Bubble of methane triggered rig blast

May 08, 2010 By NOAKI SCHWARTZ and HARRY R. WEBER , Associated Press Writers
The containment vessel is lowered into the Gulf of Mexico at the site of the Deepwater Horizon rig collapse, Thursday, May 6, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation.

While the cause of the explosion is still under investigation, the sequence of events described in the interviews provides the most detailed account of the April 20 blast that killed 11 workers and touched off the underwater gusher that has poured more than 3 million gallons of crude into the Gulf.

Portions of the interviews, two written and one taped, were described in detail to an Associated Press reporter by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He received them from industry friends seeking his expert opinion.

A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts. Meanwhile, far below, the rig was being converted from an exploration well to a production well.

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the . A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.

Deep beneath the seafloor, methane is in a slushy, crystalline form. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

As the bubble rose up the drill column from the high-pressure environs of the deep to the less pressurized shallows, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, Bea said.

"A small bubble becomes a really big bubble," Bea said. "So the expanding bubble becomes like a cannon shooting the gas into your face."

Up on the rig, the first thing workers noticed was the sea water in the drill column suddenly shooting back at them, rocketing 240 feet in the air, he said. Then, gas surfaced. Then oil.

"What we had learned when I worked as a drill rig laborer was swoosh, boom, run," Bea said. "The swoosh is the gas, boom is the explosion and run is what you better be doing."

The gas flooded into an adjoining room with exposed ignition sources, he said.

"That's where the first explosion happened," said Bea, who worked for Shell Oil in the 1960s during the last big northern oil well blowout. "The mud room was next to the quarters where the party was. Then there was a series of explosions that subsequently ignited the oil that was coming from below."

According to one interview transcript, a gas cloud covered the rig, causing giant engines on the drill floor to run too fast and explode. The engines blew off the rig and set "everything on fire," the account said. Another explosion below blew more equipment overboard.

BP spokesman John Curry would not comment Friday night on whether or the series of events described in the internal documents caused the accident.

"Clearly, what happened on the Deepwater Horizon was a tragic accident," said Curry, who is based at an oil spill command center in Robert, La. "We anticipate all the facts will come out in a full investigation."

The BP executives were injured but survived, according to one account. Nine rig crew on the rig floor and two engineers died.

"The furniture and walls trapped some and broke some bones but they managed to get in the life boats with assistance from others," said the transcript.

The reports made Bea, the 73-year-old industry veteran, cry.

"It sure as hell is painful," he said. "Tears of frustration and anger."

On Friday, a BP-chartered vessel lowered a 100-ton concrete-and-steel vault onto the ruptured well, an important step in a delicate and unprecedented attempt to stop most of the gushing crude fouling the sea.

"We are essentially taking a four-story building and lowering it 5,000 feet and setting it on the head of a pin," BP spokesman Bill Salvin told The Associated Press.

Underwater robots guided the 40-foot-tall box into place in a slow-moving drama. Now that the contraption is on the seafloor, workers will need at least 12 hours to let it settle and make sure it's stable before the robots can hook up a pipe and hose that will funnel the oil up to a tanker.

"It appears to be going exactly as we hoped," Salvin said on Friday afternoon, shortly after the four-story device hit the seafloor. "Still lots of challenges ahead, but this is very good progress."

By Sunday, the box the size of a house could be capturing up to 85 percent of the oil.

The task became increasingly urgent as toxic oil crept deeper into the bays and marshes of the Mississippi Delta.

A sheen of oil began arriving on land last week, and crews have been laying booms, spraying chemical dispersants and setting fire to the slick to try to keep it from coming ashore. But now the thicker, stickier goo - arrayed in vivid, brick-colored ribbons - is drawing ever closer to Louisiana's coastal communities.

There are still untold risks and unknowns with the containment box: The approach has never been tried at such depths, where the water pressure is enough to crush a submarine, and any wrong move could damage the leaking pipe and make the problem worse. The seafloor is pitch black and the water murky, though lights on the robots illuminate the area where they are working.

If the box works, another one will be dropped onto a second, smaller leak at the bottom of the Gulf.

At the same time, crews are drilling sideways into the well in hopes of plugging it up with mud and concrete, and they are working on other ways to cap it.

Investigators looking into the cause of the explosion have been focusing on the so-called blowout preventer. Federal regulators told The Associated Press Friday that they are going to examine whether these last-resort cutoff valves on offshore oil wells are reliable.

Blowouts are infrequent, because well holes are blocked by piping and pumped-in materials like synthetic mud, cement and even sea water. The pipes are plugged with cement, so fluid and gas can't typically push up inside the pipes.

