New insights into health and environmental effects of carbon nanoparticles

Aug 05, 2009
Researchers are reporting that carbon nanoparticles can be transmitted by fruit flies and that certain nanoparticles can be toxic to adult flies. Credit: American Chemical Society

Carbon nanoparticles are widely used in medicine, electronics, optics, materials science and architecture, but their health and environmental impact is not fully understood.

In a series of experiments, researchers at Brown University sought to determine how carbon would affect — from the very young to adults.

The scientists found that larval showed no physical or reproductive effects from consuming carbon nanoparticles in their food. Yet adult Drosophila experienced a different fate. Tests showed adults immersed in tiny pits containing two varieties of carbon nanoparticles died within hours. Analyses of the dead flies revealed the carbon nanoparticles stuck to their bodies, covered their breathing holes, and coated their compound eyes. Scientists are unsure whether any of these afflictions led directly to the flies' death.

A separate experiment showed adult flies transported carbon nanoparticles and then deposited them elsewhere when they groomed themselves.

The findings, published online in & Technology, help to show the risks of carbon nanoparticles in the environment, said David Rand, professor of biology, who specializes in fruit fly evolution.

"The point is these same compounds that were not toxic to the (fruit fly) larvae were toxic to the adults in some cases, so there may be analogies to other toxic effects from fine particles," Rand, a co-corresponding author, said. "It may be like being in a coal mine. You get sick more from the effects of dust particles than from specific toxins in the dust."

The scientists immersed adult Drosophila in a control test tube and test tubes containing four different types of carbon nanoparticles corresponding with their commercial uses — carbon black (a powder much like printer toner), C60 (spherical molecules known as carbon buckyballs, named for Buckminster Fuller's geodesic designs), single-walled carbon nanotubes, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Flies in the test tubes with no carbon nanoparticles, C60 and the multiwalled nanotubes climbed up the tubes with few or no difficulties. But the batches of flies immersed in the carbon black and single-walled nanotubes could not escape their surroundings and died within six to 10 hours, the Brown scientists report.

The causes of death are unclear, but detailed analyses led by chemistry graduate student and lead author Xinyuan Liu showed the flies were affected physically. In some, the carbon nanoparticles covered them from wings to legs, which may have impeded their movement or weighted them down too much to climb. In others, the nanoparticles clogged their breathing holes, or spiracles, which may have suffocated them. In other adults, the nanoparticles covered the surface of their compound eyes, which may have blinded them.

The nanoparticles "glom onto the flies," Rand noted while watching a video of flies in the test tubes. "They just can't move. It's like a dinosaur falling into a tar pit." (Note to journalists: Video is available on request.)

Rand and Robert Hurt, director of Brown's Institute for Molecular and Nanoscale Innovation and the other corresponding author, said the findings are important, because they show that permutations of the same material — carbon — can have different effects in the environment.

"It's not the nanoparticle per se (that may be hazardous), but the form the nanoparticle is in," Rand said.

In another experiment led by Daniel Vinson, an undergraduate student in engineering, adult Drosophila coated in multiwalled carbon nanotubes carried the carbon on their bodies from one test tube into another and deposited some of the particles in the clean tube. That test showed how could be vectors for transporting nanomaterials, Rand said.

While two generations of fruit fly larvae showed no ill effects from eating carbon nanoparticles, the Brown scientists noticed that some of the particles ended up being stored in the flies' tissue. That means the nanoparticles could accumulate as they are passed up the food chain, Rand said.

The researchers have several related experiments in the works. They plan to test fruit flies' response to nanosilver and other nanomaterials with different chemistries, and they will investigate why the adult Drosophila died from varieties of the carbon .

Source: Brown University (news : web)

Explore further: Gold nanorods target cancer cells

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Fruit flies and global warming -- Some like it hot

Jan 26, 2007

Researchers working in Australia have discovered ways in which fruit flies might react to extreme fluctuations in temperature. Short-term exposure to high heat stress ("heat hardening") has been known to have negative effects ...

Tiny pest-eating insect fights fruit flies

Dec 06, 2007

Farmers and vineyard owners have a new weapon in their pest management arsenal. A commonly used parasitoid, or parasitic insect that kills its host, has proven to be quite effective in the control of fruit ...

Scientists get first look at nanotubes inside living animals

Sep 24, 2007

Rice University scientists have captured the first optical images of carbon nanotubes inside a living organism. Using fruit flies, the researchers confirmed that a technique developed at Rice -- near-infrared fluorescent ...

Recommended for you

Gold nanorods target cancer cells

Dec 18, 2014

Using tiny gold nanorods, researchers at Swinburne University of Technology have demonstrated a potential breakthrough in cancer therapy.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

YankInOz
1 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2009
How inconclusive can you get? Sounds like someone is looking for more funding.
Mankind has been exposed to "nano-particles" since we evolved from an atom and eve (electron volt) - we are completely composed of nano-particles. Look small enough and that is what we are.

Do precautions need to be taken in the manufacturing and disposal environments? Of course. Unless you want to rid yourself of those pesky fruit flies.

Either there is VERY intriguing (and omitted from this article) and compelling evidence to convince of the pending doom of CNT and C60 use or this scare mongers need to take a break - go fishing - smoke up (or not) - watch late night tele (sober) and get truly close to their significant other(s).

As in Chill.
zbarlici
1 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2009
Dude! these particles are so minute they can easily penetrate the cells of your body, and NO WE ARE NOT MADE OF nanopatiles wTF where in the helldid you ever get that! YOU ARE MADE OF LIVNG CELLS. more studies like this ned to be done, and quickly! Who the freak cares which way these stuies go, but they have to be done quick just in case they reveal bad medical implications. A while ago i looked up what the average nanopartile size was.. i do`t remember what theacual figure was but it was very, very minute when compared to the human/organic cells. That sht gets in you and screws up your DNA causing weird diseases the likes of which you nver seen before. If these tudies are too late and nanoparicle inclusion goes mainstram in all the products good luck trying to stop it. Just like some of the vacines and the "mild" neurolgical diseases they cause and get brushed aside as "nothing".. pharma all the way! The cases of severe neurological disease are few and far between, and wodn`t be so hard to prove if the big pharma didn`t have tebig $ to pay top lawyers. Don`t agree? well didn`t OJ get off innocent?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.