Choosing a Low Radiation Cell Phone

Sep 10, 2009 by Lin Edwards weblog
Mobile phones on display (A)

(PhysOrg.com) -- An Environmental Working Group (EWG) team has released a consumer guide on the radiation levels emitted by over 1,000 cell phones sold in the U.S. The guide is the most comprehensive ever published, and is available online.

The guide is based on details of emission levels supplied by cell phone manufacturers, and enables consumers to make an informed decision about which phone to buy. The EWG believes a comprehensive guide of this nature was needed because U.S. laws do not require cell phone manufacturers to include radiation information on their printed materials and advertising, making comparisons extremely difficult.

Senior Scientist Olga Naidenko PhD, the leading author of the guide, said that while the research results are not yet conclusive there are concerns about the risk of cancer through exposure to radiation emitted by cell phones, PDAs and Smartphones, especially as recent studies have shown an increase in salivary gland and brain tumors in people using cell phones for 10 or more years. Research is continuing, and much more is needed, but it makes sense to reduce exposure in the meantime.

Cell phone radiation may be more dangerous for children than adults because their skulls are thinner and softer and less able to act as a shield protecting the brain from radiation. Studies have shown their brains absorb double the radiation absorbed by adult brains.

The wireless industry group CTIA disputes the need for the report, saying the scientific evidence indicates that cell phones and other wireless devices are not a public health risk. They also point out that organizations such as the , the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the American Cancer Society have all concluded that cell phones do not pose a risk to public health.

Governments in the UK, France, Germany, Finland, Switzerland and Israel disagree, since they have cautioned against excessive cell phone use, especially by children, and have recommended their use be restricted. In the U.S. cell phone standards are set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), but these standards are based on outdated (1992) recommendations that allow the levels of radiation entering the head to be 20 times greater than the trunk and limbs.

The EWG has urged the FCC to raise standards to accommodate the results of recent research, and the increasing numbers of children using the phones. As many as 71% of children aged 12 to 17 own cell phones, with more than 50% of them using their phone every day, according to the Pew Internet and American Life Project of 2008.

The EWG consumer guide tools are free (although they would appreciate a donation), and you can use the website to check out the radiation level of your own phone (even if it's an old model) or any phone you are considering buying. The search engine enables you to quickly compare every model made by a manufacturer or supplied by a provider, or compare every phone on the market.

The EWG guide lists the 10 lowest emitting phones and the 10 highest emitting phones. It also offers tips on reducing exposure to radiation from your phone, including using a landline in preference, texting instead of talking, and using headsets or speakerphones. They also advise avoiding using the phone when the signal is weak because levels are raised when the phone tries to make a weak connection.

10 Best Phones

Listing is based on phones currently available from major carriers.
You can also see all available phones ranked by radiation.

1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) [AT&T]
2. Motorola RAZR V8 [CellularONE]
3. Samsung SGH-t229 [T-Mobile]
4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) [AT&T]
5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) [AT&T]
6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) [CellularONE, T-Mobile]
7. T-Mobile Sidekick [T-Mobile]
8. LG Xenon (GR500) [AT&T]
9. Motorola Karma QA1 [AT&T]
10. Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]

10 Phones That Emit the Most Radiation

1. Motorola MOTO VU204 [Verizon Wireless]
2. T-Mobile myTouch 3G [T-Mobile]
3. Kyocera Jax S1300 [Virgin Mobile]
4. Blackberry Curve 8330 [Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS]
5. Motorola W385 [U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless]
6. T-Mobile Shadow [T-Mobile]
7. Motorola C290 [Sprint, Kajeet]
8. Motorola i335 [Sprint]
9. Motorola MOTO VE240 [Cricket, MetroPCS]
10. Blackberry Bold 9000 [AT&T]

More information: www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

Explore further: Review: Fire phone, an improvement on the familiar

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EPA promotes cell phone recycling

Jan 08, 2008

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has teamed up with cell phone makers, service providers, and retailers to promote cell phone recycling.

Cell phone may hurt child's health

Oct 09, 2007

Professor Kjell Mild of Sweden's Orbero University said young children are more at risk when using cell phones because of their thinner skulls.

Study finds mobiles excite brain cells

Jun 27, 2006

We know cell phones affect the brain. But the question of whether the electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile handsets that excite brain cells actually do any harm remains unanswered, however, by researchers ...

Recommended for you

Xbox One update is big on friends, Blu-ray 3D support

Jul 21, 2014

An Xbox One August update is arriving for early-access users. Microsoft said, "We're looking forward to hearing feedback on features before we roll them out to all Xbox One consoles next month and beyond." ...

How Kindle Unlimited compares with Scribd, Oyster

Jul 18, 2014

Amazon is the latest—and largest—company to offer unlimited e-books for a monthly fee. Here's how Kindle Unlimited, which Amazon announced Friday, compares with rivals Scribd and Oyster.

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kirkamr
5 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2009
Interesting, now has anyone looked at the risks posed by the Bluetooth headsets?
freemind
not rated yet Sep 10, 2009
Interesting, now has anyone looked at the risks posed by the Bluetooth headsets?

to my knowledge, bluetooth has a radio-frequency with a completely different wavelength, that is not hazardous for people.
Kedas
not rated yet Sep 10, 2009
Probably has no meaning for Europe since it uses other frequency bands and could obviously be set differently.
MadLintElf
not rated yet Sep 10, 2009
Great, I have a blackberry curve 8000 series.

Do they have a list with the levels of emissions?

Cheers
freemind
not rated yet Sep 10, 2009
Great, I have a blackberry curve 8000 series.
Do they have a list with the levels of emissions?
Cheers
the link is in the article: http://www.ewg.or...ilable=1
CWFlink
not rated yet Sep 10, 2009
Interesting that the lowest power phones are generally AT&T and the highest are Verizon...

...interesting in that AT&T is generally viewed as having more connection problems and Verizon as having less!

You get what you pay for I guess.... you just didn't realize WHAT you were paying for.
ThomasS
5 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2009
Interesting, now has anyone looked at the risks posed by the Bluetooth headsets?


Bluetooth headsets only need to send/receive a weak signal to a nearby transmitter/receiver, using typically 10 mW or so, which is small compared to a mobile phone which has to reach a base station that is hundreds meters away or more.

MrFred
not rated yet Sep 11, 2009
Hmmm, I wonder if low radiation directly corellates to a phone that gets poor signal. Conversly, if a phone has high radiation I bet it gets a better signal too! ;-)
Olivia
not rated yet Sep 11, 2009
Yeah, besides GSM, bluetooth, wifi, what about living near a GSM relay tower, television broadcast tower and etc?
Is the effect of holding a phone beside your skull same as living at 1km proximity to a GSM relay tower?
Does a person sitting beside a desktop or standing near a microwave oven get harmful exposure too?
spam_n_cheese
Sep 15, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
PPihkala
4 / 5 (1) Sep 15, 2009
Olivia, the effect of radiation is related to distance. So even more powerful relay tower effect get's attenuated by it's larger distance compared to phone that one holds near the head.

Living near the tower is actually good in one way, because when near the tower, your phone needs to send at lower power level and that makes the most effect to the user. One can notice this also in longer lasting battery charge, so you get more talking minutes near tower before the battery needs recharging.