New way to calculate the effects of Casimir forces

May 11, 2010 by Larry Hardesty
New computational techniques developed at MIT confirmed that the complex quantum effects known as Casimir forces would cause tiny objects with the shapes shown here to repel each other rather than attract. Image courtesy of Alejandro Rodriguez

(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researchers have developed a powerful new tool for calculating the effects of Casimir forces, complicated quantum forces that affect only objects that are very, very close together, with ramifications for both basic physics and the design of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).

One of the researchers' most recent discoveries using the new tool was a way to arrange tiny objects so that the ordinarily attractive become repulsive. If engineers can design MEMS so that the Casimir forces actually prevent their moving parts from sticking together — rather than causing them to stick — it could cut down substantially on the failure rate of existing MEMS. It could also help enable new, affordable MEMS devices, like tiny medical or scientific sensors, or microfluidics devices that enable hundreds of chemical or biological experiments to be performed in parallel.

has bequeathed a very weird picture of the universe to modern physicists. One of its features is a cadre of new that are constantly flashing in and out of existence in an almost undetectably short span of time. (The , a theoretically predicted particle that the in Switzerland is trying to detect for the first time, is expected to appear for only a few sextillionths of a second.) There are so many of these transient particles in space — even in a vacuum — moving in so many different directions that the forces they exert generally balance each other out. For most purposes, the particles can be ignored. But when objects get very close together, there’s little room for particles to flash into existence between them. Consequently, there are fewer transient particles in between the objects to offset the forces exerted by the transient particles around them, and the difference in pressure ends up pushing the objects toward each other.

In the 1960s, physicists developed a that, in principle, describes the effects of Casimir forces on any number of tiny objects, with any shape. But in the vast majority of cases, that formula remained impossibly hard to solve. “People think that if you have a formula, then you can evaluate it. That’s not true at all,” says Steven Johnson, an associate professor of applied mathematics, who helped develop the new tools. “There was a formula that was written down by Einstein that describes gravity. They still don’t know what all the consequences of this formula are.” For decades, the formula for Casimir forces was in the same boat. Physicists could solve it for only a small number of cases, such as that of two parallel plates. Then, in 2006, came a breakthrough: MIT Professor of Physics Mehran Kardar demonstrated a way to solve the formula for a plate and a cylinder.

Though negligible at larger scales, Casimir forces can cause the moving parts of micromachines, like the one shown here, to stick together. Image: Sandia National Laboratories

In a paper appearing this week in Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, Johnson, physics PhD students Alexander McCauley and Alejandro Rodriguez (the paper’s lead author), and John Joannopoulos, the Francis Wright Davis Professor of Physics, describe a way to solve Casimir-force equations for any number of objects, with any conceivable shape.

The researchers’ insight is that the effects of Casimir forces on objects 100 nanometers apart can be precisely modeled using objects 100,000 times as big, 100,000 times as far apart, immersed in a fluid that conducts electricity. Instead of calculating the forces exerted by tiny particles flashing into existence around the tiny objects, the researchers calculate the strength of an electromagnetic field at various points around the much larger ones. In their paper, they prove that these computations are mathematically equivalent.

For objects with odd shapes, calculating electromagnetic-field strength in a conducting fluid is still fairly complicated. But it’s eminently feasible using off-the-shelf engineering software.

“Analytically,” says Diego Dalvit, a specialist in Casimir forces at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, “it’s almost impossible to do exact calculations of the Casimir force, unless you have some very special geometries.” With the MIT researchers’ technique, however, “in principle, you can tackle any geometry. And this is useful. Very useful.”

Since Casimir forces can cause the moving parts of MEMS to stick together, Dalvit says, “One of the holy grails in Casimir physics is to find geometries where you can get repulsion” rather than attraction. And that’s exactly what the new techniques allowed the MIT researchers to do. In a separate paper published in March, physicist Michael Levin of Harvard University’s Society of Fellows, together with the MIT researchers, described the first arrangement of materials that enable Casimir forces to cause repulsion in a vacuum.

Dalvit points out, however, that physicists using the new technique must still rely on intuition when devising systems of tiny objects with useful properties. “Once you have an intuition of what geometries will cause repulsion, then the [technique] can tell you whether there is repulsion or not,” Dalvit says. But by themselves, the tools cannot identify geometries that cause repulsion.

Explore further: Physicists design zero-friction quantum engine

More information: “Theoretical ingredients of a Casimir analog computer” Alejandro W. Rodrigueza,1, John D. Joannopoulosa, Alexander P. McCauleya, and Steven G. Johnsonb, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, week of May 10, 2010.

Related Stories

Researchers see exotic force for first time

Jan 07, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- For the first time, researchers have measured a long-theorized force that operates at distances so tiny they’re measured in billionths of a meter, which may have important applications in ...

