Study: US needs better-trained math teachers to compete globally

Apr 15, 2010

Math teachers in the United States need better training if the nation's K-12 students are going to compete globally, according to international research released today by a Michigan State University scholar.

William Schmidt, University Distinguished Professor of education, found that prospective U.S. elementary and middle-school math teachers are not as prepared as those from other countries. And this, combined with a weak U.S. math curriculum, produces similarly weak student achievement, he said.

The Education Study in , or TEDS-M, is by far the largest of its kind, surveying more than 3,300 future teachers in the United States and 23,244 future teachers across 16 countries. Schmidt led the U.S. portion of the project.

"We must break the cycle in which we find ourselves," said Schmidt, who presented his findings at a Washington news conference.

"A weak K-12 in the U.S., taught by teachers with an inadequate mathematics background, produces high school graduates who are at a disadvantage. When some of these students become future teachers and are not given a strong background in mathematics during teacher preparation, the cycle continues."

More rigorous K-12 math standards, which are part of the Common Core State Standards Initiative, will be completed soon by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State Officers. The standards are expected to be adopted by a majority of the 48 states considering them.

But the new standards will require U.S. math teachers to be even more knowledgeable, Schmidt said. His study found that while nearly all future middle-school teachers in the top-achieving countries took courses in linear algebra and basic calculus, only about half of U.S. future teachers took the fundamental courses.

To attack the problem, Schmidt laid out a three-fold approach:

  • Recruit teachers with stronger math backgrounds.
  • Implement more rigorous state certification requirements for math teachers.
  • Require more demanding math courses in all teacher preparation programs.
Schmidt, who studied the performance of 81 public and private colleges and universities, said the real issue is how teachers are prepared - the courses they take and the experiences they have. The quality and type of programs in the varies widely by state and by institution.

TEDS-M revealed that differences in middle school teacher certification programs, for example, have a great impact on math-teaching capabilities. Future teachers prepared in programs focused on secondary schools (grades 6 and above) had significantly higher mathematics knowledge scores than those prepared in other types of programs, including those focused only on middle school teacher preparation.

"Teacher preparation curricula are critical, not only for our future teachers, but also for the children they will be teaching," Schmidt said. "The problem isn't simply the amount of formal math education our future teachers receive. It also involves studying the theoretical and practical aspects both of teaching mathematics and teaching in general."

Explore further: Study shows readers absorb less information when reading on a Kindle

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Closing the Achievement Gap in Math and Science

May 02, 2008

The latest results from the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Math and Science Partnership (MSP) program show not only improved proficiency among all elementary and middle school students, but also a closing ...

Enhanced math instruction proposed

Oct 19, 2006

Researchers say U.S. high school pupils taking vocational classes with enhanced math instruction do better on standardized math tests than other students.

Recommended for you

Feeling bad at work can be a good thing

Aug 21, 2014

(Phys.org) —Research by the University of Liverpool suggests that, contrary to popular opinion, it can be good to feel bad at work, whilst feeling good in the workplace can also lead to negative outcomes.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PinkElephant
5 / 5 (1) Apr 15, 2010
For more info:

http://www.corestandards.org/

I find it curious (and telling) that the only two states not participating, are Alaska and Texas.
marjon
1 / 5 (1) Apr 15, 2010
What is really needed is an end to the government/union public school system. Many talented math professionals are not teaching because schools are run by liberal unions that demand at least a year of BS classes to teach.
Break the teachers unions and you may attract quality teachers.
Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (1) Apr 16, 2010
So, today's inadequately trained instructors are going to train tomorrow's better trained math teachers?

Until self-esteem is earned and not injected, there will be no improvement.

Read Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt's 'The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America' online as a searchable PDF of 6.75 MB ~700+ pages
marjon
not rated yet Apr 17, 2010
"For last year's Earth Day, for example, sixth-grade students at a tony private school near San Francisco were given this bizarre assignment: Make a list of ways Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates' fortune could be spent on environmentally friendly projects. There was no hint that systematic market-based incentives for people and businesses could protect the environment--merely that it is OK to appropriate wealth from someone as long as it's for a good cause."
http://www.forbes...r_2.html
Yes, the USA needs better science and math educators.