Radar Finds Ice Deposits at Moon's North Pole

Mar 02, 2010
Craters at the north pole of the Moon. Red -Fresh Craters. Green -Anomalous Craters.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using data from a NASA radar that flew aboard India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft, scientists have detected ice deposits near the moon's north pole. NASA's Mini-SAR instrument, a lightweight, synthetic aperture radar, found more than 40 small craters with water ice. The craters range in size from 1 to 9 miles (2 to15 km) in diameter. Although the total amount of ice depends on its thickness in each crater, it's estimated there could be at least 600 million metric tons of water ice.

The Mini-SAR has imaged many of the permanently shadowed regions that exist at both poles of the Moons. These dark areas are extremely cold and it has been hypothesized that volatile material, including water ice, could be present in quantity here. The main science object of the Mini-SAR experiment is to map and characterize any deposits that exist.

Mini-SAR is a lightweight (less than 10 kg) imaging radar. It uses the polarization properties of reflected radio waves to characterize surface properties. Mini-SAR sends pulses of radar that are left-circular polarized. Typical planetary surfaces reverse the polarization during the reflection of , so that normal echoes from Mini-SAR are right circular polarized. The ratio of received power in the same sense transmitted (left circular) to the opposite sense (right circular) is called the circular polarization ratio (CPR). Most of the has low CPR, meaning that the reversal of polarization is the norm, but some targets have high CPR. These include very rough, fresh surfaces (such as a young, fresh crater) and ice, which is transparent to radio energy and multiply scatters the pulses, leading to an enhancement in same sense reflections and hence, high CPR. CPR is not uniquely diagnostic of either roughness or ice; the science team must take into account the environment of the occurrences of high CPR signal to interpret its cause.

Numerous craters near the poles of the Moon have interiors that are in permanent sun shadow. These areas are very cold and water ice is stable there essentially indefinitely. Fresh craters show high degrees of surface roughness (high CPR) both inside and outside the crater rim, caused by sharp rocks and block fields that are distributed over the entire crater area. However, Mini-SAR has found craters near the north pole that have high CPR inside, but not outside their rims. This relation suggests that the high CPR is not caused by roughness, but by some material that is restricted within the interiors of these craters. We interpret this relation as consistent with water ice present in these craters. The ice must be relatively pure and at least a couple of meters thick to give this signature.

The estimated amount of water ice potentially present is comparable to the quantity estimated solely from the previous mission of Lunar Prospector’s neutron data (several hundred million metric tons.) The variation in the estimates between Mini-SAR and the Lunar Prospector’s neutron spectrometer is due to the fact that it only measures to depths of about one-half meter, so it would underestimate the total quantity of water ice present. At least some of the polar ice is mixed with lunar soil and thus, invisible to our radar.

"The emerging picture from the multiple measurements and resulting data of the instruments on lunar missions indicates that water creation, migration, deposition and retention are occurring on the moon," said Paul Spudis, principal investigator of the Mini-SAR experiment at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston. "The new discoveries show the moon is an even more interesting and attractive scientific, exploration and operational destination than people had previously thought."

"After analyzing the data, our science team determined a strong indication of , a finding which will give future missions a new target to further explore and exploit," said Jason Crusan, program executive for the Mini-RF Program for NASA's Space Operations Mission Directorate in Washington.

The Mini-SAR's findings are being published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The results are consistent with recent findings of other instruments and add to the growing scientific understanding of the multiple forms of water found on the moon. The agency's Moon Mineralogy Mapper discovered water molecules in the moon's polar regions, while water vapor was detected by NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS.

Mini-SAR and Moon Mineralogy Mapper are two of 11 instruments on the Indian Space Research Organization's Chandrayaan-1. The Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md., performed the final integration and testing on Mini-SAR. It was developed and built by the Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake, Calif., and several other commercial and government contributors.

Explore further: SpaceX breaks ground on Texas rocket launch site

Related Stories

Crafty Tricks for Finding Moon Water

Mar 28, 2008

Bright gray, crater-pocked mountains taller than Mount McKinley. Abyssal craters that could swallow several Grand Canyons whole.

New lunar south polar maps from SMART-1

Mar 11, 2008

Newly-released images of the lunar south-polar region obtained by ESA’s SMART-1 are proving to be wonderful tools to zero-in on suitable study sites for potential future lunar exploration missions.

Recommended for you

Getting to the root of the problem in space

4 hours ago

When we go to Mars, will astronauts be able to grow enough food there to maintain a healthy diet? Will they be able to produce food in NASA's Orion spacecraft on the year-long trip to Mars? How about growing ...

The difference between CMEs and solar flares

6 hours ago

This is a question we are often asked: what is the difference between a coronal mass ejection (CME) and a solar flare? We discussed it in a recent astrophoto post, but today NASA put out a video with amazing graphics that explain ...

Scientific instruments of Rosetta's Philae lander

6 hours ago

When traveling to far off lands, one packs carefully. What you carry must be comprehensive but not so much that it is a burden. And once you arrive, you must be prepared to do something extraordinary to make ...

How ancient impacts made mining practical

8 hours ago

About 1.85 billion years ago, in what would come to be known as Sudbury Canada, a 10 kilometer wide asteroid struck with such energy that it created an impact crater 250 kilometers wide. Today the chief industry of Sudbury ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.8 / 5 (8) Mar 02, 2010
All of the lunar landing activity in the last 50 years are in danger of melting the lunar ice-caps causing huge lowland flooding and increased funding next year for lunar climate scientists :)
1 / 5 (4) Mar 02, 2010
So while NASA/India were collecting this data on water at the moon's N-pole what did they find on the south pole, since the satellite had to pass over that area too?
And the biggest question has to be why the LCROSS mission, several months ago while Chandrayaan was collecting this data, to crash into the south pole in order to reveal a plume of water??? The impactor essentially vanished, with hardly a plume, as if it entered a series of sub-surface chambers.

Was the LCROSS hype a message or just more smoke and mirrors???
4 / 5 (4) Mar 02, 2010
Another reason to support private enterprise in space. Imagine how much this water would be worth delivered to the ISS or other space habitats (Bigelow Hotels for instance) instead of having to be lifted from the Earth. Stop waiting for NASA to "lead" the way. They have had plans to mine and refine the Moon and asteroids on the books for at least 20 years and neither NASA nor Congress have the willpower to proceed. Get out of the way!
not rated yet Mar 02, 2010
Peter Diamandis says it far better than I. See this report from the Wall St Journal (not a favorite paper of mine, but somewhat respectable, none the less)
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 02, 2010
The impactor essentially vanished, with hardly a plume, as if it entered a series of sub-surface chambers.

Sub-surface chambers? Don't be silly. It's obvious that it must have fallen into a pile of feathery-soft pillows.
4 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2010
If my math is correct, about 9 cubic miles. Why of why must the scientists put data in terms that the layman has trouble visualizing?
Thank the gods for Google!
4 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2010
about 9 cubic miles. Why of why must the scientists put data in terms that the layman has trouble visualizing?
Because only a certain subset of all laymen on the local planet is used to visualize (cubic) "miles"? And because there are a lot of different "miles" in use?