Increasing Electric Car Battery Performance

Lithium-ion Car Battery

( -- Researchers have found that by replacing conventional graphite electrodes with silicon nanotube electrodes, lithium-ion batteries can store 10 times more charge.

The research was performed at the Stanford University and Hanyang University in Ansan, Korea. The joint effort is between the Universities and LG Chem, a Korean company, who makes lithium ion batteries for the Chevy Volt.

In a conventional Hybrid Car, using today's technology, a charge only last 30 minutes.

A battery is charged by the movement of lithium ions from the cathode to the . By replacing the electrode with , much more energy can be stored because the silicon absorbs larger amounts of lithium in the charging process.

Because silicon anodes absorb up to 10 times more lithium by weight, its volume also increase by 4 times. This can be a disadvantage as the material becomes brittle and can crack after the battery has been charged and discharged a few times. By developing a nanostructured silicon design, researchers have found that the silicon material can better withstand the stress.

There are some major challenges ahead before the silicon nanotube electrodes can be used in electric car batteries. One of the problems is getting back all the energy from the silicon anode after the battery has been charged. The battery must be able to be charged hundreds or thousands of times before this type of battery can be used in . As of today this has not yet be shown.

Electric car batteries, incorporating silicon nanotube electrodes, could be on the market in three years. It's too early to determine whether this new technology will add to the cost of lithium batteries.

More information: Silicon Nanotube Battery Anodes; Nano Letters, DOI: 10.1021/nl902058c

Via: Technology Review

© 2009

Explore further

Coming Soon: Improved Lithium Ion Batteries?

Citation: Increasing Electric Car Battery Performance (2009, September 23) retrieved 20 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 23, 2009
i'd like to see how well silicon nanocoils on quartz inlays would do for energy storage.

Sep 23, 2009
Just changed the battery in the clock in the garage. It was one of those energizer batteries.

The only thing it ran was a small lcd clock,,,it
exploded !! Oh yeah, batteries NOT.

Sep 23, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Sep 24, 2009
Last year some of the Plug-in vehicle manufactures were requiring battery leasing, so customers may exchange batteries before the old one dies.

For plug-in customers willing to pay a premium for bleeding edge performance, leasing models should accommodate any experimental battery requiring more frequent replacement.

Sep 24, 2009
I've never heard of that 1965 breakthrough, but attributing its failure to a big oil conspiracy is not believable. If it really did work, was published, and other researchers across the world really did reproduce it, how could big oil possibly suppress it for 44 years? Destroy the publications and patents and kill or intimidate into silence everyone who knew the process? And how could they prevent battery manufacturers, who spend billions on R&D to eke out small gains to beat their competition, from using that technology (which would be off patent for the past two decades).

Far more likely that it failed for one of the same reasons the vast majority of "breakthroughs" we read about every day fail -- production scalability, high cost, intractable quality control problems, product safety and longevity, or just plain hype that far exceeded reality.

Sep 24, 2009
Wow finfife. You got ranked a 1 right away. And that for bringing up a good point.
One thing to consider, though, is catching something in the early phases is much easier to stop. Offer a few people a couple million a piece to forget about it. Happens a lot in all different places.
Here's an example: Los Angeles had an excellent subway system at the beginning of the 20th century. The auto industry decided it wanted to sell cars there and after world war II was able to. They purchased the subway (under whatever pretense; it doesn't matter) and just let it sit there. Effectively forcing people to buy cars (or take the bus).
Now think about what large companies have the ability to do.
I'm not saying that this battery thing was a conspiracy, but don't dismiss it without digging deeper.

Sep 24, 2009
and there was likely nothing special about Tesla's burial by Westinghouse either . . . ?

Sep 25, 2009
finfife. I certainly didn't rank you a 1. hopefully that wasn't you that ranked me down. Regardless, though, I think it's comical that people here will rank you down when they don't agree. It apparently doesn't matter if it's relevant, or if it's completely factual. My last comment was not wild speculation, it is fact. Look it up. The place is all but buried now under LA. In fact it would have been forgotten about had not a security guard found a door a few decades ago and decided to open it. It was that "rediscovery" that made everyone realize that a building had been built over such a historical place.

Sep 26, 2009

We don't really need breakthroughs as we already have batteries that work fine. The biggest problems with our racers is keeping the axles from snapping. Tesla had to get rid of their 2 speed transmission because it kept breaking.

We have motors/controllers that hit 600kw or about 800hp and batteries that put that out.

The Killacycle EV MC does the 1/4 mile in 7.9sec at 168mph. Do we really need more performance?

What we need is car companies to build them. BTW oil companies do stiffle EV's. Chevron bought the NiMh patents and stopped Panasonic/ Toyota and everyone else from building EV size batteries.

Oct 26, 2009
An order of magnitude of efficiency is remarkable, there are no such giant strides on the horizon for internal combustion or fuel cell technologies.
This report seems to be covering some of the earliest research in this area. The initial nanotube technology did not retain this capacity after just a few charge cycles, leading Dr. Cui to explore alternate nanowire chemistries. One that was recently published was regarding “core shell” nanowires, wherein there’s a crystalline nanowire core to conduct the electrons and an amorphous surface, which has better stability. This comes at the cost of only a 3x improvement in energy density over graphite. At this point in the research, they’re already up to 90% capacity retention after 100 cycles.
Even a applicable 3x improvement would be a real game changer, making electric cars more competitive in terms of cost, travel range and battery weight effect related fuel efficiency.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more