Children raised by gay couples show good progress through school: study

Aug 31, 2010 BY ADAM GORLICK

(PhysOrg.com) -- By mining data from the 2000 Census, sociologist Michael Rosenfeld figured out the rates at which kids raised by gay and straight couples repeated a grade during elementary or middle school. He found that children of same-sex parents have essentially the same educational achievement as their peers growing up in heterosexual households.

In nearly every discussion, debate or lawsuit about , the talk at some point turns to family values.

Do make for good parents? Will their children - whether adopted, conceived with the help of a surrogate or brought in from a pre-existing relationship - adjust, adapt and succeed in a world dominated by traditional families?

The answers usually depend on who's giving them, and come dressed in anecdotes and colored by bias. But Stanford Michael Rosenfeld brings something new to the conversation: facts and figures derived from the country's largest data bank - the U.S. Census.

In a study published this month in the journal Demography, Rosenfeld concludes that children being raised by same-sex couples have nearly the same as children raised by married heterosexual couples.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

By mining data from the 2000 Census, Rosenfeld was able to figure out the rates at which children in all types of families repeated a grade during elementary or middle school. According to his findings, nearly 7 percent of children raised by heterosexual married couples were held back a year, while about 9.5 percent of children living with adults identifying themselves as same-sex partners repeated a grade.

The difference between the groups pretty much vanishes when taking into account that the were slightly more educated and wealthier than most gay parents, Rosenfeld said.

"The show that having parents who are the same gender is not in itself any disadvantage to children," he said. "Parents' income and education are the biggest indicators of a child's success. Family structure is a minor determinant."

Rosenfeld's findings have been cited by lawyers fighting Proposition 8, the gay marriage ban passed by California voters in 2008. A federal court judge recently overturned the ban, but his ruling is under appeal.

Rosenfeld's study shows that children of gay and married couples had lower grade-repetition rates than their peers raised by opposite-sex unmarried couples and single parents. And all children living in some type of family environment did much better than those living in group housing. Those who were awaiting adoption or placement in a foster home were held back about 34 percent of the time.

"One of the fundamental issues in modern family law that differs from state to state is whether same-sex couples can adopt," Rosenfeld said. "My research makes clear that there's a huge advantage to kids to be out of the care of the state and into the care of any family, even if the family is not perfectly optimal."

Educators, policymakers and social scientists have long known that children left back in school are at greater risk than their peers for not finishing high school and getting into trouble.

Because gays and lesbians make up such a tiny sliver of the American population - only 1 percent - it has been difficult for researchers to conduct a representative study of how their children perform in the classroom. And gay marriage opponents have criticized earlier studies for having sample sizes that are too small.

"Sample size is power," Rosenfeld said. "And the census is the biggest sample we have. This study is based on a sample of thousands and thousands of kids."

Most personal decisions about gay marriage are based on gut feelings, religious beliefs and individual experiences. Rosenfeld knows his research isn't going to change the minds of most people opposed to same-sex unions. But he has added new data to the debate that helps debunk assertions - whether based on a lack of knowledge or some unfounded fear - that children raised by gay couples cannot thrive.

"Social scientists have an obligation to shed light where they can on issues that are roiling the public," he said. "Sometimes we have to throw up our hands and admit that something is unknowable. But in this case, we could bring some real hard data to bear on an area that was otherwise really in the dark."

Explore further: LGBT advocacy within companies works

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sociologist: Stepfamilies hard to define

Dec 11, 2006

The changing face of the U.S. family is nothing like the Cleavers or the Andersons of television lore, an Iowa State University sociologist said.

Do children need both a mother and a father?

Jan 21, 2010

The presumption that children need both a mother and a father is widespread. It has been used by proponents of Proposition 8 to argue against same-sex marriage and to uphold a ban on same-sex adoption.

Recommended for you

LGBT advocacy within companies works

34 minutes ago

Activism in the workplace surrounding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues is often effective at changing a company's social policies – even before government mandates bring about change, ...

College education not always about what you have

17 hours ago

Students who have books and computers at home, who take extramural cultural classes, and whose parents give advice and take part in school activities are most likely to enroll for a four-year college degree. Also, more American ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (3) Aug 31, 2010
Isn't it strange that such a minority of people can raise such a high profile in the public mind?
Or maybe not.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (1) Aug 31, 2010
Isn't it strange that such a minority of people can raise such a high profile in the public mind?
The high profile comes from the constant bigotry expressed towards gay people by individuals like yourself. If you left them alone, no one would be that interested in them. Since your ilk need to make up stories to attempt to "defend the sanctity of the family from the evil homosexual" science must go in and determine the facts, all of which are in stark contrast to your assertions of immorality and evil.
napdaw
5 / 5 (2) Aug 31, 2010
There are other factors at play here other than if these kids have gay parents or not. Kids who are adopted have unique issues of their own that could affect their success at school (ex. attachment disorder).
hyonfesta
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2010
Thank god. At least something is good in a gay marriage.
http://www.health...ews.html
getgoa
1 / 5 (1) Sep 04, 2010
This article belongs with the bullying article where the students do worst because they are bullied. No question if someone found out that 1% percent of the pop. is alienating themselves. The gay pop. knows they are alienating themselves beyond curiousity.

The facts are this article and others on this website does not support serious gay rights.

This is not England where gays are knighted to royalty they can move--Sodomy is a sin seriously not just out of curiousity.

People should realize they are being turned out from the World War--Especially in USA and England.