'Safer' pesticide could create toxic mercury, study says

Aug 19, 2014
A farmer sprays pesticide on a rice field as the sun sets in Santa Fe, central Philippines on February 17, 2014

A compound in pesticides that replaced another banned for its harmful effects, may threaten humans and wildlife by reacting with mercury in natural water to form a toxic chemical, researchers said Tuesday.

Methyl iodide (CH3I) has been registered as a fumigant in several countries, "although its environmental impacts are not well understood," a team from the United States and China reported in the journal Nature Communications.

It replaces methyl bromide, phased out under the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the Earth-shielding ozone layer.

For the latest study, researchers probed the behaviour of the new compound, which was approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a fumigant in 2008, and since registered in several countries including Japan and New Zealand.

Compared with methyl bromide, degraded more slowly in soil and thus had a higher chance of ending up in natural water via runoff, the researchers said.

Once there, it could interact under sunlight with mercury to form methylmercury, they showed in lab experiments using pond water.

Methylmercury is the most dangerous and toxic form of mercury, and damages the brain and immune system. It can accumulate in fish.

"Fumigants are widely applied in agricultural fields to control pests and weeds," the researchers wrote, adding that with the phase-out of , use of methyl iodide was expected to increase "dramatically".

"This study shows that CH3I could also indirectly threaten the health of humans and wildlife by forming a (methyl mercury), suggesting the necessity of a more comprehensive risk assessment of CH3I as a ," they said.

Explore further: How do we combat strawberry crop pathogens?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Scientists study how to improve pesticide efficiency

Feb 29, 2012

In 2007, a controversial pesticide was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use on fruit and vegetable crops, mainly in California and Florida. Farm workers and scientists protested the approval of the pesticide ...

Caution urged in storing methyl bromide-treated produce

Aug 01, 2011

Operators of facilities that store or process crops treated with methyl bromide should take extra precautions to protect their workers from postharvest exposure to the fumigant, advise experts at UC Davis, the California ...

How do we combat strawberry crop pathogens?

Jul 04, 2014

A microscopic fungus that kills up to one million strawberry plants each year in WA strawberry farms is the focus of research which aims to eliminate the need for chemical fungicides in crops.

Alternatives to ozone-depleting pesticide studied

May 07, 2008

Methyl bromide, an odorless, colorless gas used as an agricultural pesticide, was introduced in the 1980s as an effective way to control weeds and increase fruit yields. Agricultural production nurseries around ...

Pesticide regulation in California is flawed, UCLA report says

Sep 23, 2013

Approximately 30 million pounds of fumigant pesticides are sprayed on valuable California crops each year—strawberries, tomatoes, peppers and the like—in an attempt to control pests. Responsibility for the safety of pesticides ...

Recommended for you

Implications for the fate of green fertilizers

7 hours ago

The use of green fertilizers is a practice that has been around since humans first began growing food, but researchers are warning that modern techniques for the creation of these fertilizers could have implications ...

Ditching coal a massive step to climate goal: experts

8 hours ago

Phasing out coal as an electricity source by 2050 would bring the world 0.5 degrees Celsius closer to the UN's targeted cap for climate warming, an analysis said on the eve of Tuesday's UN climate summit.

Monitoring heavy metals using mussels

11 hours ago

A research team in Malaysia has concluded that caged mussels are useful for monitoring heavy metal contamination in coastal waters in the Strait of Johore. Initial results indicate more pollution in the eastern ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LariAnn
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
Typical EPA boondoggle - ban something that is mildly problematic and approve something to replace it that is far more toxic and dangerous - way to go, EPA, really going out of your way to protect us! [/sarc]
Toiea
not rated yet Aug 19, 2014
Methyl iodide is also more expensive = less environmentally friendly and it's acute toxicity (neurotoxicity, methylation agent) is higher (it kills many beneficial organisms in soil). IMO as a good fumigant could serve the methyl bisulfate or dimethycarbonate.
Rustybolts
not rated yet Aug 20, 2014
I'm glad I only got 30 more years on this rock. It's being destroyed by stupid people with College degrees at a alarming rate. We would have been better off if we never left the stone age. I can't wait to see the environmental disaster fracking will cause. This is going to be the grand dad of them all. Just keep looking the other way while they inject the planet with toxins. More smart people hard at work.