Hypertouch vs ValuClick Spam Email Case: It's Not Over Till Somebody Screams Ouch

May 07, 2009 by Mary Anne Simpson weblog

(PhysOrg.com) -- The recent decision by the Los Angeles Superior Court in Hypertouch vs ValuClick, LCO81000 decided on May 4th by Summary Judgment found that the Federal CAN-Spam Act preempted California's rigorous anti-spam, false and misleading email laws. Hypertouch, an Internet service provider got ticked because they alleged some 45,000 emails containing advertisement with fraudulent and misleading headers, were sent to its customers using specious means to collect the emails.

A motion for Summary Judgment was granted to ValuClick Inc and their affiliates because the judge found "no issue of material fact to be tried". The judge found no fraud and no evidence of a single fraudulent email was introduced. Thus, Hypertouch's claims are preempted by Federal law because judges decide matters of law and not juries. Case over, uh not so fast.

First off, the attorneys involved on both sides of the case are what might be called, the 'powerhouses' in the legal profession. Hypertouch Inc is represented by Lawrence Riff of Steptoe & Johnson and ValuClick Inc and their subsidiaries and affiliates are represented by Kevin Rosen of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. The record established over the past year sets up a clean and straight-forward appeal to test whether Congress intended to preempt the state's right to set standards for false and misleading spam emails and possibly whether a litigant is held to a higher standard of proving fraud which requires intent in order to avoid preemption.

The rocky road of the federal CAN-Spam Act began in the early 2000s. It was Congress's intent to bring uniformity to laws governing bothersome, annoying and false emails which know no domestic or international borders. Interstate commerce is the bastion for federal law. However, Congress limited CAN-Span's application in section 7701 (a) (12) "because the problems associated with the rapid growth and abuse of unsolicited commercial email cannot be solved by Federal legislation alone, the development and adoption of technological approaches... will be necessary as well."

The CAN-Spam Act was not meant to preclude states from applying laws not specific to emails, like contract, torts, trespass, computer crimes or fraud. More specifically, Congress stated in 15 USC section 7707(c), the Act should not be "construed to have any effect on the lawfulness or unlawfulness, under any other provision of law, of the adoption, implementation, or enforcement by a provider of Internet access service of a policy of declining to transmit, route, relay, handle, or store certain types of electronic mail messages."

I contacted Mr. Riff to inquire on his plans to appeal the May 4th ruling, but I haven't heard back from him yet. He has anywhere from 60-days to 180-days to file a notice of appeal after entry of judgment to perfect his appeal. In the meantime, not to be spooky, I wonder what the new Obama Administration and the little late, but still arrived Congress is going to do with CAN-Spam. As if Congress doesn't have enough on their plate. Maybe, a side of California anti-spam legislation might cut through some financial scams.

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

Explore further: Startups offer banking for smartphone users

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Court won't revive Va. anti-spam law

Mar 30, 2009

(AP) -- The Supreme Court will not consider reinstating Virginia's anti-spam law, among the nation's toughest in banning unsolicited e-mails.

Revolutionary Spam Firewall

Aug 23, 2004

The email spam nightmare could be halted in cyberspace by a groundbreaking firewall developed at The University of Queensland. The new technology is the only true spam firewall in existence, according to co-developer Matthew Sulli ...

The Web: Feds flop at stopping spam

Dec 14, 2005

The Federal Trade Commission is expected shortly to issue a report on the effectiveness of the CAN-SPAM Act, passed by Congress to combat unsolicited junk e-mail, but experts tell United Press International's The Web ahead ...

Image spam grows to 20 percent of spam

Jul 24, 2006

E-mail spam that relies on images to make it difficult to filter now encompasses 21 percent of all spam, said IronPort Systems, a San Bruno, Calif., company.

US senators seek to squash spam

Apr 03, 2009

Two US senators declared war on spam on Thursday. Senator Olympia Snowe, a Republican from Maine, and Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida, introduced legislation aimed at curbing unsolicited text ...

Internet 'flooded with swine virus spam emails'

Apr 30, 2009

Spam emails using "swine flu" as a keyword phrase have flooded the Internet as opportunists seek to exploit concerns over the outbreak of the virus, a global cyber security firm warned Thursday.

Recommended for you

Startups offer banking for smartphone users

19 hours ago

The latest banks are small enough to fit in the palm of your hand. Startups, such as Moven and Simple, offer banking that's designed specifically for smartphones, enabling users to track their spending on the go. Some things ...

'SwaziLeaks' looks to shake up jet-setting monarchy

Aug 29, 2014

As WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange prepares to end a two-year forced stay at Ecuador's London embassy, he may take comfort in knowing he inspired resistance to secrecy in places as far away as Swaziland.

Ecuador heralds digital currency plans (Update)

Aug 29, 2014

Ecuador is planning to create what it calls the world's first digital currency issued by a central bank, which some analysts believe could be a first step toward abandoning the country's existing currency, ...

WEF unveils 'crowdsourcing' push on how to run the Web

Aug 28, 2014

The World Economic Forum unveiled a project on Thursday aimed at connecting governments, businesses, academia, technicians and civil society worldwide to brainstorm the best ways to govern the Internet.

User comments : 0