New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

August 22, 2014

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's School of Energy Resources (SER) Institute for Carbon Management.

But proposed regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency aimed at restricting emissions from fossil-fueled actually discourage the development of the essential and internationally needed technologies to achieve large global reductions in , through capture and storage of carbon dioxide from power plants and other large stationary sources of CO2, writes SER consultant L.D. Carter.

The paper notes that reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have concluded that strategies to achieve large global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are only practical with effective and affordable carbon capture and . But such technologies are not ready for commercial application at coal-fired power plants, and a move to natural gas power generation wouldn't generate sufficient CO2 emissions reductions.

A more effective approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions would be to ramp up federal spending on carbon capture research and development, Carter argues. The paper suggests several ways to generate revenue for such research.

There also should be an aggressive effort to use existing, cost-effective technologies to reduce the release of two non-CO2 pollutants projected to significantly heat the atmosphere—black carbon and methane—the paper suggests.

History indicates that it will take at least five to 10 more years for the EPA's new standards for emissions from new and existing power plants to be finalized and litigated, Carter says.

"The five to 10 years of legal uncertainty will surely inhibit investment in the development of technological solutions," he writes. "Neither the American economy, those people genuinely concerned about or the energy industry can risk waiting five to 10 years before developing needed technologies. In particular, America cannot wait if reasonable commercial ( and storage) technology is to be available for deployment in the next decade."

Explore further: Coal more risky than renewables

More information: The paper is available online at www.uwyo.edu/ser/.

Related Stories

Coal more risky than renewables

September 5, 2013

Coal-fired electricity may have little or no economic future in Australia, even if carbon capture and storage becomes commercially available, a new analysis has found.

Drivers would pay extra to cut carbon emissions

September 20, 2013

Most drivers are willing to pay for onboard technology that will reduce carbon emissions, as well as sacrifice some fuel economy and storage space, in order to cut greenhouse gases resulting from combustion engines, say University ...

Britain wins carbon capture funding from EU

July 8, 2014

A coal-burning power plant in Yorkshire is to receive 300 million euros in EU funds to develop a new way of keeping polluting carbon emissions out of the atmosphere, the EU said Tuesday.

Regulations only a first step in cutting emissions

July 29, 2014

Intensifying calls for action on climate change have led to a variety of proposed regulations to cut greenhouse gas emissions from specific sources of the economy, including, most recently, the environmental protection agency's ...

Recommended for you

New study sheds light on end of Snowball Earth period

August 24, 2015

The second ice age during the Cryogenian period was not followed by the sudden and chaotic melting-back of the ice as previously thought, but ended with regular advances and retreats of the ice, according to research published ...

Earth's mineralogy unique in the cosmos

August 26, 2015

New research from a team led by Carnegie's Robert Hazen predicts that Earth has more than 1,500 undiscovered minerals and that the exact mineral diversity of our planet is unique and could not be duplicated anywhere in the ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
5 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2014
We do not need carbon capture, we need renewables. Capturing the carbon takes much of the energy from the process, and still leaves many other toxic components.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.