Researchers Develop Unique Method to Improve Testing for Small Delay Defects in Semiconductors

Jul 26, 2010

Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), the National Science Foundation and researchers from the University of Connecticut and Duke University have found a new way to significantly improve the screening of small delay defects (SDDs) commonly found in semiconductors.

Using a much reduced pattern count in the chip testing process, this new methodology will efficiently detect SDDs and help improve the quality and reliability of future . As semiconductor technologies migrate to smaller and smaller technology nodes, the complexity and density of designs and functionality significantly increases. SDDs - often a result of physical defects as well as on-chip noise from process variations, power supply noise and crosstalk - have become a major concern for high-quality testing.

SDDs are a type of timing defect that are difficult to fully and efficiently target with the current transition-delay fault (TDF) ATPG methods. Current commercially available timing-aware ATPGs for detecting SDDs use a very large pattern set and CPU runtime. They assume that SDDs appear only as physical defects in the circuit. However, the methodology developed by UConn and Duke researchers uses a reduced pattern set and provides higher quality test patterns for screening against SDDs.

“This is a major breakthrough for chip testing,” said Mohammad Tehranipoor, associate professor of Electrical and , University of Connecticut, and Krishnendu Chakrabarty, professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University. “By evaluating each test pattern according to its unique paths before applying the patterns to silicon, it allows the industry to select only high-quality patterns for testing. This will help to dramatically improve the quality of the test process and reduce the delay test costs while testers budgets.”

With the support from SRC and NSF, the UConn and Duke researchers exploited N-detect pattern sets in terms of low CPU runtime and efficient SDD detection and developed a novel metric to evaluate each test pattern in the N-detect pattern set. The new methodology is also capable of taking into account small delays induced by power supply noise and crosstalk, as well as process variations.

The researchers plan to extend their work to different kinds of patterns such as stuck-at and bridging patterns.

“As technology nodes continue to shrink, the metric used for SDD pattern selection could provide the industry with a valuable opportunity to increase test quality while meeting test time and tester memory requirements,” said William Joyner, director of Computer-Aided Design and Test at SRC.

Efforts are currently under way to bring this technology to the commercial industry. The chip testing methodology is currently being evaluated on silicon with researchers at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), under the leadership of Dr. Mahmut Yilmaz, an AMD senior design engineer who studied at Duke under the supervision of Chakrabarty.

Explore further: Surveillance a part of everyday life

Provided by Semiconductor Research Corporation

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New Targets May Hit Bull’s-Eye for Chip Makers

Dec 07, 2006

The bull’s-eye solution to the semiconductor industry’s hunt for more exact means to measure the relative positions of ever-tinier devices squeezed by the millions onto silicon chips might be new types of targets, and ...

Recommended for you

Hoverbike drone project for air transport takes off

2 hours ago

What happens when you cross a helicopter with a motorbike? The crew at Malloy Aeronautics has been focused on a viable answer and has launched a crowdfunding campaign to support its Hoverbike project, "The ...

Study shows role of media in sharing life events

3 hours ago

To share is human. And the means to share personal news—good and bad—have exploded over the last decade, particularly social media and texting. But until now, all research about what is known as "social sharing," or the ...

User comments : 0