Planets orbiting red dwarfs may stay wet enough for life

February 9, 2015 by Charles Q. Choi, Astrobiology Magazine
Oceans currents would transport heat to the dark side of tidally-locked exoplanets.Credit: Lynette Cook

Small, cold stars known as red dwarfs are the most common type of star in the Universe, and the sheer number of planets that may exist around them potentially make them valuable places to hunt for signs of extraterrestrial life.

However, previous research into around suggested that while they may be warm enough to host life, they might also completely dry out, with any water they possess locked away permanently as ice. New research published on the topic finds that these planets may stay wet enough for life after all. The scientists detailed their findings online on November 12 in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Red dwarfs, also known as M stars, are roughly one-fifth as massive as the Sun and up to 50 times fainter. These stars comprise up to 70 percent of the stars in the cosmos, and NASA's Kepler space observatory has discovered that at least half of these stars host rocky planets that are one-half to four times the mass of Earth.

Red dwarf planets are potentially key places to search for life as we know it, not just because there are so many of them, but also because of their incredible longevity. Unlike our Sun, which will die in a few billion years, red dwarfs will take trillions of years to burn through their fuel, significantly longer than the age of the Universe, which is less than 14 billion years old. This longevity potentially gives red dwarfs a great deal more time for life to evolve around them.

Research into whether a distant world might host life as we know it usually focuses on whether or not it has liquid water, since there is life virtually everywhere there is liquid water on Earth, even miles underground. Scientists typically concentrate on habitable zones, the area around a star where it is neither too hot for all its surface water to boil away, nor too cold enough for all its surface water to freeze.

Recent findings suggest that planets in the habitable zones of red dwarf stars could accumulate significant amounts of water. In fact, each planet could possess about 25 times more water than Earth.

The of red dwarfs are close to these stars because of how dim they are, often closer than the distance Mercury orbits the Sun. This closeness makes them appealing to astrobiologists, since planets near their stars cross in front of them more often, making them easier to detect than planets that orbit farther away.

However, when a planet orbits very near a star, the star's gravitational pull can force the world to become "tidally locked" to it. When a planet is tidally locked to its star, it will always show the same side to its star, just as the Moon always shows the same side to Earth. This causes the planet to have one permanent day side and one permanent night side.

The extremes of heat and cold that tidally locked planets experience could make them profoundly different from Earth. For example, prior research speculated the dark sides of tidally locked planets would become so cold that any water there would freeze. Sunlight would make water on the sunlit side evaporate, and this water vapor could get carried by air currents to the night sides, eventually leading to sheets of ice miles thick on the night sides and removing all water from the sunlit sides. Life as we know it probably could not develop on the day sides of such planets. Although they would have sunlight for photosynthesis, they would have no water to serve as the primordial soup for life to swim in.

To see how habitable tidally-locked planets really are, scientists devised a 3D global climate model of planets that simulated interactions between the atmosphere, ocean, , and land, as well as a 3-D model of ice sheets large enough to cover entire continents. They also simulated a red dwarf with a temperature of about 5,660 degrees Fahrenheit (3,125 degrees Celsius), and investigated whether all the water on these planets would indeed get trapped on their night sides.

"I've been interested in trying to make calculations relevant for M-star planet habitability since being convinced by astronomers that these types of planets will likely be closest (in proximity) to Earth," said study co-author Dorian Abbot, a geoscientist at the University of Chicago.

For instance, the nearest known star to the Sun, Proxima Centauri, is a red dwarf, and it remains uncertain whether or not it has a planet. The possibility that red dwarf planets might be relatively near to Earth "means that anything geoscientists can tell astronomers about habitability of these planets will be essential for planning future missions."

The researchers simulated planets of Earth's size and gravity that experienced between 63 percent and 77 percent as much sunlight as Earth. They also modeled a super-Earth planet 50 percent wider than Earth with 38 percent stronger gravity, because astronomers have discovered super-Earth worlds around red dwarfs. For instance, Gliese 667Cb, a super-Earth at least 4.5 times the mass of Earth, orbits Gliese 667C, a red dwarf about 22 light years from Earth. They set this super-Earth on an orbit where it received about two-thirds as much as sunlight as Earth.

The researchers modeled three different arrangements of continents for all these planets. One was a water world with no continents and global oceans of varying depths. Another involved a supercontinent covering the night side and an ocean covering the day side. The last mimicked Earth's configuration of continents. The planets also had atmospheres similar to Earth's, but the researchers also tested lower levels of the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, which traps heat and helps keep planets warm.

When it came to super-Earths covered entirely in water, and super-Earths with continental arrangements like Earth's, the researchers found it was unlikely that all their water would get trapped on their night sides.

"This is because surface winds transport sea ice to the day side where it is melted easily," said lead study author Jun Yang at the University of Chicago.

Moreover, ocean currents transport heat from the day side to the night side on these planets.

"Ocean heat transport strongly influences the climate and sea ice thickness on our Earth," Yang said. "We found this may also work on exoplanets."

If a super-Earth has very large continents covering most of its night side, the scientists discovered ice sheets of at least 3,300 feet (1,000 meters) thick could grow on its night side. However, the day sides of these super-Earths would dry out completely only if they received less geothermal heat from volcanic activity than Earth, and had 10 percent of the amount of water on Earth's surface or less. Similar results were seen with Earth-sized planets.

