Rising CO2 levels threaten crops and food quality

May 13, 2010

Rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide interfere with plants’ ability to convert nitrate into protein and could threaten food quality, according to a new study by researchers at the University of California, Davis. The scientists suggest that, as global climate change intensifies, it will be critical for farmers to carefully manage nitrogen fertilization in order to prevent losses in crop productivity and quality.

The study, which examined the impact of increased carbon dioxide levels on wheat and the mustard plant Arabidopsis, will be published in the May 14 issue of the journal Science.

"Our findings suggest that scientists cannot examine the response of crops to global simply in terms of rising carbon dioxide levels or higher temperatures,” said lead author Arnold Bloom, a professor in UC Davis’ Department of Plant Sciences.

“Instead, we must consider shifts in plant nitrogen use that will alter food quality and even pest control, as lower protein levels in plants will force both people and pests to consume more to meet their nutritional requirements," Bloom said.

Climate change, CO2 and agriculture

Historical records have documented that the concentration of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere has increased by 39 percent since 1800. If current projections hold true, the concentration will increase by an additional 40 to 140 percent by the end of the century.

This trend is of concern to agriculture because elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have been shown to decrease the rates of photorespiration, the naturally occurring chemical process that combines oxygen with carbohydrates in plants.

At first, this reduction in photorespiration boosts photosynthesis, the complementary process by which plants grow by using sunlight to turn water and carbohydrates into chemical energy in the form of plant sugars. In time, however, the increase in the rate of photosynthesis tapers off as the plants adjust to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide, and plant growth slows.

The nitrogen connection

Nitrogen is the mineral element that plants and other living organisms require in the greatest quantity to survive and grow. Plants obtain most of their nitrogen from the soil and, in the moderate climates of the United States, absorb most of it through their roots in the form of . In plant tissues, those compounds are assimilated into organic nitrogen compounds, which have a major influence on the plant’s growth and productivity.

Earlier research has shown that when atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations increase by 50 percent, the nitrogen status of plants declines significantly.

More specifically, findings from previous research by Bloom and colleagues suggested that elevated levels of carbon dioxide decreased photorespiration and inhibited nitrate assimilation in plant shoots.

New UC Davis study

In their most recent study, Bloom’s team examined the influence of elevated carbon dioxide levels and, in some cases, low atmospheric oxygen concentrations, on nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis plants using five different methods.

Data from all five methods confirm that elevated levels of carbon dioxide inhibit nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis plants. The researchers note that this effect could explain why earlier studies by other researchers have documented a 7.4-percent to 11-percent decrease in wheat grain protein and a 20-percent decrease in total Arabidopsis protein under elevated carbon dioxide levels.

“This indicates that as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise and nitrate assimilation in plant tissues diminishes, crops will become depleted in organic nitrogen compounds, including protein, and food quality will suffer,” Bloom said. “Increasing nitrogen fertilization might compensate for slower nitrate assimilation rates, but this might not be economically or environmentally feasible.”

He noted that farmers might be able to increase their use of nitrogen-rich ammonium fertilizers to ease the bottleneck of nitrate assimilation in crops but would have to carefully manage fertilizer applications to avoid toxic accumulations of ammonium in the plants.

To develop solutions for dealing with the impact of major increases in atmospheric levels on crops, further research is needed on how assimilate nitrate and ammonium, Bloom said.

Working with Bloom on this study were Martin Burger of UC Davis’ Department of Land, Air and Water Resource; Jose Salvador Rubio Asensio of UC Davis’ Department of Plant Sciences; and Asaph B. Cousins, currently of the School of Biological Sciences at Washington State University.

Explore further: New model revises estimates of terrestrial carbon dioxide uptake

Related Stories

Replicating Climate Change to Forecast its Effects

December 17, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists are replicating the effects of climate change to see what the future holds for soybeans, wheat and the soils where they grow.

Nitrogen rain makes bogs contribute to climate change

December 11, 2006

High levels of nitrogenous compounds can make bogs give off more carbon dioxide, thereby adding to the greenhouse effect. This has been shown by the plant ecologist Hakan Rydin in an article published this week in the Proceedings ...

Rule reveals CO2 emissions of plant life

January 26, 2006

Minnesota researchers have found a universal rule regulating plant metabolism that may also offer a key to calculating plants' carbon dioxide emissions.

Recommended for you

New Amazon threat? Deforestation from mining

October 18, 2017

Sprawling mining operations in Brazil are destroying much more of the iconic Amazon forest than previously thought, says the first comprehensive study of mining deforestation in the world's largest tropical rainforest.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (4) May 13, 2010
Worse than we thought (TM). I remember some previous study that claimed that increased CO2 would increase plant growth, but not uniformly. Bad plants (poison oak) benefited the most. Clowns in a Global warming science circus.
2.3 / 5 (6) May 13, 2010
I see you have nothing to actually challenge in the article, except you conflate it with other studies and attempt to compare them incorrectly. Why do you even bother with this site when you really don't seem to understand any of the articles?
3 / 5 (2) May 13, 2010
Wait a minute, the authors of the paper were employed by Martin's Burger chain at the moment?
1 / 5 (3) May 16, 2010
I wish that the article were more detailed about what they did and the methodology used in the study. Guess I will have to wait for the publication of the article.

But, one preliminary comment I can make is that potted plants in lab environments tend to introduce various anomalies into experiments that would not otherwise occur in nature. If this study group used a potted-plant-in-a-lab scenario, the study may be flawed from the start.
1 / 5 (2) May 22, 2010
Holy crap! Just read the supporting documentation and methodology of the experiment. This certainly is not the natural way to grow plants. Several factors are there that would introduce all sorts of anomalies into the equation. Anyone who doubts that should read the supporting documentation in addition to the paper itself.

This study is worse than a potted-plant-in-a-lab scenario....
1 / 5 (2) May 26, 2010
There I go again, spouting the usual diatribic crap! Of course I should understand the requirement of experimental techniques to be reproducible and the importance of controls...but being an anti-scientists I couldn't give a damn! :)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.