Instead, a typical blowout surges up a channel around the piping. The narrow space between the well walls and the piping is usually filled with cement, so there is no pathway for a blowout. But if the cement or broken piping leaves enough space, a surge can rise to the surface.

There, at the wellhead of exploratory wells, sits the massive steel contraption known as a blowout preventer. It can snuff a blowout by squeezing rubber seals tightly around the pipes with up to 1 million pounds of force. If the seals fail, the blowout preventer deploys a last line of defense: a set of rams that can slice right through the pipes and cap the blowout.

Deepwater Horizon was also equipped with an automated backup system called a Deadman. It should have activated the blowout preventer even if workers could not.

Based on the interviews with rig workers, none of those safeguards worked.

Explore further: New research explains wintertime ozone pollution in Utah oil and gas fields

4.1 /5 (9 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Giant box close to being over oil-spewing well

May 07, 2010

(AP) -- A mission to the bottom of the sea to try to avert a wider environmental disaster progressed early Friday as crews said a 100-ton concrete-and-steel box was close to being placed over a blown-out ...

BP struggles to cap leak as US oil slick spreads

Apr 26, 2010

British oil giant BP used robotic underwater vehicles Monday to try to cap a leaking well and prevent a growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from developing into an environmental disaster.

'Major oil spill' as rig sinks off US coast

Apr 23, 2010

A blazing oil rig has sunk into the Gulf of Mexico, sparking fears of an environmental disaster two days after a massive blast that left 11 workers missing.

BP to use domes to capture giant oil spill

May 04, 2010

Winds pushed a giant slick towards fragile wetlands on the United States coast Tuesday as efforts intensified to bottle up a ruptured oil well causing the growing environmental disaster.

Mad scramble as oil slick nears Louisiana coast

Apr 29, 2010

Offshore winds pushed a giant oil slick closer to the Louisiana coast Thursday amid a frenzied effort by authorities to contain what one official said had become a disaster of "national significance."

Recommended for you

Report IDs 'major weaknesses' at nuclear-arms lab

13 hours ago

One of the nation's premier nuclear weapons laboratories is being called out by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy for "major weaknesses" in the way it packaged contaminated waste before shipping it to ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
1 / 5 (3) May 08, 2010

There is talk of the well having been drilled deeper than the 18,000 feet that BP claims, which would lead to greater head pressure than expected for the puposes of the cementing operations. Details and more:

http://www.altern...y?page=2
jonnyboy
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2010
Yep, Caliban, I would have to agree with you that BP intentionally caused this problem so that they could get rid of an excess billion (or 4) dollars that they just had laying around.
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2010
Yep, Caliban, I would have to agree with you that BP intentionally caused this problem so that they could get rid of an excess billion (or 4) dollars that they just had laying around.


I am by no means saying that this was done purposefully- what I am saying is that it could have been avoided. Profit seeking and cost-cutting usually involves cutting corners, as well.
HerbM
5 / 5 (2) May 09, 2010
As a former directional drilling superintendent and having worked with and among downhole surveyers, I can promise you that they know EXACTLY how deep this well was drilled (within just a few feet) and exactly where it ended (horizontal displacement).

They would NOT make a mistake on this, and there would be no way to lie about it -- too many independent people double check and certify these measurements.

What MIGHT be the case (but doesn't appear to have been a big part of this one) is that they could have reach a formation earlier (or later) than expected, and so not being physically deeper, they might have been deeper into a particular geological formation.

But by the time they were involved in completion/abandonment cementing procedures, all of these discrepancies would also be accounted.

The best explanation I have heard is that the cement plug failed, probably due to the heat of setting, it was infiltrated with gas (or liquids) that ruined the integrity of that plug.
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) May 09, 2010

So then, maybe it is past time to employ containment measures -as a matter of course- aka SOP, at the time and place, as opposed to just expecting the cementing procedure to go without a hitch. As has been pointed out elsewhere on this forum(by me), Halliburton(in particular) has a better than 50% failure rate for their cementing operations in the recent past.

Go Figure.

miamiandy
not rated yet May 09, 2010
I'm a novice at this, but from my view, it seems very suspicious that this would happen just a few weeks after President Obama gave his energy speech. A speech that encouraged off shore drilling. Who's to benefit? I've seen enough James Bond 007 movies to guess, but I'm sure there's a way to sabotage the rig.
croghan27
not rated yet May 09, 2010
Thank you HerbM for sharing your experience. I have worked (not in wells, but in refineries) with C2s and know they are sneaky little compounds that can work their way in all manner of unexpected places. I also have seen crystles form when they are released from some pressure (that is what makes refridgerators work)- some warming tactic should have been tried.

It is my undertanding that the BOP will not work at the junction of two lengths of piping - is this a possibility for what happened?