Strap-On Helicopter Could Offer Solo Flying Experience

May 02, 2008 by Lisa Zyga weblog
Strap-on helicopter
Technologia Aeroespacial Mexicana (TAM) has designed a strap-on helicopter. Tiny rockets on the tips of the propellers eliminate the need for a tail rotor, making it possible for the device to be worn on a human body. Credit: TAM.

Ever since the first human saw a bird soaring through the clouds, our species has harbored a great envy for the freedom that flying gives.

Now a company from Mexico is trying to capitalize on this desire with their design for a strap-on helicopter, which is intended to be worn on the back of an individual and lift them into the air. The idea is not new, but the technology may have some novelty, although details are sparse.

Technologia Aeroespacial Mexicana (TAM), the company behind the Libelula strap-on helicopter, explains on its Web site how the device is powered by two hydrogen fuel canisters. Tiny rockets at the tips of the helicopter´s rotor blades take the place of a tail rotor, a component which couldn´t be safely attached to a human body. According to the company, the Libelula would be the lightest helicopter in the world, so light that it could be strapped to a person´s body with a carbon fiber corset.

"The best [part] of this technology is that [these] kinds of helicopters don´t need a tail rotor because they don´t have any torque, so with a simple vane they can turn - being the simplest form of an helicopter and the easiest and safer to fly," the company says on its Web site.

At the moment, the idea is just an idea. However, the company has a successful history of developing and fabricating a variety of hydrogen peroxide rockets, jet packs, a flying rocket belt, rocket bicycles, and other similar machines. And on its Web site, the company claims to have most of the components for the Libelula helicopter - many of which are the same as those on the rocket belt - and suggests that it is only a matter of time before embarking on a test flight.

More information: Technologia Aeroespacial Mexicana

via: DVICE

Explore further: Creative adaptation of a quadcopter

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Tesla says decision on battery factory months away

15 hours ago

(AP)—Electric car maker Tesla Motors said Thursday that it is preparing a site near Reno, Nevada, as a possible location for its new battery factory, but is still evaluating other sites.

Comfortable climate indoors with porous glass

Jul 31, 2014

Proper humidity and temperature play a key role in indoor climate. In the future, establishing a comfortable indoor environment may rely on porous glass incorporated into plaster, as this regulates moisture ...

Crash-testing rivets

Jul 31, 2014

Rivets have to reliably hold the chassis of an automobile together – even if there is a crash. Previously, it was difficult to predict with great precision how much load they could tolerate. A more advanced ...

Customized surface inspection

Jul 31, 2014

The quality control of component surfaces is a complex undertaking. Researchers have engineered a high-precision modular inspection system that can be adapted on a customer-specific basis and integrated into ...

User comments : 25

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fleem
4.7 / 5 (3) May 02, 2008
Anyone that doesn't think this is dangerous, raise your hand.
trantor
4.3 / 5 (3) May 02, 2008
reminds me of the old videogame H.E.R.O.

but yes... COMPLETELY dangerous.
Andeddo
5 / 5 (2) May 02, 2008
Go go gadget helicopter!!!
Egnite
not rated yet May 02, 2008
Crossing the street is dangerous, almost everything is dangerous unless used carefully and safely!

It would be cleaner than driving so I'd prefer one to an internal combustion engined car. No traffic either, how quick could you get to work? Think I'll wait for all the creases to be ironed out first as I don't want to be a guinea pig falling out the sky.
earls
4.3 / 5 (3) May 02, 2008
Well, it has possibilities... The rocket-on-tips concept sounds very interesting.

Although calculations are needed, "autorotation" might make the device slightly viable during an emergency loss of power.

It would suck if you're buzzing along and see someone you know and raise your hand to wave...

But lets be honest, being designed by Mexicans you know there's only one thing on their mind, jump-flying that border fence.
Mercury_01
4.7 / 5 (3) May 02, 2008
Just what Ive always wanted, a MEXICAN HELICOPTER! limme git my duct tape so i can chrome it out!
vlam67
not rated yet May 02, 2008
Very interesting technical idea...but i think inherently deadly. Imagine:
1- As automobile replacement: Rush hour traffic would be interesting to say the least. Now you don't worry about pile-ups, rather than getting chopped to bits...
2- If you crash, the blades will fly off and take out bystanders, or your body parts...
3- Gyroscopic forces means you have to lean 90 degrees earlier in the direction of the rotating blades, making directional control totally awkward, eg for clockwise rotating rotor (viewed from overhead) to go forward you lean left...
4- If your personal heli throws a blades, bye bye. You will be shaken and stirred to bits, and the coroners will have trouble counting the broken bones...
Corvidae
5 / 5 (1) May 02, 2008
It's an awesome idea...to bad the public could never be trusted to own them. The safety/security concerns would reach ludicrous levels.
Minnaloushe
not rated yet May 02, 2008
I have a hat with a propeller on top....
googleplex
not rated yet May 02, 2008
Might I add that the prospect of carrying hydrogen cylinders strapped to ones back and being able to fly like superman is a terrorist dream. The rockets would make a perfect dual ignition source.
Isn't hydrogen more expensive than gasoline to manufacture and store.
trantor
not rated yet May 02, 2008
Egnite, what a poor analogy. Yes, driving is dangerous. But this personal helicopter is more akin to driving a Kart against oncoming traffic in a highway filled with buses and trucks.
zevkirsh
not rated yet May 02, 2008
this shit rocks.
Soylent
5 / 5 (1) May 02, 2008
It would be cleaner than driving so I'd prefer one to an internal combustion engined car.


