Inexpensive catalyst that makes hydrogen gas 10 times faster than natural enzyme

Catalyst that makes hydrogen gas breaks speed record
The part of the catalyst that cranks out 100,000 molecules of hydrogen gas a second packs electrons into chemical bonds between hydrogen atoms, possibly hijacked from water. Credit: PNNL

Looking to nature for their muse, researchers have used a common protein to guide the design of a material that can make energy-storing hydrogen gas. The synthetic material works 10 times faster than the original protein found in water-dwelling microbes, the researchers report in the August 12 issue of the journal Science, clocking in at 100,000 molecules of hydrogen gas every second.

This step is just one part of a series of reactions to split water and make hydrogen gas, but the researchers say the result shows they can learn from nature how to control those reactions to make durable synthetic catalysts for , such as in fuel cells.

In addition, the , an enzyme, uses inexpensive, abundant metals in its design, which the team copied. Currently, these materials -- called catalysts, because they spur reactions along -- rely on expensive metals such as platinum.

"This nickel-based catalyst is really very fast," said coauthor Morris Bullock of the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. "It's about a hundred times faster than the previous catalyst record holder. And from nature, we knew it could be done with abundant and inexpensive nickel or iron."

Stuffing Bonds

Electrical energy is nothing more than electrons. These same electrons are what tie atoms together when they are chemically bound to each other in molecules such as hydrogen gas. Stuffing electrons into is one way to store , which is particularly important for renewable, sustainable energy sources like solar or wind power. Converting the chemical bonds back into flowing electricity when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing allows the use of the stored energy, such as in a that runs on hydrogen.

Electrons are often stored in batteries, but Bullock and his colleagues want to take advantage of the closer packing available in chemicals.

"We want to store energy as densely as possible. Chemical bonds can store a huge amount of energy in a small amount of physical space," said Bullock, director of the Center for Molecular Electrocatalysis at PNNL, one of DOE's Energy Frontier Research Centers. The team also included visiting researcher Monte Helm from Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colo.

Biology stores energy densely all the time. Plants use photosynthesis to store the sun's energy in chemical bonds, which people use when they eat food. And a common microbe stores energy in the bonds of hydrogen gas with the help of a protein called a hydrogenase.

Because the hydrogenases found in nature don't last as long as ones that are built out of tougher chemicals (think paper versus plastic), the researchers wanted to pull out the active portion of the biological hydrogenase and redesign it with a stable chemical backbone.

Two Plus Two Equals One

In this study, the researchers looked at only one small part of splitting water into hydrogen gas, like fast-forwarding to the end of a movie. Of the many steps, there's a part at the end when the catalyst has a hold of two hydrogen atoms that it has stolen from water and snaps the two together.

The catalyst does this by completely dismantling some hydrogen atoms from a source such as water and moving the pieces around. Due to the simplicity of hydrogen atoms, those pieces are positively charged protons and negatively charged electrons. The catalyst arranges those pieces into just the right position so they can be put together correctly. "Two protons plus two electrons equals one molecule of hydrogen gas," says Bullock.

In real life, the protons would come from water, but since the team only examined a portion of the reaction, the researchers used water stand-ins such as acids to test their catalyst.

"We looked at the hydrogenase and asked what is the important part of this?" said Bullock. "The hydrogenase moves the protons around in what we call a proton relay. Where the protons go, the electrons will follow."

A Bauble for Energy

Based on the hydrogenase's proton relay, the experimental catalyst contained regions that dangled off the main structure and attracted protons, called "pendant amines." A pendant amine moves a proton into position on the edge of the catalyst, while a nickel atom in the middle of the catalyst offers a hydrogen atom with an extra electron (that's a proton and two electrons for those counting).

The pendant amine's proton is positive, while the nickel atom is holding on to a negatively charged hydrogen. Positioned close to each other, the opposites attract and the conglomerate solidifies into a molecule, forming hydrogen gas.

With that plan in mind, the team built potential catalysts and tested them. On their first try, they put a bunch of pendant amines around the nickel center, thinking more would be better. Testing their catalyst, they found it didn't work very fast. An analysis of how the catalyst was moving protons and electrons around suggested too many pendant amines got in the way of the perfect reaction. An overabundance of protons made for a sticky catalyst, which pinched it and slowed the hydrogen-gas-forming reaction down.

Like good gardeners, the team trimmed a few pendant amines off their catalyst, leaving only enough to make the protons stand out, ready to accept a negatively charged hydrogen atom.

Fastest Cat in the West

Testing the trimmed catalyst, the team found it performed much better than anticipated. At first they used conditions in which no water was present (remember, they used water stand-ins), and the catalyst could create hydrogen gas at a rate of about 33,000 molecules per second. That's much faster than their natural inspiration, which clocks in at around 10,000 per second.

