Are America's cities prepared for the drought, heat, and floods of climate change?

March 7, 2016
Argonne generated maps to show how Maine’s climate would change under a high emissions scenario.

From September 2012 until March 2013, Australia sweltered. And burned.

The worst heat wave recorded in the continent's history sent temperatures soaring well over 100°F for weeks. Fires spread along the coasts and across Tasmania. In the Outback, roads melted.

News reports called it the "angry summer." It was so bad that it literally changed the map: meteorologists had to add two new color bands to their maps on the evening weather reports, to go up to 130°.

So Australians turned on the air conditioning. The electric grid suffered in both Melbourne and Sydney. Urban railways were delayed as heat damaged the wiring. A report later that year found the heat wave was almost certainly beyond the bounds of natural climate variation.

Scientists agree that the future will bring higher temperatures for longer periods of time, higher sea levels, and both more droughts and more storms. "This means that our infrastructure, as it exists today, isn't going to be able to operate at the same level in the future," said Megan Clifford, deputy director of the Risk and Infrastructure Science Center at Argonne.

Fires in Tasmania visible from the air during Australia’s “angry summer.” Credit: Chuq/Wikimedia Commons/CC-BY-SA-3.0

Infrastructure is, by design, largely unnoticed until it breaks and service fails. It's the water supply, the gas lines, bridges and dams, phone lines and cell towers, roads and culverts, train lines and railways, and the electric grid; all of the complex systems that keep our society and economy running.

Engineers typically design systems to withstand reasonable worst-case conditions based on historical records; for example, an engineer builds a bridge strong enough to withstand floods based on historical rainfall and flooding. But what happens when the worst case is no longer bad enough?

"If we don't adapt the systems, they will break," said Duane Verner, an urban planner who works with Clifford.

"When you look at cities' long-term plans, which every city has—and they go out decades for planning major infrastructure—they rarely have local climate projections available for their planning assumptions or design criteria," Clifford said.

A major difficulty, she explained, is that it's difficult for city planners to look at a large-scale climate model and understand the impacts to their local area.

That's where Argonne scientists and researchers are bridging the gap. Argonne's infrastructure experts are just a building over from climate scientists in the environmental science division and supercomputing resources at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility. They can develop and interpret the complex global to predict the effects of climate change by region.

The Risk and Infrastructure Science Center can pull all of these forces together with other subject matter experts, including engineers and analysts with experience in various infrastructure industries. Combining these resources helps them develop practical and comprehensive analyses for planners. These tools not only help analyze risks, but also prioritize them in light of tight budgets.

One type of analysis that Argonne frequently conducts is called an RRAP—the Regional Resiliency Assessment Program. Every year, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security funds several assessments that each look at a particular area's vulnerabilities.

Verner is part of a team working on an RRAP for the Casco Bay region of Maine. Like other regions they've studied, they are finding that floods, heat waves, and other changes predicted for Maine could cause trouble for its infrastructure.

For example, in general, power plants don't like heat—their output declines, some types more than others. The same is true for transmission lines; they lose some ability to carry electricity in the heat.

"This change is in the margins, but when you add that together with increased demand for power to run air conditioning, for example, you can cross the thresholds for brownouts," Verner said.

Then there's rain. "The climate models are showing that increases in extreme precipitation events are projected for the entire U.S., because there's more humidity in the atmosphere," Verner said, "and structures like culverts, that are built to standards for past historical rainfall events, won't be able to accommodate this rush of rain." (Culverts are pipes that channel streams and water underneath roads.)

Too much rain all at once causes floods, and floods are devastating to infrastructure. Water is extraordinarily destructive. Hurricane Sandy shut down New York City, one of the largest, most prosperous cities in the world, for days. Floods wash out roads and bridges, damage homes, schools, and buildings, and overwhelm sewer systems, causing sewage dumps into local waterways; the economic impact can be severe. Sandy caused $65 billion worth of damage.

At the same time, we've also seen record droughts in recent years. "Generally, planners are using historical records for droughts in their water resource planning processes, and our climate models show that, in many cases, historical records won't provide an adequate worst-case scenario to plan for," Verner said. "It will be much worse."

Droughts are financially ruinous for farmers and agriculture; that same year as Sandy, 2012, saw a Midwest/Plains drought that cost $35 billion.

That drought saw the mighty Mississippi River drop to such low levels that shipping on the river, which normally carries billions of dollars of cargo every month, was nearly halted. "I have never seen anything like it," Colonel Chris Hall, commander of the Corps of Engineers' St. Louis District, told the Chicago Tribune.

In response, Argonne researchers scrambled to analyze the potential economic impacts if water levels dipped below a certain point on the middle Mississippi River. Billions of dollars of cargo are shipped on the river every month; power plants pull cooling water; and local communities draw water, including drinking and irrigation water. The analysis quantified the thousands of jobs and billions in income that could be in jeopardy across six states for a worst-case scenario drought.

These kinds of analyses help federal, state, and local governments understand stakes and prioritize action. With the help of the Risk and Infrastructure Science Center, as well as resiliency efforts in multiple areas at Argonne, planners can find out the types of stresses their cities and regions will face in the future.

Infrastructure is generally an ounce-of-prevention game; smart changes now can save a region billions of dollars in damages and lost economic productivity in the future. Communities can ration water from aquifers, shore up electric grids, and build roads out of water's reach. New estimates of rainfall help engineers determine what kind of storms their bridges should withstand; power companies can estimate energy demand in upcoming heat waves. They just need to know what they're facing.

