Wikipedia blocks 'disruptive' edits from US Congress

Jul 25, 2014
Wikipedia has blocked editing rights from some computers at the US House of Representatives in response to "disruptive" revisions of the online encyclopedia

Wikipedia has blocked editing rights from some computers at the US House of Representatives in response to "disruptive" revisions of the online encyclopedia.

A 10-day ban imposed Thursday blocked any editing from an IP address at the US Capitol, which is shared among a number of computers.

"You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for persistent disruptive editing," a Wikipedia posting said.

The move came after unusual revisions were pointed out by Twitter account @congressedits, which describes itself as "a bot that tweets anonymous Wikipedia edits that are made from IP addresses in the US Congress."

The account was created by a software developer named Ed Summers.

Some of the changes, which were later undone, said that John F. Kennedy's assassin Lee Harvey Oswald acted "on behalf of Fidel Castro" and that the news blog Mediaite was "sexist" and "transphobic."

While Wikipedia allows users to contribute and edit entries, it also monitors for unverified or unsubstantiated comments.

A notice posted on one of the anonymous entries from Congress said: "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia... Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed.

"Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism."

A spokeswoman at the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, pointed out that the block only applies to a single IP address, not all computers located in Congress.

"The Wikipedia community is the arbiter of administrative decisions related to community editorial policies," spokeswoman Katherin Maher said in an email.

"In this case, the decision was made by a member of the English Wikipedia community, based on their assessment that the IP address in question was being used for disruptive editing. Wikipedia English has a behavioral guideline against disruptive editing."

Explore further: UC Berkeley hires first Wikipedian-in-residence (Update)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Realtime map shows Wikipedia changes worldwide

May 14, 2013

(Phys.org) —The show of shows: A realtime map that you can watch, and watch, which displays where in the word people are editing articles for Wikipedia. We are almost tempted to issue a warning here that ...

Most Wikipedia health articles contain errors

May 28, 2014

(HealthDay)—Ninety percent of health articles on Wikipedia contain errors, according to a new study published in the May issue of the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

Recommended for you

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

Dec 18, 2014

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

UN General Assembly OKs digital privacy resolution

Dec 18, 2014

The U.N. General Assembly has approved a resolution demanding better digital privacy protections for people around the world, another response to Edward Snowden's revelations about U.S. government spying.

Online privacy to remain thorny issue: survey

Dec 18, 2014

Online privacy will remain a thorny issue over the next decade, without a widely accepted system that balances user rights and personal data collection, a survey of experts showed Thursday.

Spain: Google News vanishes amid 'Google Tax' spat

Dec 16, 2014

Google on Tuesday followed through with a pledge to shut down Google News in Spain in reaction to a Spanish law requiring news publishers to receive payment for content even if they are willing to give it away.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

adam_russell_9615
4.5 / 5 (2) Jul 25, 2014
Not going to name names?
Dr_toad
Jul 25, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
supamark23
5 / 5 (2) Jul 25, 2014
Not enough room here to do that. How many ill-informed and downright stupid politicians are there?


In the words of the internet, "over 9000"
Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2014
Surely y'all are familiar with the Million Monkey Theorem, here brought to life in the US Congress-critters with their millions of Crackberry keyboards. Their conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense; two agreeing is not consensus.
JohnGee
5 / 5 (3) Jul 25, 2014
Their conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense

Doug, don't talk about yourself like that.
alfie_null
5 / 5 (3) Jul 26, 2014
This single IP address, shared by a number of computers - in other words a bunch of machines NATted behind some sort of firewall. Could someone make a FOIA request to winnow out which machine (or machines) are the source?

Alll this activity should be in the open. Hard to imagine any good reason it should be kept secret from the electorate.
btb101
not rated yet Jul 26, 2014
this shows certain areas of government are desperate to control the past.
he who controls the past, controls the present.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.