Future of commercial whaling ban rests with Japan

Jun 18, 2010 By JAY ALABASTER , Associated Press Writer
In this March 12, 2010 file photo, a Metropolitan Police Department boat, foreground, escorts the Japan's government-backed research whaling vessel Shonan Maru No. 2 on the way to Harumi pier in Tokyo, carrying anti-whaling activisit Pete Bethune, captain of the Sea Shepherd vessel Ady Gil, on board shortly before Japan's coast guard arrested the New Zealander for illegally boarding the Japanese ship in February. Japan is considering withdrawing from the International Whaling Commission if no progress is made toward easing an international ban on commercial whaling, its fisheries minister said Tuesday, June 15, 2010. (AP Photo/Itsuo Inouye, File)

(AP) -- A quarter-century ban on commercial whaling - one of the world's most successful preservation agreements - could crumble altogether if conservationists cannot persuade Japan to cut back on the tradition it champions.

Delegates to next week's meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Morocco will consider whether to allow limited commercial hunts if Tokyo stops pursuing in a southern sanctuary. Even adamant opponents are willing to sanction limited hunts on that condition, but it appears to be more than the Japanese are willing to concede.

"Japan holds the key, because Japan is the only country that is whaling in the southern ocean, the only country whaling in the sanctuary, the only country doing high-seas, long-distance whaling," said Susan Lieberman, Director of International Policy at the Pew Environment Group, which supports allowing some whaling.

At stake is the future of the IWC, the world's sole whaling regulator. After whaling devastated many species, the commission instituted a ban in 1986, but Japan, Norway and Iceland harvest animals annually under its various exceptions.

"The moratorium has been one of the single most effective conservation achievements of the century, but it's not working currently in the sense that several governments can whale completely outside the IWC's control," said Wendy Elliott, who will lead a group from the WWF at the meeting.

The frigid Antarctic has become the focus of the heated debate. The area was declared a sanctuary in 1994, but Japan hunts there under a scientific exemption. Norway and Iceland conduct much smaller hunts near their own coasts, fueling less anger from opponents.

Each year in the Antarctic, Japan's whalers clash among the ice floes with militant anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd. On the hunt this year, the lost a catamaran in a collision and one member was arrested when he boarded a Japanese whaler at sea.

Antarctic whaling has also boiled over into diplomatic channels. Australia is taking Japan to the International Court of Justice, and the U.S. plus a host of other countries have come out against the Antarctic hunts.

Japan maintains more scientific analysis is required in the region. It mostly catches Antarctic minke , aiming for about a thousand per year but often catching far less due to protesters.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature's Red List, a neutral listing of animal populations worldwide, says there is not enough data to determine if the species is threatened or not, although the population is "clearly in the hundreds of thousands."

Agreement within the IWC appears agonizingly close. Since a proposal was floated in April by the IWC chairman, some from the anti-whaling side, including the U.S. delegation, Greenpeace, the WWF and the Pew Group have said they would consider voting to allow limited hunts, and Japan has signaled it may accept taking less whales than it does now.

But in the days leading up to the conference that begins Monday, the sticking point remains the southern sanctuary. Any agreement will be voted on by the full 88 member countries, with the goal to reach complete consensus and eliminate all whaling under objections and exceptions.

Two whaling officials at Japan's powerful Fisheries Agency, which sets the national agenda on whaling issues, said the country will not give up its Antarctic hunts, with one calling them "crucial." Both asked to remain anonymous because they weren't authorized to speak publicly.

Makoto Ito, managing director of Kyodo Senpaku Co., the company that runs the annual Antarctic hunt, said he didn't think they should be ended, because "we need to collect more data."

Japan's refusal to give up its Antarctic hunt puzzles even observers within the country. Current coastal catches, also conducted for scientific research, provide fresher meat and are cheaper. IWC approval would allow whalers to switch to commercial hunts and chase bigger whales, as well as shield Japan from international criticism.

Even if research proved the hunted whale populations were sustainable in the southern region, whether anyone would conduct such hunts is doubtful, making the purpose of the current scientific trips hard to understand, says Ayako Okubo, a researcher at Tokyo University.

