ET: Check your voicemail

Nov 24, 2009 by David L. Chandler
Joe Davis ascends a walkway to the transmission dome suspended 500 feet above the Arecibo radiotelescope dish in Puerto Rico, in preparation for his transmission of a message to alien beings. Photo: Ashley Clark

( -- Alien beings on faraway planets may not have noticed, but it’s been 35 years since human beings made the first deliberate effort to send them a message.

In 1974, astronomers Carl Sagan and Frank Drake, both working at Cornell University, used the world’s biggest and most powerful radio telescope to transmit a one-of-a-kind three-minute message. It consisted of 1,679 bits — ones and zeroes — and was cleverly designed to produce a simple image revealing something about humans’ size and shape, our solar system, the dish that sent the message, and even the biochemistry of our bodies.

Joe Davis, a research affiliate in MIT’s biology department and a former artist-in-residence at MIT's Center for Advanced Visual Studies, decided that the Earth’s first broadcast to aliens was an event worth commemorating, and set out to find an appropriate way of marking the occasion.

Earlier this month, a few days before the message’s Nov. 16 anniversary, he beamed a new message from the same telescope, the Arecibo dish in Puerto Rico — using his iPhone as an improvised source to get the new coded message modulated into the 1,000-foot-wide dish’s two-million-watt radio beam.

The iPhone wasn’t part of the original plan, but when Davis arrived at the radio telescope site, the director there told him that the encoder normally used to modulate the powerful beam was out of commission. He suggested that Davis postpone the transmission. Fearing that he might not get another chance, Davis and a friend worked through the night to create an alternative method. They came up with a workaround using the iPhone’s audio-recording capability and some scrounged connector cables.

Afterward, Ann Druyan, Sagan’s widow, read about Davis’ transmission and sent him a note thanking him for commemorating the 1974 message, “and especially for doing it with such flair.” She added, “I know Carl would have loved the story. (As did I.)”

For the message, Davis chose to represent RuBisCO (short for ribulose- 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase), which may be the most common protein molecule in all of Earth’s myriad life forms. Not only is RuBisCO a ubiquitous biomolecule, Davis explains, it’s also a key to living beings’ very survival, since it’s a basis for photosynthesis, the energy source for nearly all terrestrial life forms.

The targets were carefully chosen, too — three nearby stars, ranging from 12 to 30 light years away, that are similar to our sun. So, since radio waves travel at the speed of light, it wil take 12 to 30 years for the message to reach its destinations. In contrast to the target of the Sagan-Drake transmission — a star cluster 25,000 light years away that will have moved far from its original location by the time the beam gets there, and therefore will never get the message — these stars will still be there when the radio waves arrive.

Davis calls the project “Rubisco Stars.” His detailed report of the process of getting his message beamed out to the three nearby stars has already been posted on several science blogs (including Centauri Dreams).

The message, like its predecessor 35 years ago, is really aimed more at earthlings than at aliens, whose chances of receiving the message, let alone interpreting it, are vanishingly small. The real idea is to get people thinking about what it would mean to converse with beings whose nature and environment are far beyond our imagination. As Davis points out, “there are intelligent beings on Earth we can’t communicate with.”

In that sense, this is, like most of Davis’ work, a blend of science and art. For a project in the 1980s, for example, he arranged with NASA to create an artistic piece from the space shuttle’s payload bay. The project would have used a high-powered electron gun to produce an artificial aurora, but it was one of many payloads canceled after the Challenger disaster in 1986.

In recent years, Davis has worked with the tools of genetic engineering to embed tiny artworks inside the genomes of microbes — creating sequences of DNA bases that can, with an appropriate translation scheme, be decoded into a series of binary numbers that, arranged in a grid, form simple line drawings. He has also produced “DNA prayer flags,” colorful Tibetan-style patchwork designs decorated with the genetic codes (in standard ACGT notation) of known disease markers on the human genome. The flags have been displayed by people all over the globe (at least three Nobel laureates among them), and are, Davis says, “kind of a cool connection between religion and molecular genetics that nobody can really argue with.”

The prayer flags are not Davis’ only attempt to meld science, art and religion. In the biology labs of MIT professor emeritus Alexander Rich, where Davis often works on his projects, there are jars containing the parts of disassembled clocks, immersed in water. Davis says, wryly, that if the molecules that form the basis of life could have spontaneously self-assembled in Earth’s primordial seas, as most biologists believe, why couldn’t a clock — a much simpler system — also spontaneously assemble itself? The jars have been sitting there for a few years. So far, Davis says, he’s seen no signs of self-assembly.

Davis moved from the Center for Advanced Visual Studies to the biology department in 1986. He had been discussing some of his ideas for microbial art with Rich when, as Davis describes it, Rich asked him, “What are they paying you over there?” “Nothing,” Davis replied. Rich immediately said, “I’ll match it!” Davis has been working in the biology department ever since.

While much of his work is microscopic, transient or inscrutable, perhaps his most visible creation was a large stainless-steel globe surrounded by steam jets. This work is located prominently in Kendall Square in Cambridge, Mass., next to the MIT campus.

But the microbial artworks — though they’re invisible to the eye, and though their jars have only once been publicly displayed outside Rich’s lab in building 68 — are self-reproducing. And therefore, Davis explains with a grin, they’ve become the most-reproduced artworks in the world, with billions of copies.

