New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

Aug 22, 2014

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's School of Energy Resources (SER) Institute for Carbon Management.

But proposed regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency aimed at restricting emissions from fossil-fueled actually discourage the development of the essential and internationally needed technologies to achieve large global reductions in , through capture and storage of carbon dioxide from power plants and other large stationary sources of CO2, writes SER consultant L.D. Carter.

The paper notes that reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have concluded that strategies to achieve large global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are only practical with effective and affordable carbon capture and . But such technologies are not ready for commercial application at coal-fired power plants, and a move to natural gas power generation wouldn't generate sufficient CO2 emissions reductions.

A more effective approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions would be to ramp up federal spending on carbon capture research and development, Carter argues. The paper suggests several ways to generate revenue for such research.

There also should be an aggressive effort to use existing, cost-effective technologies to reduce the release of two non-CO2 pollutants projected to significantly heat the atmosphere—black carbon and methane—the paper suggests.

History indicates that it will take at least five to 10 more years for the EPA's new standards for emissions from new and existing power plants to be finalized and litigated, Carter says.

"The five to 10 years of legal uncertainty will surely inhibit investment in the development of technological solutions," he writes. "Neither the American economy, those people genuinely concerned about or the energy industry can risk waiting five to 10 years before developing needed technologies. In particular, America cannot wait if reasonable commercial ( and storage) technology is to be available for deployment in the next decade."

Explore further: Replacing coal and oil with natural gas will not help fight global warming

More information: The paper is available online at www.uwyo.edu/ser/.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Regulations only a first step in cutting emissions

Jul 29, 2014

Intensifying calls for action on climate change have led to a variety of proposed regulations to cut greenhouse gas emissions from specific sources of the economy, including, most recently, the environmental ...

Britain wins carbon capture funding from EU

Jul 08, 2014

A coal-burning power plant in Yorkshire is to receive 300 million euros in EU funds to develop a new way of keeping polluting carbon emissions out of the atmosphere, the EU said Tuesday.

Drivers would pay extra to cut carbon emissions

Sep 20, 2013

Most drivers are willing to pay for onboard technology that will reduce carbon emissions, as well as sacrifice some fuel economy and storage space, in order to cut greenhouse gases resulting from combustion engines, say University ...

Coal more risky than renewables

Sep 05, 2013

Coal-fired electricity may have little or no economic future in Australia, even if carbon capture and storage becomes commercially available, a new analysis has found.

Recommended for you

New challenges for ocean acidification research

18 hours ago

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

Compromises lead to climate change deal

19 hours ago

Earlier this month, delegates from the various states that make up the UN met in Lima, Peru, to agree on a framework for the Climate Change Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris next year. For ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
5 / 5 (1) Sep 10, 2014
We do not need carbon capture, we need renewables. Capturing the carbon takes much of the energy from the process, and still leaves many other toxic components.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.