"Truthfully, private companies would not go whaling in the Atlantic, if it weren't for the research hunts," she said.

But bureaucrats at the Fisheries Agency feel they are defending Japan's sovereign rights and food tradition, and have linked the issue with national pride. Many within Japan feel making any concessions on whaling is giving in to foreign pressure, said Jun Morikawa, a professor at Rakuno Gakuen University in northern Hokkaido.

"Nationalism is a double-edged sword. National sentiment has been activated now. But do you think the Fisheries Agency could pull out, even if it wanted to?" he said.

With whalers and conservationists unable to bridge the gap over Antarctica, it appears another IWC meeting will pass without a deal.

Explore further: Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Japan may quit whaling commission if ban stays put

Jun 15, 2010

(AP) -- Japan is considering withdrawing from the International Whaling Commission if no progress is made toward easing an international ban on commercial whaling, its fisheries minister said Tuesday.

Commission proposes limited commercial whale hunts

Apr 23, 2010

(AP) -- The International Whaling Commission has proposed allowing the animals to be hunted under strict quotas, bringing the world a step closer to the first legal commercial whaling in nearly 25 years.

Australia: Japan's whaling program a sham

Mar 28, 2006

Australian officials say a 10-year project examining whales off Australia's Antarctic territory prove Japan's whaling program has no scientific basis.

Whalers, activists clash again in Antarctic waters

Feb 18, 2010

(AP) -- A group of conservationists threw bottles of butyric acid at Japanese whalers and blasted their ship with paint balls, while the Japanese fired water cannons in their latest Antarctic Ocean clash, ...

Norway fails to fulfill whaling quota

Aug 21, 2006

Norway says its fishermen will not be able to fulfill this year's whaling quota, with about 500 minke whales caught out of the quota's 1,052.

Recommended for you

Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

8 hours ago

In an industrial area outside Kenya's capital city, workers in hard hats and white masks take shiny new power drills to computer parts. This assembly line is not assembling, though. It is dismantling some ...

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

13 hours ago

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

18 hours ago

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Royale
1.8 / 5 (4) Jun 18, 2010
Perhaps they need to be reminded of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Maybe that will slap some sense in them. I have no problem with them stopping exports to us, I can live without Japanese videogames, the seas cannot remain fertile without whales. Perhaps that's a bit extreme of an idea, but these people just don't get it. Isn't killing millions of sharks just for their fins enough for you guys? Oh and "research vessel" my ass. You've been commercially harvesting this whole time and I think the entire world should be policing you if you can't stay away from Antarctica. It's not yours guys. Back off.
TegiriNenashi
1.5 / 5 (6) Jun 18, 2010
F..k off, moron. What object hit so many people in the head, so they exaggerating the difference between pigs and whales so much?

P.S. Don't assume my nationality from my screen name.
MarkyMark
5 / 5 (2) Jun 19, 2010
The idea that they really are doing the hunting for reserch reasons would hold up more weight if they showed they were doing reserch rather than largly selling the meat on the market. Also why dont they just harvest the whales where they are available at a closer and fresher source?
moebiex
5 / 5 (1) Jun 20, 2010
What science are we talking about- I haven't seen or heard of any substantial findings or even which hypotheses they are testing- just that they are doing research. I also read (~ 2-3 years ago) that most of the meat they have collected over the course of the program remains in cold storage because no one is particularly interested in eating it. Updates on these issues would be nice.
Royale
not rated yet Jun 21, 2010
agreed. And I'm not a moron. Sure that was an obviously ridiculous situation I brought to light. But it got them to stop, didn't it? World War II would have turned out much differently without it. Gotta give them credit though, for an island nation, they sure packed a wallop. Regardless the murder of whales in an internationally protected area is breaking the law, i don't care what else you have to say about it, they're breaking the rules.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (1) Jun 21, 2010
It's very simple, whales score higher on the sensory intelligence test than some people do. Perhaps we should just eat stupid people instead.

We certainly wouldn't run out of food.
Royale
Jun 22, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.