Climate change forces major vegetation shifts

Jun 04, 2010
This map shows locations of 15 cases of observed biome shifts due to climate change. Credit: Map by Patrick Gonzalez, et al.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Vegetation around the world is on the move, and climate change is the culprit, according to a new analysis of global vegetation shifts led by a University of California, Berkeley, ecologist in collaboration with researchers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.

n a paper published today (June 4) in the journal Global Ecology and Biogeography, researchers present evidence that over the past century, vegetation has been gradually moving toward the poles and up mountain slopes, where temperatures are cooler, as well as toward the equator, where rainfall is greater.

Moreover, an estimated one-tenth to one-half of the land mass on Earth will be highly vulnerable to climate-related vegetation shifts by the end of this century, depending upon how effectively humans are able to curb greenhouse gas emissions, according to the study.

The results came from a meta-analysis of hundreds of field studies and a spatial analysis of observed 20th century climate and projected 21st century vegetation.

The meta-analysis identified field studies that examined long-term vegetation shifts in which climate, rather than impacts from local human activity such as deforestation, was the dominant influence. The researchers found 15 cases of biome shifts since the 18th century that are attributable to changes in temperature and precipitation.

"This is the first global view of observed biome shifts due to climate change," said the study's lead author Patrick Gonzalez, a visiting scholar at the Center for Forestry at UC Berkeley's College of Natural Resources. "It's not just a case of one or two plant species moving to another area. To change the biome of an ecosystem, a whole suite of plants must change."

The researchers calculated that from 1901 to 2002, mean temperatures significantly increased on 76 percent of global land, with the greatest warming in boreal, or subarctic, regions. The most substantial biome shifts occurred where temperature or precipitation changed by one-half to two standard deviations from 20th century mean values.

Some examples of biome shifts that occurred include woodlands giving way to grasslands in the African Sahel, and shrublands encroaching onto tundra in the Arctic.

"The dieback of trees and shrubs in the Sahel leaves less wood for houses and cooking, while the contraction of Arctic tundra reduces habitat for caribou and other wildlife," said Gonzalez, who has served as a lead author on reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "Globally, vegetation shifts are disrupting ecosystems, reducing habitat for endangered species and altering the forests that supply water and other services to many people."

Researchers identify areas of vulnerability to biome shifts, based upon observations of changes from the 20th century and projections of changes in the 21st century. Credit: Map by Patrick Gonzalez, et al

To identify the areas most vulnerable to future vegetation shifts, the researchers combined statistical analyses of observed climate data from the 20th century with models of vegetation change in the 21st century.

Based upon nine different combinations of IPCC scenarios and climate models, the researchers divided the world's land into five classes — from very high to very low — of vulnerability to biome shifts.

"Scientists had not quantified this risk before," said Gonzalez. "We developed a simple classification system that natural resource management agencies can use to identify regions in greatest need of attention and planning. We have worked with the U.S.D.A. Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to explore the application of our results to adaptation of natural resource management."

Gonzalez said that because of limited resources, it may be prudent to focus on protecting areas of greater resilience to ecological changes so that they can serve as refuges for plants and animals. "It is also useful to identify places of higher vulnerability, because agencies will need to consider adaptation measures for vulnerable ecosystems," he said. "Some shifts in vegetation could increase fuel for wildfires, for example, so prescribed burning may be necessary to reduce the risk of catastrophic fires."

"Approximately one billion people now live in areas that are highly to very highly vulnerable to future vegetation shifts," said Gonzalez. "Ecosystems provide important services to people, so we must reduce the emissions that cause , then adapt to major changes that might occur."

Explore further: Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Climate change and species distributions

Aug 04, 2008

Scientists have long pointed to physical changes in the Earth and its atmosphere, such as melting polar ice caps, sea level rise and violent storms, as indicators of global climate change. But changes in climate can wreak ...

A changing climate for protected areas

Apr 02, 2007

On April 6, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will release a report entitled Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability that focuses on how climate change is affecting the planet.

Massive California fires consistent with climate change

Oct 24, 2007

The catastrophic fires that are sweeping Southern California are consistent with what climate change models have been predicting for years, experts say, and they may be just a prelude to many more such events in the future ...

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

14 minutes ago

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

23 hours ago

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

New challenges for ocean acidification research

Dec 19, 2014

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bbd
2 / 5 (4) Jun 05, 2010
The "culprit"? Come on now; we all know that climate change and vegetation shifts are naturally occurring phenomena. (Unless you are of the belief that Earth was created in six days, 5000 years ago.)

There's no need to demonize climate change by referring to it as a culprit. Is winter a culprit because it (temporarily) ends plant growth? Is rain a culprit because it ruins your picnic?

People need to keep their political opinions out of scientific reports.
marjon
1.6 / 5 (7) Jun 05, 2010
People need to keep their political opinions out of scientific reports.

If the motive was science they would. The motive is more government control uber alles.
TehDog
3 / 5 (4) Jun 05, 2010
It's the rate of change that is important, not the change itself.
These links specifically address the problems facing caribou.
http://www.physor...111.html
http://www.physor...608.html
Given time, most species would be able to adapt to a changing environment, unfortunately the change is occuring too fast for some.
marjon
2.6 / 5 (5) Jun 05, 2010
the change is occuring too fast for some.

And this is something new?
omatumr
2.3 / 5 (6) Jun 05, 2010
It is indeed a sad day when researchers at the University of California, Berkeley join the army of "scientists" led by Nobel Laureates Al Gore and the head of the UN's IPCC.

Earth's climate has changed, is now changing, and will always change because Earth moves in the outer layer (heliosphere) of the Sun - a variable star.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
MadPutz
4 / 5 (4) Jun 05, 2010
Everything that humanity does is natural - including to artificially preserve some aesthetically pleasing species from extinction in the face of the natural evolution of the universe/technology/biology.
Skepticus
1 / 5 (3) Jun 05, 2010
We are the top dogs on this planet,made in God's image. we can do what we want, when we want, where we want. Any changes are none of our business, not our fault whatsoever and whenever; absolutely no intervention on our part is required.It's God's will and command. Do you heathen dare to challenge God?
Shootist
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 12, 2010
it is always interesting to note that at the beginning of the lesser Dryas cooling event the southern coast of England went from deciduous forest to tundra in about 30 years.

that is bloody climate change.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.