Harsh space weather may doom potential life on red-dwarf planets

Jun 02, 2014
This artist's conception shows a hypothetical alien world orbiting a red dwarf star. Although it is in the star’s habitable zone, this planet faces an extreme space environment that is stripping its atmosphere and generating powerful aurorae. Since they are subjected to such harsh physical conditions, red-dwarf planets may not be habitable after all, so life in the universe might be even rarer than we thought. Credit: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

(Phys.org) —Life in the universe might be even rarer than we thought. Recently, astronomers looking for potentially habitable worlds have targeted red dwarf stars because they are the most common type of star, comprising 80 percent of the stars in the universe. But a new study shows that harsh space weather might strip the atmosphere of any rocky planet orbiting in a red dwarf's habitable zone.

"A planet faces an extreme space environment, in addition to other stresses like tidal locking," says Ofer Cohen of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA).

Cohen is presenting their findings today in a press conference at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

Earth is protected from solar eruptions and space weather by its . Just like the shields of the Starship Enterprise, Earth's magnetic field deflects incoming energy blasts. We also are protected by distance since Earth orbits 93 million miles from the Sun.

Red dwarf stars are smaller and cooler than the Sun. To be in the star's , where the temperature is warm enough for liquid water, a planet would have to be much closer to its star than the Earth is to the Sun. As a result, such a planet would be subjected to severe space weather.

Previous work has looked at the impact of stellar flares from a red dwarf on a nearby planet. In contrast, the new research examines the effect of the red dwarf's constantly blowing stellar wind. The team used a computer model developed at the University of Michigan to represent three known red-dwarf circling a simulated, middle-aged red dwarf.

They found that even an Earth-like magnetic field could not necessarily protect a habitable-zone world from the star's continuous bombardment. Although there were moments when the planet's magnetic shields held firm, it spent far more time with weak shields than strong shields.

"The space environment of close-in exoplanets is much more extreme than what the Earth faces," explains co-author Jeremy Drake (CfA). "The ultimate consequence is that any planet potentially would have its atmosphere stripped over time."

The extreme also would trigger spectacular aurorae, or Northern Lights. The aurora on a red-dwarf planet could be 100,000 times stronger than those on Earth, and extend from the poles halfway to the equator.

"If Earth were orbiting a red dwarf, then people in Boston would get to see the Northern Lights every night," adds Cohen. "Oh the other hand, we'd also be in constant darkness because of tidal locking, and blasted by hurricane-force winds because of the dayside-nightside temperature contrast. I don't think even hardy New Englanders want to face that kind of weather."

Explore further: Every red dwarf star has at least one planet

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Red dwarf stars could strip away planetary protection

Jul 02, 2013

(Phys.org) —Red dwarf stars are the commonest type of stars, making up about 75% of the stars in our Galaxy. They are much smaller and much less massive than our Sun and for that reason a lot dimmer. If ...

Exoplanet aurora: An out-of-this-world sight

Jul 21, 2011

Earth's aurorae, or Northern and Southern Lights, provide a dazzling light show to people living in the polar regions. Shimmering curtains of green and red undulate across the sky like a living thing. New ...

Every red dwarf star has at least one planet

Mar 04, 2014

Three new planets classified as habitable-zone super-Earths are amongst eight new planets discovered orbiting nearby red dwarf stars by an international team of astronomers from the UK and Chile.

Recommended for you

Lives and deaths of sibling stars

19 hours ago

This beautiful star cluster, NGC 3293, is found 8000 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Carina (The Keel). This cluster was first spotted by the French astronomer Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille in ...

Fermi finds a 'transformer' pulsar

Jul 22, 2014

(Phys.org) —In late June 2013, an exceptional binary containing a rapidly spinning neutron star underwent a dramatic change in behavior never before observed. The pulsar's radio beacon vanished, while at ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hemitite
not rated yet Jun 02, 2014
I wonder if a potentially habitable moon around a gas giant in a red dwarf's habitable zone could be shielded from the harsh space weather by its host planet's much stronger magnetic field? That may also help mitigate the tidal locking situation as that moon would be tidally locked with the gas giant and so still "rotating" with respect to the star.
Rufusaurus
not rated yet Jun 02, 2014
Maybe there are metal rich planets around red dwarf's that would have strong magnetic fields.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
not rated yet Jun 02, 2014
Meh.

I don't think atmosphere stripping constrains habitability much more than the CMEs or tidal lock risks do, since in all cases you want superEarths with their potentially larger atmosphere and stronger magnetic fields. That shields against radiation, dampens and prolong atmosphere stripping, and spread the heat (cmp nearly locked Venus, which have winds you can stand in which still spreads the heat between the sides).

FWIW, tidal lock risks are overrated. Mercury isn't locked, and simulations makes the seen 3:2 resonance the most likely outcome for it.

And since many stars are in binaries, and they recently found out that it dampens stars including M stars (less CME et cetera), many of these stars are quite reasonable systems to start with.

Unless I am mistaken, M stars are still the best stars to look for life around.
Adam
not rated yet Jun 02, 2014
The study referred to is available as a preprint on arXiv.org, as are several of the other news items. Contra the sensationalist spin, the preprint is more inconclusive, pending further analysis and modelling of atmosphere evolution.