"I'm probably the most successful publisher in history," Davis told a writer for Scientific American a few years ago, referring to his exponentially reproducing microbial art. And now, with Rubisco Stars, he may also be responsible for the most widely disseminated artwork ever produced on Earth — even if nobody ever sees it.

Besides, he adds, he now owns what he calls the world’s coolest phone. “Who knows who’s going to be calling back?”

Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news : web)

Explore further: Bacteria manipulate salt to build shelters to hibernate

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hello, Hello, Earth?

Dec 05, 2004

If ET ever phones home, chances are Earthlings wouldn't recognize the call as anything other than random noise or a star. New research shows that highly efficient electromagnetic transmissions from our neighbors in space wou ...

Voyager at 30: Looking Beyond and Within

Sep 05, 2007

A mission that was supposed to last just five years is celebrating its 30th anniversary this fall. Scientists continue to receive data from the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft as they approach interstellar space.

Nanomaterials to Mimic Cells

Aug 23, 2005

Mimicking a real living cell by combining artificial membranes and nanomaterials in one construction is the aim of a new research grant at UC Davis. The Nanoscale Integrated Research Team grant, funded by the National Science ...

Shining a Brighter Light

Jun 14, 2005

New lighting technology developed at UC Davis offers quality, cost and environmental benefits compared with existing types of lighting, according to Charles E. Hunt, professor of electrical and computer engineering. Field emi ...

Recommended for you

Bacteria manipulate salt to build shelters to hibernate

1 hour ago

For the first time, Spanish researchers have detected an unknown interaction between microorganisms and salt. When Escherichia coli cells are introduced into a droplet of salt water and is left to dry, b ...

How do we terraform Venus?

1 hour ago

It might be possible to terraform Venus some day, when our technology gets good enough. The challenges for Venus are totally different than for Mars. How will we need to fix Venus?

Biomarkers of the deep

3 hours ago

Tucked away in the southwest corner of Spain is a unique geological site that has fascinated astrobiologists for decades. The Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) in Spain's Río Tinto area is the largest known deposit ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) Nov 24, 2009
"Davis says, wryly, that if the molecules that form the basis of life could have spontaneously self-assembled in Earth’s primordial seas, as most biologists believe, why couldn’t a clock — a much simpler system — also spontaneously assemble itself?"

A clock is a simpler mechanism? All its parts have to be machined, none are naturally created, nor is there any natural process by which those parts can even conceivably be created. Maybe the physical principles that govern a clock's operation are easier for us humans to understand, but the actual creation of a working clock requires elements that are far from simple.
not rated yet Nov 24, 2009
Very true, Thrasymachus, a clock is a mission-specific arrangement of specialized parts, all with the express purpose of telling time. Biological elementary units did not have any kind of mission guiding their evolution; they simply developed in response to the pressures of environment, threats, food gathering and reproduction, period. Hence, at the beginning of evolution, no one could have predicted what kinds of creatures would eventually result. That is very different from a clock, which is pre-planned, pre-machined and then purposely assembled, not in response to any environment, but to a blueprint.
5 / 5 (1) Nov 24, 2009
By the way, don't bother to try to explain it to someone like Davis. It's the same as trying to explain an eight-cylinder engine to a three year-old. First, Davis has an emotional need to disbelieve any sort of rational explanation. Where that need comes from is any psychiatrist's guess. But also, it may simply be that he cannot grasp the logic of scientific inquiry. That problem may actually be genetic, as some clinical studies have shown. Best just to continue exploring and discovering the beauty and complexity of the Universe, and let the slow-pokes get left back in class. It's beyond our control.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 24, 2009
They MAY have received it and answered (some time ago):

For me, a very intriguing point is the replacement of phosphate by silicate in "their" DNA in the "returned" message. It's a stretch to believe that human crop circle makers would be that sophisticated - but if university types made the circle, well all bets are off.
5 / 5 (1) Nov 25, 2009
Crop circles? Really? Why should the encoded message be in English? Aren't there more Chinese speakers in the world? And why some vague platitudes about deception and broken promises? If they're warning us about something, why not be specific? If they can come here and leave semi-inspirational messages encoded in our wheat, why not show themselves publicly, and meet with people directly?
not rated yet Dec 03, 2009
Did Thrasymachus and Truth comprehend the article? The jars already contained the machined parts from previously dissassembled clocks. The gears, springs, screws, etc. are meant to be analogous to atoms and bonds. In this respect the simpler system may be the clock.

There is still no scientific proof that human beings were not genetically engineered for a specific purpose by another species capable of rational thought. The likelihood of the environmental conditions being so perfect as to produce a life form with all of the attributes that make us conscious, autonomous, emotional, intelligent, artistic beings are astronomically small. How is it that we can build an atomic computer clock but we still don't even have the knowledge to comprehend how our own bodies work? Yet we're to believe that somehow evolution (i.e. pure chance coupled with entropy, a remarkably nonconstructive scenario) figured it out just fine.

I think I'll trust the clock to build itself first.
not rated yet Dec 07, 2009
There is still no scientific proof that leprechauns don't exist. How is it that my socks always disappear in the washing machine? The likelihood of my socks disappearing and thus violating the conservation of energy and mass is astronomically small. How is it that we can find oil and minerals thousands of km under the earth, yet we still can't find our socks?

I think I'll trust the leprechauns to steal my socks.