"Our goal is to help planners get the information they need to do their jobs, and to drive national efforts for future resilient infrastructure design," Clifford said.

With the ongoing involvement of Argonne and the scientific community, infrastructure can be adapted and designed to withstand the changes ahead—before it breaks.

Explore further: (Rain)cloud computing: Researchers work to improve how we predict climate change

Related Stories

Desalination plants a 'hidden asset' for power, water

March 3, 2016

Renewable hydropower generated from desalination plants and other existing infrastructure would bring economic and environmental benefits to our biggest cities, according to new research from Griffith University.

Measuring climate change action

June 23, 2015

Reducing global greenhouse gas emissions could have big benefits in the U.S., according to a report released today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), including thousands of avoided deaths from extreme heat, ...

Recommended for you

Increasing tornado outbreaks—is climate change responsible?

December 1, 2016

Tornadoes and severe thunderstorms kill people and damage property every year. Estimated U.S. insured losses due to severe thunderstorms in the first half of 2016 were $8.5 billion. The largest U.S. impacts of tornadoes result ...

10 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1.6 / 5 (7) Mar 07, 2016


An Ode to you climate blame science red necks at phys.org

It's safe to say

after 35 years

of climate action delay

that CO2 is the new Y2K²

It's time to draw the curtain

on your Al Gore consultant

that was only 99% certain

that a CO2 Armageddon

"could be" a resultant.

But they are certain

the planet is not flat

even though they are only

99% certain CO2

"could" put it on it's back

Exaggerating vague science

was not progressive

And history will judge it

as libs gone "goregressive".
antigoracle
1.7 / 5 (6) Mar 07, 2016
Are America's cities prepared...

Absolutely. The doom and gloom of the AGW Cult will never come to pass and the only one not prepared for that are the Chicken Littles. No worries though, that problem will easily be solved with some special Kool Aid.
ab3a
5 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2016
Never mind American cities, is ANY city ready for drought or floods? The answer is actually whether the city has grown beyond what the planners over a century ago were considering.

Many cities have quietly outgrown what the infrastructure planners from decades past had conceived. Thankfully resources are used more efficiently these days. Nevertheless, even that has limits. Conservation is only one tool in the bag of options that we're facing. There are other things to consider including expanding resources and reusing existing ones.
Manfred Particleboard
4.3 / 5 (6) Mar 07, 2016
Pah!
The fact you have connected Gore and liberalism with climate issues
can only mean it's not about fact but ideology for you lot, and a warped one.
Y2K was the fizzle it was because of the countless manhours fixing the problem.
Only 99% certain?...Hey I'm 99% certain you've inherited 1.2M dollars.
'Not interested...there's 1% chance I haven't!'

1984 was a utopian manifesto to you wasn't it?

Keep playin' the fiddle grasshoppers.
Zzzzzzzz
4 / 5 (4) Mar 07, 2016
The USA, as the richest country in the world, "cannot afford" to fix infrastructure. Just listen to the Koch brothers and the Republicans. Evidently, if you are Republican and cannot afford food, the only honorable course of action is to starve your children to death, rather than go make more money.
I always take another approach. I go and earn more. I've actually gotten quite good at it. Sure beats starvation, and makes for a much happier life.....
antigoracle
1 / 5 (4) Mar 07, 2016
The Dust Bowl (1931-1939)
With the Great Depression already making life difficult, a drought struck the Great Plains in 1931 and essentially lasted for the rest of the decade. Combined with short-sighted agricultural practices, it induced huge clouds of dust that turned skies dark, lodged in residents' lungs, and precipitated a mass migration to greener pastures. The apex came in 1934, which NASA researchers recently called the worst drought year of the last millennium in North America. Not far behind was 1936, when, amid the dust storms, a devastating summer heat wave killed upwards of 5,000 Americans and 1,100 Canadians.

leetennant
5 / 5 (5) Mar 07, 2016
Never mind American cities, is ANY city ready for drought or floods? The answer is actually whether the city has grown beyond what the planners over a century ago were considering.

Many cities have quietly outgrown what the infrastructure planners from decades past had conceived. Thankfully resources are used more efficiently these days. Nevertheless, even that has limits. Conservation is only one tool in the bag of options that we're facing. There are other things to consider including expanding resources and reusing existing ones.


We're not talking about building in areas designated as 1 in 500 flood areas and having to deal with the consequences of large weather events. We're talking about what are currently 1 in 500 year events now applying to the ENTIRE city area. We're talking about Miami and Bangkok and London ceasing to exist because the coastline has shifted.

The planning data these cities are based on is being rendered obsolete.
ab3a
1 / 5 (2) Mar 10, 2016
The planning data these cities are based on is being rendered obsolete.


The planners of most cities worked with the best technology they could muster at the time. That's no guarantee their assumptions would be correct, however. Not to put too fine a point on it, but in the 1960's and 70s people were worried about global cooling and drought due to falling sea levels. So they estimated and built accordingly.

Those who design the infrastructure for cities are not clairvoyant. They get things wrong for very legitimate reasons. And some day you will be wrong too, for very legitimate reasons. Learn to laugh, and do your best. Nobody made these mistakes purposefully.
leetennant
5 / 5 (1) Mar 11, 2016
And if we were saying they were wrong in their planning assessments, that would be vaguely relevant. Since that's not remotely what anybody is saying, it's not even vaguely irrelevant.
Shootist
1 / 5 (2) Mar 12, 2016
Freeman Dyson says the models used to predict future climate are fatally flawed and offer no valid insights.

When Dyson says your maths are rubbish, they probably are.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.