Metamaterials could reduce friction in nanomachines

Dec 07, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Nanoscale machines expected to have wide application in industry, energy, medicine and other fields may someday operate far more efficiently thanks to important theoretical discoveries concerning the manipulation ...

What do Racquel Welch and quantum physics have in common?

Jun 30, 2006

The University of Leicester is leading a three-nation consortium in a ‘fantastic voyage’ to explore empty space - with potential benefits that have only been explored in the realms of science fiction. The study aims to ...

Recommended for you

Physicists design zero-friction quantum engine

Sep 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —In real physical processes, some energy is always lost any time work is produced. The lost energy almost always occurs due to friction, especially in processes that involve mechanical motion. ...

Fluid mechanics suggests alternative to quantum orthodoxy

Sep 12, 2014

The central mystery of quantum mechanics is that small chunks of matter sometimes seem to behave like particles, sometimes like waves. For most of the past century, the prevailing explanation of this conundrum ...

The sound of an atom has been captured

Sep 11, 2014

Researchers at Chalmers University of Technology are first to show the use of sound to communicate with an artificial atom. They can thereby demonstrate phenomena from quantum physics with sound taking on ...

The quantum revolution is a step closer

Sep 11, 2014

A new way to run a quantum algorithm using much simpler methods than previously thought has been discovered by a team of researchers at the University of Bristol. These findings could dramatically bring ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ralph_wiggum
5 / 5 (4) May 11, 2010
Very promising breakthrough and a clear, informative article about it. It's always cool seeing various disciplines reducing a set of "impossible" problems in their domain to another set of manageable ones.
Alizee
May 11, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Alizee
May 11, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
thales
not rated yet May 11, 2010
Maybe this sounds wide-eyed and ignorant, but could this mean negative energy? That would be so frickin amazing.
maxcypher
5 / 5 (3) May 11, 2010
Alizee:
I followed your link to read the abstract and intro. The "infeasible experiments" you cite are a consequence of expressing Casimir forces in terms of the frequency integrals of classical Green's functions. In fact, the methods described in this research are able to circumvent the experimental problems. The work deserves a closer read than you gave.
MaxwellsDemon
not rated yet May 12, 2010
What an astoundingly elegant breakthrough. I can't begin to imagine the enormous avalanche of advancements that this single simple insight will yield in the years ahead 0.o

Maybe this sounds wide-eyed and ignorant, but could this mean negative energy? That would be so frickin amazing.


The attractive Casimir effect has been cited as one practical form of negative energy for many years now, since closely-spaced parallel plates suppress the virtual particle fluctuations below the ordinary 'zero line' of vacuum energy. This has been of great interest to theorists working on wormhole and spacetime propulsion physics concepts, where negative energy may be a useful workaround for the apparently imaginary 'exotic matter' (which is defined as matter with negative energy density):

http://prl.aps.or.../p1446_1
ZeroX
3 / 5 (2) May 12, 2010
The "infeasible experiments" you cite are a consequence of expressing Casimir forces in terms of the frequency integrals of classical Green's functions. In fact, the methods described in this research are able to circumvent the experimental problems.
I'm citing the abstract only. If you don't agree with the meaning of article's abstract, you should dispute it with authors, don't you think?

I'm just pointing out the trollism of readers, who are claiming withour reading of source, this method is perfect - whereas authors itself are saying, it isn't. This has nothing to do with quality of this article, even negative results are important ones - especially in the context of this article

http://arstechnic...ence.ars

This example just illustrates, people are creatures who tend to see a success even at the place, where it isn't and journalists are just supporting them in it - they're just giving them, what people want.
Husky
not rated yet May 12, 2010
geometrically it looks like squeezing out a hotdog in a dare i say peristaltic motion? but seriously how about extending the hole into a tokamak shaped tunnel and cut the hotdog, in halve, so it becomes asymmetrical, than the zero point energy will keep squeezing the hotdog in one direction. naturally as a consequence the universe will stop expanding to make up for the perceived loss of ZPE....
ZeroX
2.3 / 5 (6) May 12, 2010
This example is just trying to demonstrate, Casimir force (which is normally attractive) becomes repulsive force at the case of concave shapes, like gravity.

It's not so strange, because mechanisms of Casimir force and gravity are basically the same in dense aether theory - they just differ by number of extradimensions, in which they're working. There exists a theory, which explains cold fusion phenomena and fractional quantum states by negative Casimir force inside of holes of porous materials (Raney nickel or palladium).
thales
not rated yet May 12, 2010
mechanisms of Casimir force and gravity are basically the same in dense aether theory


I think pretty much everything's the same in dense aether theory.
Alizee
May 12, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.