Oceans losing ability to absorb greenhouse gas

January 11, 2010 by Jennifer Fitzenberger, UC Irvine

UCI Earth scientist Francois Primeau and colleagues report that oceans are growing less efficient at absorbing vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Photo: Steve Zylius
(PhysOrg.com) -- Like a dirty filter, the Earth's oceans are growing less efficient at absorbing vast amounts of carbon dioxide, the major greenhouse gas produced by fossil-fuel burning, reports a study co-authored by Francois Primeau, UC Irvine Earth system science associate professor.

The oceans largely kept up when began soaring in the 1950s, but the absorption rate has slowed since the 1980s and dropped off even more noticeably since 2000, according to the recent study in the journal Nature.

Here, Primeau answers questions about the research, which suggests the oceans may not be as reliable as previously thought at guarding against global warming.

Q: Why are the oceans absorbing less ?

A: Oceanographers refer to the time since water was last at the surface as its “age.” The age of water masses in the ocean ranges from zero to more than 1,000 years, but the bulk of waters that upwell to the surface typically are less than a few decades old. Because older water was in contact with the atmosphere at a time when airborne carbon dioxide levels were lower, it contains less manmade carbon. On the other hand, younger water tends to have higher levels of this carbon. In particular, water that is less than a few decades old has man-made carbon levels that reflect the large ramp-up in emissions that began in the 1950s. This water is now showing its age by already having significant levels of carbon when re-exposed to the atmosphere. The extra carbon is making surface water more acidic. The resulting change in seawater chemistry is diminishing the oceans’ ability to absorb carbon dioxide.

Q: How was the absorption slowdown identified?

A: When we measure the carbon concentration of seawater, it’s not possible to distinguish carbon that originated from fossil-fuel burning and the large background level of natural carbon. So instead of trying to directly measure the increase in ocean carbon, we created a based on tens of thousands of ship-based measurements collected over the last 20 years that allowed us to determine where and how long ago the water in the ocean’s interior was last at the surface. The model was then used to track all of the ocean’s water masses backward in time to when they last exchanged carbon dioxide with the atmosphere. We reconstructed a year-by-year inventory of the manmade gas in the ocean from 1765 to 2008. This allowed us to identify trends in the uptake of human-generated carbon dioxide.

Q: What effects might this have on global climate change?

A: Carbon dioxide is a that contributes to global warming. If the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide emissions more slowly, more of them will stay in the atmosphere for a longer time, leading to higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels - which contribute to global warming. To reverse this cycle, we have to bring down levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. We can do this by reducing the amount of energy we waste and by choosing food produced with as little fossil fuel as possible.

Q: How did you contribute to this study?

A: My contribution was to formulate the mathematical model that integrated ship-based data on the ocean’s temperature, salinity and chlorofluorocarbon, radiocarbon, oxygen and phosphate content to help us understand the invasion of manmade carbon without having to know the actual circulation of the .

Explore further: Heating from carbon dioxide will increase five-fold over next millennia

Related Stories

Oceans could slurp up carbon dioxide to fight global warming

November 19, 2007

Researchers in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are proposing a new method for reducing global warming that involves building a series of water treatment plants that enhance the ability of the ocean to absorb carbon dioxide ...

North Sea efficient sink for carbon dioxide

October 10, 2005

A relatively large number of algae grow in the North Sea. These form the basis for a much richer food chain than that found in the Atlantic Ocean. Dutch-sponsored researcher Yann Bozec calculated that coastal seas such as ...

If not in atmosphere, where does carbon go?

November 2, 2007

A prominent atmospheric scientist Monday (Oct. 29) called for more research into natural carbon “sinks,” which today absorb almost half of man-made carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere and which will play a large ...

Recommended for you

Semimetals are high conductors

March 18, 2019

Researchers in China and at UC Davis have measured high conductivity in very thin layers of niobium arsenide, a type of material called a Weyl semimetal. The material has about three times the conductivity of copper at room ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.5 / 5 (2) Jan 12, 2010
This is an important study, but if we expect to convince people that there is a problem, more details are necessary to back up claims. What model did he develop? What evidence suggests that the model is accurate? I believe that the earth is in trouble, but more empirical evidence must be presented in such stories if progress is to be made.
3 / 5 (6) Jan 12, 2010
1) Where is the raw data?
2) What are the assumptions made to allow designing a model?
3) Who proved the model is programmaticaly and logically correct?
My first problem with all models if whether they are formally correct in construction. I am unaware of any effort to do this. The main reason for not doing so is because it would be expensive and time consuming.
Another reason is the general attitude take towards software development, it's
magic. The people able to do that quality of work are few and prominent in their field. Add to this the chemistry and thermodynamics experts of an equal level and you won't have enough glory left over to the drum beaters.
2.6 / 5 (5) Jan 12, 2010
Yes, this fits quite nicely into the reality of how an atmospheric CO2 increase lags temperature increase. Thanks associate professor Primeau.

What's that? Feedback system?

Oh, you lovable, naive scamp. Sorry, no. Actually it's just the carbon cycle and that subtle chemistry you claim is bringing catastrophic warming is actually quite insignificant.

Thanks for the thought though.

By the way, how much was your grant? The taxpayers would like it back please. Thank you.
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 15, 2010
By the way, how much was your grant? The taxpayers would like it back please. Thank you.

Oh? You mean like the economic recovery monies that Dr. Mann got to study global warming?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.