Hardly, you're just outsourcing the pollution to a coal gasification plant somewhere out of sight, out of mind.

No traffic either, how quick could you get to work?


By the time you get your hands on one there'll be LOTS of traffic.

It's an absolute air traffic control nightmare. The fuel economy is crap. For safety reasons you'd have to fly only in dedicated air traffic corridors, declare your expected flight path in advance, wait your turn at a designated landing area, wear a transponder and always be reachable by radio.

It's not any kind of technical problem that is preventing you and always will prevent you from owning and operating a personal aircraft.
Soylent
5 / 5 (1) May 02, 2008
Isn't hydrogen more expensive than gasoline to manufacture and store.


Hydrogen gas is produced from coal or natural gas.

Coal can be gasified and undergo water-gas shift, producing 2 hydrogen gas molecules per carbon.

Natural gas can similarly be steam reformed to produce hydrogen gas. You get 4 hydrogen gas molecules for one molecule of methane(2 for the carbon and 2 for the 4 hydrogen atoms in methane).

With the possible exception of high temperature electrolysis using nuclear power, electrolysis is not competitive with coal or gas.

Hydrogen gas is difficult to store and has a strong tendency to leak.
Sean_W
2 / 5 (4) May 02, 2008
Terrorists use lots of technology but they fail to use it as well as the military and law enforcement organizations. If you just want to get a bomb somewhere a heavy weight RC model airplane with video feed and GPS navigation would suffice but if you want to get skilled snipers, engineers and other specialists into an area and out, these individual choppers would need to be part of a much more coordinated system.

The hand raising issue could be resolved with a taller "mast" or with shock bracelets that zap you if you bring your hand too close to the blade. I think that a fair degree of training would always be required to use something like this though - unless a modified version could incorporate a tilt resistant roll cage. There is already an enterprise that is making (if not marketing) a single person helicopter for ranchers, large area landowners and such, called (I think) the Mosquito.
Sean_W
1 / 5 (3) May 02, 2008
Here is a story on the personal helicopter called "Mosquito":
http://www.realte...sts/1878
I first saw it on a Canadian Discovery Channel show, Daily Planet.
weewilly
not rated yet May 03, 2008
I wonder what the pay is for the first test pilot?
Ron78
not rated yet May 03, 2008
Oh well, so much for that border fence, huh?
WolfAtTheDoor
not rated yet May 03, 2008
Helicopters have a rear prop, otherwise the craft would spin out of control. I don't see that on this contraption. I'll file this one under 'terrible ideas'.
photojack
not rated yet May 04, 2008
I'll wait for FAA approval. I DID look into getting an ultralight aircraft at one time, when I owned 12 acres and could have had my own runway. With this "whopper of a chopper", one could take off from a suburban yard, rooftop or city street. Bystanders and pedestrians beware!
WolfAtTheDoor, The article addressed the lack of the need for a tail rotor by having the blade-tip propulsion. Apparently SOME testing has been done. Are they looking for volunteer test pilots? :-)
fleem
not rated yet May 04, 2008
Just on a side note, the blade tip rockets are a VERY old idea. Much older than the oldest patents you can find on the matter (which is par for the course when it comes to patents :/ ). Ramjets were typically used. BTW, that thing would also be REALLY LOUD.
superhuman
2 / 5 (1) May 04, 2008
>The best [part] of this technology is that [these] kinds of helicopters don't need a tail rotor because they don't have any torque

Of course they have torque, plenty of it, everything that rotates in the air has got to have torque to counteract friction!

The thing is that the special kind of torque that is the main source of helicopters rotation on the vertical axis (engine is pushing the axle in one direction while at the same time pushing itself in the other in relation to stationary observer) is not present.
But as the bearings are not ideal there will be torque acting on the pilot related to the friction in the main bearing. This effect is surly much smaller (and opposite direction) to the effect in normal helicopters but its present.

Lovely concept, dangerous to be sure but still worth trying out imo.
AngryLabRat
not rated yet May 05, 2008
Wow, that's great! Now anyone can experience the miracle of flight with a loud engine, potentially decapitating blades, and explosive rockets and hydrogen fuel strapped to their head and back! Genius!

For more comments on this article, please see my blog post on it at:
http://angrylabra...ion.html
Zig158
5 / 5 (1) May 06, 2008
Modern jet packs only give you 30 seconds of flight time, I can%u2019t see this giving you more than a few minutes. It would be a neat toy.
helicopters
5 / 5 (1) Oct 09, 2008
These guys will never get past the safety government regulators. It's suicide on one of these. You always have to have a "what do I do if all fails" plan. This one is to say your prayers and die.

http://www.heline...ion.com/