Study shows a way to tell if your hamster is happy

July 29, 2015 by Bob Yirka report
The golden hamster or Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Credit: Wikipedia

(Phys.org)—A pair of researchers at Liverpool John Moores University in the U.K. believe they have found a way to measure happiness in hamsters. In their paper published in Royal Society Open Science, Emily Bethell and Nicola Koyama describe behavioral studies they carried out with hamsters, what they learned and why they believe their results indicate that hamsters, like other mammals, have feelings, or moods.

Anyone who has ever owned and cared for a pet hamster has faced the same problem—knowing if the creature is happy, or at least content with its living arrangements. Hamsters don't offer much in the way of feedback and because of that Bethell and Koyama looked to see if there might be any other ways to measure their "happiness" level, such as by using what scientists call judgment bias—where an animal (including humans) will tend to behave more optimistically when they are feeling good emotionally. Such studies have been conducted on many species, but not with hamsters.

The new study consisted of training a group of 30 hamsters to associate water bottles placed in a certain locations in their cage with sugar-water, which the hamsters really like, in some places and bitter quinine, which they hate in other areas and then dividing the group into two—half of the group were transferred to really nice cages, with chew toys, wheels, nice wood chips underfoot, etc. The other half lived a much more austere existence. Then, the researchers added more bottles to the original cage, some with sugar-water, some with quinine and others with plain water, and then tested how all 30 of the hamsters reacted. The thinking was that happy hamsters would be more open to testing the new bottles to see if they held something sweet. Sure enough, the hamsters that had been living the good life were much more receptive to trying all the other bottles, while those, presumably less happy with their recent abode, moped and mostly only sipped at the bottles they knew would offer a sweet reward.

The study doesn't prove that half of the hamsters were actually happier or sadder, but it does appear to show that do better when living under better conditions, which, in retrospect, likely doesn't come as a surprise, because who doesn't?

Explore further: Bug vs. bug: Benign C. difficile strains keep fatal strains at bay

More information: Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus, Royal Society Open Science, DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140399

Abstract
Recent developments in the study of animal cognition and emotion have resulted in the 'judgement bias' model of animal welfare. Judgement biases describe the way in which changes in affective state are characterized by changes in information processing. In humans, anxiety and depression are characterized by increased expectation of negative events and negative interpretation of ambiguous information. Positive wellbeing is associated with enhanced expectation of positive outcomes and more positive interpretation of ambiguous information. Mood-congruent judgement biases for ambiguous information have been demonstrated in a range of animal species, with large variation in the way tests are administered and in the robustness of analyses. We highlight and address some issues using a laboratory species not previously tested: the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Hamsters were tested using a spatial judgement go/no-go task in enriched and unenriched housing. We included a number of controls and additional behavioural tests and applied a robust analytical approach using linear mixed effects models. Hamsters approached the ambiguous cues significantly more often when enriched than unenriched. There was no effect of enrichment on responses to the middle cue. We discuss these findings in light of mechanisms underlying processing cues to reward, punishment and true ambiguity, and the implications for the welfare of laboratory hamsters.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Atlas of the RNA universe takes shape

December 7, 2016

As the floor plan of the living world, DNA guides the composition of animals ranging from unicellular organisms to humans. DNA not only helps shepherd every organism from birth through death, it also plays an essential role ...

Gene "bookmarking" regulates the fate of stem cells

December 7, 2016

A protein that stays attached on chromosomes during cell division plays a critical role in determining the type of cell that stem cells can become. The discovery, made by EPFL scientists, has significant implications for ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bluehigh
5 / 5 (1) Jul 29, 2015
Thanks Bob. A light and interesting article.

Those of you that know of the Young Ones TV shows might appreciate me wanting to name a hamster SPG.

However, in Australia it is unlawful to keep a Hamster as a pet. They are classified as pests and negatively affect flora and fauna.

antigoracle
1 / 5 (1) Jul 29, 2015
Hang in there mate, you no longer need a criminal record to get into the country, so this hamster thing can change. In the meanwhile how about a pet croc?
SciTechdude
not rated yet Jul 29, 2015
They ARE pests, and as a former pet owner of several I can tell you that they live to escape and breed in the wild. They are smart critters, and no amount of cage will keep them in forever. They gestate in just 16 days after pregnancy, can have a litter of 4-6, and are ready to do it again within a week and change. They have no issues inbreeding, and in a matter of months you could have hundreds of them running around.

Hang in there Antigoracle, one day you might say something intelligent on accident. In the meantime, I suggest a pet rock.
MrVibrating
not rated yet Jul 29, 2015
Actually, they have the remarkable ability to initiate a new pregnancy BEFORE delivering an imminent litter. They're breeding machines alright..

Wonderful pets tho, i've had many, most of which i co-habited with rather than locking in their cages. I'd place wheels and treats in various rooms and after i'd gone to bed they'd leave their cages, go play, run on the wheels, take the treats back to the cage and stash them...

I had (still have in storage) an extensive Rotastack system, connected to multiple large wire cages, so they had their own little artificial warrens to live in, but with various openings so they could come and go as they liked.

Surprsingly, they're also quite trainable (Syrians especially), and can even be called by name - i could call them clambering out of the cage, across the floor and running up my leg as i sat on the sofa across the room, to sit on my lap and see what goodies i had for them..

Keeping 'em imprisoned in small cages is just so cruel!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.