Nations fail to limit whaling, Japan still hunts

June 23, 2010 By ARTHUR MAX , Associated Press Writer
Japan's fishery minister Yasue Funayama, right, and delegation member Hideo Jinpu attend the opening session of the 62nd International Whaling Commission in Agadir, Morocco, Monday, June 21, 2010. The International Whaling Commission is holding its most important meeting in decades, as nations ponder whether to suspend the porous 25-year ban on commercial hunting in favor of a more enforceable regime of limited whaling. (AP Photo/Abdeljalil Bounhar)

(AP) -- An international effort to truly limit whale hunting collapsed Wednesday, leaving Japan, Norway and Iceland free to keep killing hundreds of mammals a year, even raiding a marine sanctuary in Antarctic waters unchecked.

The breakdown put diplomatic efforts on ice for at least a year, raised the possibility that South Korea might join the whaling nations and raised questions about the global drive to prevent the extinction of the most endangered whale species.

It also revived doubts about the effectiveness and future of the International Whaling Commission. The agency was created after World War II to oversee the hunting of tens of thousands of whales a year but gradually evolved into a body at least partly dedicated to keeping whales from vanishing from the Earth's oceans.

"I think ultimately if we don't make some changes to this organization in the next few years it may be very serious, possibly fatal for the organization - and the whales will be worse off," said former New Zealand Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer.

Japanese officials and environmentalists traded charges of blame after two days of intense, closed-door talks failed to break a deadlock in which the three whaling nations offered to limit their catch but refused to phase it out completely.

About 1,500 animals are killed each year by the three countries. Japan, which kills the majority of whales, insists its hunt is for scientific research - but more whale meat and whale products end up in Japanese restaurants than in laboratories.

Several whale species have been hunted to near extinction, gradually recovering since the ban on commercial whaling went into effect in 1986, while other species like the smaller minke whale are still abundant. But the whale arouses deep passions around the world, because it was one of the first icons of the movement, starting with the popular Save The Whale campaign of the 1970s.

A key sticking point is the sanctity of an ocean region south of Australia that the agency declared a whaling sanctuary in 1994. Despite that declaration, Japanese whalers regularly hunt in , a feeding ground for 80 percent of the world's whales, and the commission has no enforcement powers to stop them.

Australia has already launched a complaint against Japanese whaling at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, the U.N.'s highest court.

Japan delegate Yasue Funayama said her country had offered major concessions and agreed "to elements which are extremely difficult to accept." She blamed the failure of the talks on countries that refused to accept the killing of even a single animal.

Palmer, who worked with 12 countries to help draft a compromise, commended Japan, which he said "showed real flexibility and a real willingness to compromise."

The United States had pushed hard for a deal to bring the three rogue nations back under the commission's control and recognize a limited catch, but finding an acceptable number of whales to kill proved elusive. A proposal drafted by the commission's chairman suggested a limit of 400 whales per year for five years, then going down to 200.

"After nearly three years of discussions, it appears our discussions are at an impasse," said chief U.S. delegate Monica Medina.

Australia, leading the hardline anti-whaling nations, hailed the outcome that preserved the ban on commercial whaling, even though it is flouted by the three whaling states which claim exemptions. Australia was supported by a bloc of Latin American countries.

"The fact that there wasn't a consensus on the compromise is the right place for the commission to be," said Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett.

South Korea acknowledged that it wants the right to hunt whales and may apply to the commission for a quota.

The Koreans opposed the latest proposal because it "allows whaling only for countries currently involved in , which excludes South Korea," said Lee Kang-eun of the department of fishery policies in Seoul.

The 88-nation whaling agency is about evenly split between countries that oppose whaling and nations who advocate sustainable whaling.

Some environmentalists have accused Japan of using its foreign aid to recruit nations into the whaling commission so they support Japan's position. Ten years ago the commission had only 41 members, but today it includes landlocked nations like Mali that have no direct interest in whaling or ocean conservation.

But the delegate from St. Kitts and Nevis, Daven Joseph, told the media and environmental groups to stop such allegations.

"We have been accused of being surrogates. That is not the case," he said.

Many environmentalists blamed Japan for the breakdown.

"If Japan had agreed to a phase out in the Southern Ocean, there would have been a good chance" for a deal, said Wendy Elliott of WWF.

Others expressed relief that the 25-year ban on whaling was not lifted.

"Had it been done here, this deal would have lived in infamy," said Patrick Ramage of the International Fund for Animal Welfare.

The commission's annual meeting ends Friday. Talks now are likely to focus on less controversial issues, such as preventing collisions by and ships, the effects of climate change and proposed Russian oil exploration in the seasonal feeding grounds of the endangered gray whale.

Explore further: Iceland to resume commercial whaling


Related Stories

Nations divided over lifting ban on whale hunt

June 20, 2010

(AP) -- A showdown looms this week over the 25-year ban on commercial whaling: Should it be eased, which might mean fewer whales are killed? Or should it remain - leaving Japan, Norway and Iceland to hunt down as many whales ...

Commission proposes limited commercial whale hunts

April 23, 2010

(AP) -- The International Whaling Commission has proposed allowing the animals to be hunted under strict quotas, bringing the world a step closer to the first legal commercial whaling in nearly 25 years.

Norway fails to fulfill whaling quota

August 21, 2006

Norway says its fishermen will not be able to fulfill this year's whaling quota, with about 500 minke whales caught out of the quota's 1,052.

Japan may quit whaling commission if ban stays put

June 15, 2010

(AP) -- Japan is considering withdrawing from the International Whaling Commission if no progress is made toward easing an international ban on commercial whaling, its fisheries minister said Tuesday.

Australia: Japan's whaling program a sham

March 28, 2006

Australian officials say a 10-year project examining whales off Australia's Antarctic territory prove Japan's whaling program has no scientific basis.

Recommended for you

Energy-saving LEDs boost light pollution worldwide

November 22, 2017

They were supposed to bring about an energy revolution—but the popularity of LED lights is driving an increase in light pollution worldwide, with dire consequences for human and animal health, researchers said Wednesday.

Camponotini ant species have their own distinct microbiomes

November 22, 2017

Camponotini ant species have their own distinct microbiomes and the bacteria may also vary by developmental stage, according to a study published November 22, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Manuela Oliveira Ramalho ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 23, 2010
What a horrific bias in the title and basic premise of this posting. Yes, the party that introduced the rule to overturn the moratorium hoped that making whaling LEGAL might actually reduce the number killed, but that does not make it the obvious anti-whaling position - some would say the opposite. Here's a hint: If you're siding with Japan (and their constant bribery) on whaling, you're probably not anti-whaling.

Japan's hunts remain illegal, and if they follow through on their threat to leave the IWC, the killings will be even more obviously illegal. This frees Sea Shepherd (the only group that matters at this point?) to finish their work of embarassing Japan into finally doing the right thing.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.