Flying machines are YouTube sensation

Have you seen the videos of those amazing flying machines?

( -- The latest YouTube sensation isn’t a puppy that dances to Lady Gaga or a kitten that opens beer bottles. By using unmanned aerial vehicles called quadrotors, two Ph.D. candidates at the School of Engineering and Applied Science have built an autonomous airborne construction crew able to build small structures—and in the process they’ve captured the attention of millions.

Mechanical engineering students Quentin Lindsey, 26, and Daniel Mellinger, 25, wrote algorithms that enable the to discern which specific building piece to pick up, and where it should be placed.

“This is a paradigm changer,” says Penn Engineering Deputy Dean for Education Vijay Kumar, the students’ advisor. “If you look at robots, they do things from the ground up. Think about how the military uses robots on the ground. For the first time we’re able to build things from the top down. This is really a completely new capability being developed.”

Lindsey and Mellinger began writing the algorithms in Penn’s General Robotics, , Sensing and Perception (GRASP) Lab in November. Just three months later, the quadrotors were able to autonomously construct cubic structures, towers, pyramids and walls.

“We tell it what structure to build, then we have a method that figures out the assembly plan—basically a list of parts and where they go,” Mellinger says. “Then the quadrotors line up and quadrotor one picks up part one and puts it in place, quadrotor two picks up part two and puts it in place, and so on.”

The quadrotors “know” where each part is located, and they’re able to grasp it using a gripper, the students explain. The part, made from plastic or PVC pipe, is attached to the body of the structure using a magnet.

“Obviously you’re not going to go to a construction site right now and see these parts, but these are parts you can modify and conceivably scale up and make them into real parts that you could actually build things with,” Lindsey says.

The project is an initial foray into building more complicated structures with quadrotors and robots.

“Full-size helicopters now are used in real construction projects,” Mellinger says. “To think you might be able to add autonomy to that with robotic quadrotors might not be too far off in the future.”

In the meantime, the video “Construction with Quadrotor Teams” has created quite a stir. Just over two minutes long, it shows a squad of Penn quadrotors snatching up construction parts and building a mini-tower in a lab. The quadrotors sound like a swarm of very intense bees, and watching them go about their work is captivating.

The video has received more than 400,000 hits on YouTube, and television’s popular faux newscaster Stephen Colbert recently featured it during the “ThreatDown” segment of his show “The Colbert Report” on Comedy Central.

“For years I have been warning about the threat of robots rising up against their human masters,” Colbert said during the broadcast. “Scientists have reached a new milestone in our enslavement. Flying drones. Today they’re constructing a three-foot tower, tomorrow it’s a sprawling prison for three-foot prisoners.”

While the media attention is flattering and fun, Kumar says it shouldn’t mask the serious science behind the project.

“These robots are completely autonomous, they are not being [remotely controlled],” he explains. “We want to fly into spaces where humans either don’t want to fly or cannot fly. If you can imagine a hostage setting in a building, I can send these guys into the building and they can be the eyes and the ears of rescue personnel outside. I can go into a damaged building after a natural disaster and help victims.”

The researchers say the project may also be a precursor to autonomous robotic construction.

“In our lab we have a lot of experiments and projects that are ground based and we have a lot of experiments that are air based,” Lindsey says. “But we don’t have any that are combined. This is one of the few times where you can actually put the two different kinds of robots together. This is just the first step.”

A successful and satisfying step, Mellinger says. “It’s always fun as an engineer to think about solving a problem and then see it work. It’s just a bonus that it’s gotten so much attention and people like it so much.”

Explore further

Robotic mini-quadrotors can now build towers (w/ Video)

Citation: Flying machines are YouTube sensation (2011, March 22) retrieved 20 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 22, 2011
This is old news and the same video.

Mar 22, 2011
And why arent things like these flying around inside the fukushima reactors, dragging hoses to empty cooling ponds and taking pictures and telemetry and whatnot?

I alway thought construction sites were good places for robotics- excavators, pavers, concrete machines, just about anything. They could also, by themselves, earn WAGES and pay TAXES and their own maintenance, thereby replacing revenues lost by the humans whose jobs they stole. Seriously. This bookkeeping adjustment could generate significant revenues. It can be done already with existing machines.

Mar 22, 2011
Because of the radiation which affects sensors and electronics. The housing should be protected by dense (and heavy) materials to prevent it, making flying of these small bots much less feasible.

Mar 22, 2011
Sadly,they said on CNN that they can't be used in areas with intense radiation,as it kills the electronics and cameras pretty quickly.Robots have to be heavily shielded to have a useful lifetime,and of course,that limits use to ground based robots.

Mar 23, 2011
These flyers look cheap enough to be expendable.

I'll tell ya, wiki has everything, it's like the walmart of the Internet:

-They better get busy. These environments will only become more common. Perhaps this is only one more of the (un)anticipated advantages of a nuclear accident in the country which is the center of robotics r&d? Why were the reactors located above the tsunami but the critical generators were not? Why no redundant outside power lines? The major thing which would destroy a reactor- loss of cooling- and there were no failsafe systems better protected than the reactors themselves.

Mar 24, 2011
Realy makes me wish I could go back to college. This is the kind of learning that is fun and is exactly why its restricted to collegiate level. You'll never see public education providng learning thats actually fun, too many politics to satisfy.

Apr 02, 2011
Yeah, we need one of these aremed with a pistol and a hand grenade to track down Osama Bin Laden.

Unfortunately, the terrorists are more likely to try something like that on us first before our government catches on...

Apr 02, 2011
Yeah, we need one of these aremed with a pistol and a hand grenade to track down Osama Bin Laden.

Unfortunately, the terrorists are more likely to try something like that on us first before our government catches on...

How about this thing? Carrying a pound of C4,it would be a nightmare for the Secret Service: http://www.physor...deo.html
Hopefully,they do not get into the hands of the bad guys..

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more