However, most real-life applications will have water around, so they added water to the reaction to see how it would perform. The catalyst ran three times as fast, creating more than 100,000 hydrogen molecules every second. The researchers think the water might help by moving protons to a more advantageous spot on the pendant amine, but they are still studying the details.

Their catalyst has a drawback, however. It's fast, but it's not efficient. The catalyst runs on electricity -- after all, it needs those to stuff into the chemical bonds -- but it requires more electricity than practical, a characteristic called the overpotential.

Bullock says the team has some ideas on how to reduce the inefficiency. Also, future work will require assembling a catalyst that splits water in addition to making . Even with a high overpotential, the researchers see high potential for this .

Explore further

World's fastest nickel-based complex

More information: Monte L. Helm, Michael P. Stewart, R. Morris Bullock, M. Rakowski DuBois, Daniel L. DuBois, A Synthetic Nickel Electrocatalyst With a Turnover Frequency Above 100,000 s-1 for H2 Production, Science, August 12, 2011, DOI:10.1126/science.1205864
Citation: Inexpensive catalyst that makes hydrogen gas 10 times faster than natural enzyme (2011, August 11) retrieved 19 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 11, 2011
Hydrogen... *sigh*

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for getting rid of fossil fuels, but nature has shown us the way, and hydrocarbons are the most environmentally "compatible" way to store and transport chemical energy.

Hydrogen will never be able to compete with carbon-neutral sustainably produced hydrocarbons that can be directly substituted for gasoline ( butanol ). Tail pipe emissions of CO2 represent CO2 that was removed from the atmosphere to produce the fuel in the first place, hence carbon neutral.

And very importantly, millions of people will still be able to fix their own cars. hundreds of thousands of blue collar mechanics can keep their jobs. And we don't have to divert massive amounts of money to build a new infrastructure for transporting hydrogen gas.

Aug 11, 2011
how much energy in = how much energy out ?

efficiency ?

etc. etc.

Aug 11, 2011
Sanescience: Perhaps that may be true on Earth, but on the Moon and beyond, this may be a more efficient way to process the lunar (and elsewhere) water/ice into usable LOX & LH2, although I recently saw a solar heater/magnetic separator process that might also work as well. No oil wells yet discovered on the moon. Also, if you can fix your own car these days, you either have a very old car or a degree in computer science. I'm a software engineer and I can't (or won't) attempt to fix my car.

Aug 11, 2011

Unfortunately, the Dawn mission has thus far revealed the asteroids probably don't have nearly as much water-ice as previously believed. Vesta looks like it has almost no water-ice at all, except possibly in some of the craters, and even that is more likely rocky ejecta from impacts, and Vesta is the second largest asteroid known.

It's a year or so before Dawn even leaves for the Ceres, and it is admittedly much more massive, but I just don't know what we should legitimately expect to see when Dawn gets there after this.

There are ways to use a closed cycle solar heaters for producing and transporting useful heat and electricity on the Moon, without risky combustion.

Aug 12, 2011

hydrogen cars don't have to be electric-fuel cell driven...duh.

they can have converted internal combustion engines.

Aug 12, 2011

hydrogen cars don't have to be electric-fuel cell driven...duh.

they can have converted internal combustion engines.

Which would be idiotic because they would then require three times the fuel to run.

BMW tried it, quickly scrapped the idea, because they had to fill the entire back end of a station wagon with a big thermos bottle to store the liquid hydrogen, and still got just around 150 miles of range out of it.

Aug 12, 2011
Depending on the rate at which hydrogen is produced, could it not be possible to replace that thermos with electrolysis and the help of this catalyst? Storage has always been an issue with hydrogen so better to cut that step out imo.

Aug 12, 2011
Hydrogen... *sigh*

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for getting rid of fossil fuels, but nature has shown us the way, and hydrocarbons are the most environmentally "compatible" way to store and transport chemical energy.

The problem with any combustion is that you are either going to use something from the atmosphere that doesn't get replenished when making the fuel like oxygen right now. or, and this is true even with hydrogen combustion, nitric oxide is produced which is very harmful, its not all about carbon people! just look at the ethanol craze that people supported without understanding the reality that we would be producing a shitload of acetaldehyde which is EXTREMELY TOXIC to living organisms.

Also hydrogen is looking like a good idea because the infrastructure to produce hydrogen would be in your garage. But the key is using a fuel cell tech, and the hydrogen needs to be solar produced.

Aug 13, 2011
Egnite :

The catalyst needs an energy source to produce hydrogen. And I don't know any renewable energy source that can fit under the hood of a car... So you need to convert it into hydrogen for fuel or electric current for batteries or supercapacitors.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more