"The important implication is that it may be easier than previously thought to keep on the dayside of a tidally locked planet, where photosynthesis is possible," Abbot said. "There are many issues that will affect the habitability of M-star planets, but our results suggest at least that -trapping on the night side will only be a problem for relatively dry planets with large continents on their nightside and relatively low geothermal heat flux."

Based on present and near-future technology, Yang said it would be very difficult for astronomers to gauge how thick the sea ice or the ice sheets are on the night sides of red dwarf planets and test whether their models are correct. Still, using current and upcoming technology "it may be possible to know whether the day sides are dry or not," Yang said.

Explore further: Lobster-shaped extrasolar oceans

More information: "Water Trapping on Tidally Locked Terrestrial Planets Requires Special Conditions." Jun Yang et al. 2014 ApJ 796 L22. DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/796/2/L22

Related Stories

Lobster-shaped extrasolar oceans

March 13, 2014

Alien planets circling the most common stars in the universe may often have strange lobster-shaped oceans on their surfaces, researchers in China now say.

Super-Earths have long-lasting oceans

January 5, 2015

For life as we know it to develop on other planets, those planets would need liquid water, or oceans. Geologic evidence suggests that Earth's oceans have existed for nearly the entire history of our world. But would that ...

Recommended for you

STEREO—10 years of revolutionary solar views

October 26, 2016

Launched 10 years ago, on Oct. 25, 2006, the twin spacecraft of NASA's STEREO mission – short for Solar and Terrestrial Relations Observatory – have given us unprecedented views of the sun, including the first-ever simultaneous ...

Image: Changing colors in Saturn's pole

October 26, 2016

These two natural color images from NASA's Cassini spacecraft show the changing appearance of Saturn's north polar region between 2012 and 2016.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Feb 09, 2015
However, the day sides of these super-Earths would dry out completely only if they received less geothermal heat from volcanic activity than Earth, and had 10 percent of the amount of water on Earth's surface or less. Similar results were seen with Earth-sized planets.

in general you'd expect more water on a more massive planet assuming "habitable Zone" temperatures, so a dry scenario at those temperatures becomes unlikely just due to convection. Also in general a super-Earth would be expected to stay hot longer both due to accretion heat and radioactive heat because it has a higher volume-to-surface area ratio. This also means more time for water and gases to bake out of the rocks to make even deeper oceans and thicker atmospheres.

These model results are consistent with my expectations, although they don't seem to have mentioned much about the behavior of the deepest oceans in "water worlds" for boundaries between nutrients in exotic ice formations.
1 / 5 (3) Feb 09, 2015
You expect higher winds on a super-earth due to mountains being smaller (stronger gravity makes it harder to build mountains). Therefore continental plains are flatter and larger relative to land mass. I've thought about these scenarios a lot, and for human activity it really does become completely impractical to try to live with any conceivable technology on a planet above about 2g, so the fact they modeled 0.5mass to 4mass is very good to me. 4 masses, assuming similar composition and density, gives 1.68g and predicts 4 times the surface water on a planet with about 3 times the surface area and smaller mountains and less high continents. therefore you would have some land "somewhere", assuming an earth-like history, but most of the planet would be expected to be covered by massive oceans.

I think this could support life because there will be oceans "somewhere" which aren't deep enough to produce exotic ices, therefore available nutrients.
1 / 5 (3) Feb 09, 2015
More mass means stronger magnetic field (potentially) and stronger gravity. This means it is harder for two reasons for solar winds to strip away hydrogen from the atmosphere. This means you would expect that not only does the planet start with more water per unit surface area (surface to volume problem in spheres), but that it also maintains a higher percentage of it's water for any given duration.

They assumed tidally locked because thatis a worst case scenario, so if they got positive results on a tidally locked planet we would certainly expect positive results on a non-locked planet.

I really don't like where things start to go when mass gets above 4 Earths and into the 8 Earths range, seems to predict "uninhabitable for humans, but microbial life and aquatic life might survive there" sort of scenarios, because even if you start with the same composition you get planets with absurd oceans and atmospheres.
1 / 5 (4) Feb 09, 2015
Mainstream science gets one step closer to understanding why the pagans worshipped Saturn. Has anybody thought yet to compare the ratio of isotopes for water on Saturn with those on Earth? We've already observed that they don't match for the Sun and Earth ...
5 / 5 (5) Feb 09, 2015
"when a planet orbits very near a star, the star's gravitational pull can force the world to become "tidally locked" to it."

FWIW: Yes, but as Mercury show there ought to be a good likelihood that the planet end up in a resonance instead.

And in fact when people model Mercury, the end result is a resonance in ~30 % of the cases, and the planet will then slowly rotate.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 10, 2015
In a fluid model of gravity, it's entirely possible that a density gradient in the fluid could actually cause an orbiting body to rotate, even as the tidal forces would want to slow it's rotation, so that a "full stop" scenario might not happen as quickly.

I wonder if they modeled extreme axial tilts like Uranus, and also model retrograde spins like Venus, to see how big of a difference it makes (globally) for planets with otherwise same mass and composition? We know it would produce more extremes, but we don't know exactly what the "middle ground" behavior would look like because we only have one example of such a planet in our SS, and it's not in the habitable zone.
Feb 10, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet Feb 13, 2015
Could the build up of ice destabilise a tidally locked planet? I'd naively expect that if sufficient ice-mass built up on the night side then it would potentially reach a tipping point where the planet would want to tip over.

I also wonder, how cold would it get on the far side, would atmospheric gasses start to freeze out? It seems plausible that CO2 might start to freeze out for instance.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.