Complex genetic ancestry of Americans uncovered

March 24, 2015
Credit: George Hodan/public domain

By comparing the genes of current-day North and South Americans with African and European populations, an Oxford University study has found the genetic fingerprints of the slave trade and colonisation that shaped migrations to the Americas hundreds of years ago.

The team, which also included researchers from UCL (University College London) and the Universita' del Sacro Cuore of Rome, analysed more than 4,000 previously collected DNA samples from 64 different populations, covering multiple locations in Europe, Africa and the Americas. Since migration has generally flowed from Africa and Europe to the Americas over the last few hundred years, the team compared the 'donor' African and European populations with 'recipient' American populations to track where the ancestors of current-day North and South Americans came from.

'We found that the genetic profile of Americans is much more complex than previously thought,' said study leader Professor Cristian Capelli from the Department of Zoology at Oxford University.

The study found that:

  • While Spaniards provide the majority of European ancestry in continental American Hispanic/Latino populations, the most common European genetic source in African-Americans and Barbadians comes from Great Britain.
  • The Basques, a distinct ethnic group spread across current-day Spain and France, provided a small but distinct genetic contribution to current-day Continental South American populations, including the Maya in Mexico.
  • The Caribbean Islands of Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic are genetically similar to each other and distinct from the other populations, probably reflecting a different migration pattern between the Caribbean and mainland America.
  • Compared to South Americans, people from Caribbean countries (such as the Barbados) had a larger genetic contribution from Africa.
  • The ancestors of current-day Yoruba people from West Africa (one of the largest African ethnic groups) provided the largest contribution of genes from Africa to all current-day American populations.
  • The proportion of African ancestry varied across the continent, from virtually zero (in the Maya people from Mexico) to 87% in current-day Barbados.
  • South Italy and Sicily also provided a significant European genetic contribution to Colombia and Puerto Rico, in line with the known history of Italian emigrants to the Americas in the late 19th and early 20th century
  • One of the African-American groups from the USA had French ancestry, in agreement with historical French immigration into the colonial Southern United States.
  • The proportion of genes from European versus African sources varied greatly from individual to individual within recipient populations.

The research team analysed DNA samples collected from people in Barbados, Columbia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Puerto Rico and African-Americans in the USA.

The scientists used a technique called haplotype-based analysis to compare the pattern of genes in these 'recipient populations' to 'donor populations' in areas where migrants to America came from.

'We firstly grouped subsets of people in Africa and Europe who were genetically similar and used this fine scale resolution to find which combinations of these clusters resulted in the sort of mixtures that we now see in people across the Americas', said study author Dr Francesco Montinaro from Oxford University's Department of Zoology.

'We can see the huge genetic impact that the slave trade had on American populations and our data match historical records', said study author Dr Garrett Hellenthal from the UCL Genetics Institute, 'The majority of African Americans have ancestry similar to the Yoruba people in West Africa, confirming that most African slaves came from this region. In areas of the Americas historically under Spanish rule, populations also have ancestry related to what is now Senegal and Gambia. Records show that around a third of the slaves sent to Spanish America in the 17th Century came from this region, and we can see the genetic evidence of this in modern Americans really clearly.'

These genetic findings also uncover previously unknown migration. 'We found a clear from the Basques in modern-day Maya in Mexico', said Oxford University's Professor Cristian Capelli. 'This suggests that the Basque also took part in the colonisation of the Americas, coming over either with the Spanish conquistadores or in later waves of migration.

'The differences in European ancestry between the Caribbean islands and mainland American that we found were also previously unknown. It is likely that these differences reflect different patterns of migration between the Caribbean and mainland America.

'These results show just how powerful a genetic approach can be when it comes to uncovering hidden patterns of ancestry. We hope to use the same approach to look at other populations with diverse genetic contributions, such as Brazilians', said Professor Capelli.

Explore further: Genetic makeup of Hispanic/Latino Americans influenced by Native American, European and African-American ancestries

More information: Unravelling the hidden ancestry of American admixed populations , Nature Communications, 2015.

Related Stories

Understanding genetic mixing through migration

June 11, 2010

Understanding the genetic ancestry of mixed populations, such as those found in North America, can not only help to detect their origins but also to understand the genetic basis of complex diseases, a scientist will tell ...

Recommended for you

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Americas
not rated yet Mar 24, 2015
In the following sentence does "American populations" refer only to the USA or to the Americas i.e. North, South and Central America?

"The ancestors of current-day Yoruba people from West Africa (one of the largest African ethnic groups) provided the largest contribution of genes from Africa to all current-day American populations."
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2015
No mention of how the English mated Irish slave women with black slaves in the Caribbean in the 1600s?
Vietvet
1 / 5 (1) Mar 28, 2015
@ryggy

As much has the Irish were despised by the English and has badly as they were treated they weren't slaves. Their indentured servitude may have been forced (as it was for many of the English) it was time limited. A female indentured servant who became pregnant and gave birth had her term of indenture extended but even if the father was black the child wasn't a slave. On the other hand a child of a black female slave and a white father was considered the property of
indenture holder, regardless of whether he was the father.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.