Patent holder sues smart phone makers over patents

Jul 09, 2010 By PETER SVENSSON , AP Technology Writer

(AP) -- The patent-holding company that won a settlement of more than $600 million from the maker of the BlackBerry said Friday it has sued six other companies in the smart phone industry.

Patent company NTP Inc. is suing Apple Inc., Google Inc., Microsoft Corp., HTC Corp., Motorola Inc. and LG Electronics Inc., claiming infringement of the same patents that were at issue in its case against BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd.

The lawsuit against RIM ended with a $612.5 million settlement in 2006. However, changes in court practices have reduced NTP's power to win large settlements, and if NTP prevails, it's likely to receive much less from each defendant this time.

Microsoft and Apple said they had no comment. The other targets did not respond to requests for comment. The lawsuits were filed Thursday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Richmond, Va.

NTP was founded by Thomas Campana, an inventor, and Don Stout, a lawyer. Campana worked on wireless e-mail technology in the early 1990s, but never commercialized the technology. He died in 2004.

In the aftermath of the RIM settlement, NTP's patents have been re-examined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and many of their claims have been thrown out. But the office upheld three of the 10 patent claims that RIM was found to have infringed, said Stout, NTP's president.

"Now we have to move forward," Stout said. "We hope we can resolve these cases without having to go to trial."

NTP now faces a different, and more difficult, legal environment than it did when it sued RIM, said Alexander Poltorak, chairman and CEO of General Patent Corp., which represents small companies and individual inventors against larger companies.

The main threat NTP wielded against RIM was that of a court-ordered halt of the sale of BlackBerrys and the operation of its e-mail service in the U.S. But a Supreme Court ruling in 2006, a few months after the RIM settlement, made such injunctions much harder to obtain for "non-practicing entities" such as NTP, which don't have commercial products.

That means the defendants have less reason to settle for large amounts, and NTP's real hope is that the court will decide that the defendants have to pay it damages and royalties on patent-infringing products, Poltorak said. It can do that for products made up to six years ago. Its patents expire in 2012, which means there won't be many future royalties to collect.

The lawsuit against Apple names its iPhone, iPad, server software and MobileMe information sync service. Taiwan-based HTC makes some of the most sought-after alternatives to the iPhone, such as the EVO 4G, sold by Sprint Nextel Corp., and the Google Nexus One, sold by Google. Apple and HTC have sued each other over patents on various smart phone functions.

Google and Microsoft don't make smart phones themselves, but NTP's suits cite the software they provide to phone manufacturers.

In 2006 and 2007, NTP sued the nation's four largest wireless carriers - AT&T Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile USA, Sprint Nextel Corp. and Verizon Wireless - and phone maker Palm Inc. over the same patents. Those lawsuits are still pending.

Explore further: Bose sues Beats over headphone patents

3.3 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Motorola and Research In Motion settle dispute

Jun 11, 2010

Handset makers Motorola Inc. and Research In Motion Ltd. said Friday they have settled a patent complaint over mobile technology that Motorola brought to the U.S. International Trade Commission earlier this year.

BlackBerry playing 'Russian routlette'?

Dec 02, 2005

A federal judge this week ruled that the maker of the BlackBerry mobile e-mail device did not have a binding settlement deal with the company that holds the patent for the wireless technology -- an order that continues the ...

Microsoft reaches licensing deal on HTC phones

Apr 28, 2010

(AP) -- Microsoft Corp. says it has patents covering phones that use Google Inc.'s Android software - but unlike Apple Inc., Microsoft has reached a licensing deal rather than suing over the software.

Google backs HTC in Apple patent suit

Mar 03, 2010

Google on Wednesday threw its backing behind HTC, maker of the Internet giant's Nexus One smartphone, after Apple accused the Taiwan company of infringing on iPhone patents.

Recommended for you

Report: China to declare Qualcomm a monopoly

21 hours ago

(AP)—Chinese regulators have concluded Qualcomm Inc., one of the biggest makers of chips used in mobile devices, has a monopoly, a government newspaper reported Friday.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sanescience
5 / 5 (3) Jul 09, 2010
Absurd. The patent system is broken. One guy who contributes nothing to society can leech to such an extent off other peoples hard work.
Parsec
3 / 5 (4) Jul 09, 2010
Its altogether unclear to me that someone who invents such basic fundamental technology that forms the basis for the cell phone and wireless industry contributes nothing, or is a leech.

The patent system needs some modifications, I agree. But to call it broken is vastly overstating the problem. The way I see it, if someone invents a technology, companies that use it should pay for the right to do so.
pubwvj
not rated yet Jul 09, 2010
Kill the patent trolls.
Ban patents.
Sanescience
5 / 5 (2) Jul 10, 2010
Parsec: This is not a general philosophy case. These patents are for processes that involve fairly obvious solutions that were already in use but no one thought to patent.

Don Stout, is a lawyer. Campana worked on wireless e-mail technology in the early 1990s, but never commercialized the technology. He died in 2004.

NTP makes nothing, contributes nothing. NTP waited for companies to develop deep pockets before suing. the patents in question expire in 2012.
petedskier
not rated yet Jul 10, 2010
I had commented on a similar topic in MacWorld, http://www.macwor...ey.html.

The problem is that while it is easy for the patent system to deal with real things, a gizmo or a chemical compound, it does not handle software very well. It is not clear what may or may not constitute a valid patent. An algorithm cannot be patented, but a software program can. An idea cannot be patented, but the object of an idea can.

In the MacWorld article, I felt the patent cited was of dubious value. Its broadest claims were too general (a cell phone) and its narrowest claims were vague. Since patents exchange knowledge to the public for a right to exclude its use by others, it would be interesting to learn what knowledge NTP was disclosing.
COCO
not rated yet Jul 13, 2010
the clowns at RIM capitulated and retreated like school girls - they set the standard.