic sizes range from tens of nanometers to hundreds of micrometers. The model also confirmed the predicted trend that the number of hierarchical levels would be highest for bone, lower for mineralized tendon, and lowest for shell. “These predictions are in agreement with experimental observations,” says Zhang.

The researchers are currently planning to use their to guide the design and fabrication of artificial hierarchical composites in the laboratory. In addition, they are investigating the ability of hierarchical biomaterials to resist impact load. “We are trying to reveal the underlying mechanisms that may lead to acoustic cloaking composites—materials with the ability to make an object ‘invisible’ to sound,” says Zhang.

Explore further

Scientists probe secret of bone's strength

More information: Zhang, Z., et al. On optimal hierarchy of load-bearing biological materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278, 519–525 (2011). rspb.royalsocietypublishing.or … content/278/1705/519
Provided by Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)
Citation: A model could guide the design of artificial composites (2011, September 19) retrieved 16 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-09-artificial-composites.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 19, 2011
" We are trying to reveal the underlying mechanisms that may lead to acoustic cloaking compositesmaterials with the ability to make an object invisible to sound "

I imagine when they can produce metal nanomaterials with foam-like structures is when that will start to happen.


Sep 19, 2011
The number of hierarchical levels in such structures is dependent on the mineral content.

Actually, for biologiocal structures that is not true. The minimum size of trabeculae is determined by the size of the remodeling cells (osteoclasts and osteoblasts). This is why the individual structures in a rat's knee and a human knee on the finest level are of the same size (because osteoclasts and osteoblasts are of the same size in rats and humans)

The human knee has more hierarchical levels because it is bigger. The rat knee may have a dozen trabeculae but no real hierarchical structure because the next hierarchy is already the size of the respective bone (femur/tibia)

Mineral content, therefore, does not define the hierarchical structure in bone - it merely defines the density of each level of hierarchy (and to some extent the morphology: rodlike or platelike)

Sep 19, 2011
I think it's an interesting observation that the inclusions( read: defects ) in one level of structure are the base for the next level up in structural stability. It means that each level of hierarchical structure has a different bulk modulus, right ? It's self-correction in biological structures. The inclusions ( shearing, fracturing, etc ) represent everything about the structure at that scale that's insufficient, that forms the basis for the next level up ?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more