Stem cell researchers call for research ethics consortium

September 21, 2010, University of South Florida

Two University of South Florida stem cell researchers propose creating an independent national "Stem Cell Research Ethics Consortium" to provide better guidance on stem cell issues for regulatory agencies, law makers and policy makers.

Their recommendation is timely, and came before the recent ruling by a U.S. judge that halted expansion of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. The ruling reversed the attempt to overturn the standing moratorium on federal funding for such research and subsequent appeals.

USF neuroscientists Dr. Paul Sanberg and Dr. Cesario Borlongan are pioneers in the development of umbilical cord blood and for use as therapies for stroke, and cardiovascular disease. Their commentary appears in the journal, Technology and Innovation - The Proceedings of the National Academy of Inventors (Vol. 12 No. 1).

"Two decades of cell-based research has been accompanied by poor management of public discussion regarding ethics," said Dr. Sanberg, executive director of the USF Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair. "Stem cell science has contributed to misperceptions within the public and the research communities, and those misperceptions have hindered the progress of scientific innovation. As a result, clinical application of potentially life-saving treatments to critically ill patients has been delayed and, in some cases, impeded."

According to co-author Dr. Borlongan, vice chairman for research in the USF Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, discussion of the for stem cell-based therapies has often been driven by conflict rather than fact.

"Because of the lack of effective communication between scientists and the public, conflicts have largely played out in the media," said Dr. Borlongan. "In some respects, the failure of the scientific community to effectively address controversy in stem cell research has helped create today's heated, yet poorly informed, debate. We need a Stem Cell Ethics Research Consortium, independent of governmental, political, religious, and scientific organizations, comprised of diverse interests, to sort out the ethical, legal and social issues, and then determine an appropriate mechanism for public discourse and policy making."

The proposed Consortium, conceived as an independent, "honest broker," would be useful in shaping policy on all emerging technologies, not just stem cell science, said Drs. Sanberg and Borlongan. They advocate using members of diverse focus groups to identify issues and discuss them with various communities and return with recommendations. Accordingly, the Consortium's first task would be to establish baseline data about the public view on stem cell science. Collected data should be analyzed to assess the range of options, beliefs and concerns of focus group members' constituents.

The USF researchers envision the Consortium playing a proactive rather than a reactive role and contributing to a deliberate assessment of public opinion about stem cell research aimed at revising or creating meaningful oversight.

"An informed Consortium can then provide ethically-based regulatory options to NIH for use in its ongoing development of guidelines for all stem cell research, not just for embryonic stem cells," said Dr. Sanberg. "The members of the Consortium, enlisted from a wide variety of stakeholders, could evaluate how novel ethical issues in emerging technologies are addressed under current oversight and regulatory structures and where there may be gaps and need for revision or new policy approaches."

The Consortium, suggests Dr. Sanberg, could also be charged with determining the best uses of public funds in investigations of not only stem cells, but other emerging technologies, such as energy, nanotechnology and personalized medicine.

"Bringing together all stakeholders - including the legal, scientific, religious and the public sectors - should allow a much more educated and logical approach in handling the public disbursement of funds for ," concluded Drs. Sanberg and Borlongan.

Explore further: Are there too many stem cell journals?

Related Stories

Are there too many stem cell journals?

August 18, 2010

Are there too many stem cell research journals? This question has been posed by Drs. Paul Sanberg and Cesar Borlongan of the Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair at the University of South Florida. Their article appears ...

Stem- cell research ethics revision urged

September 20, 2005

University of California-San Francisco scientists are urging a revision of stem-cell research ethics in advance of using the procedure to treat disease.

House bill funds embryonic stem cell study

January 10, 2007

As the U.S. House seeks to expand embryonic stem cell research funding, the White House is promoting stem cell development methods that don't harm embryos.

Stem cell specialists face questioning

July 16, 2007

A top panel of experts will face questions of public and scientific concern on stem cell research during an international conference being held at The University of Manchester this week.

Stem cell research from an ethical point of view

June 25, 2008

Stem cell research and the potential use of human embryonic stem cells in clinical therapy is a controversial issue which splits both scientific and public opinion. The current conflict over embryonic stem cells throughout ...

Recommended for you

Microbial communities demonstrate high turnover

January 19, 2018

When Mark Twain famously said "If you don't like the weather in New England, just wait a few minutes," he probably didn't anticipate MIT researchers would apply his remark to their microbial research. But a new study does ...

Hot weather is bad news for bird sperm

January 19, 2018

A new study led by Macquarie University and spanning Sydney and Oslo has shown that exposure to extreme temperatures, such as those experienced during heatwave conditions, significantly reduces sperm quality in zebra finches, ...

More genes are active in high-performance maize

January 19, 2018

When two maize inbred lines are crossed with each other, an interesting effect occurs: The hybrid offspring have a significantly higher yield than either of the two parent plants. Scientists at the University of Bonn have ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.