New facial recognition apps concern researcher

February 4, 2014 by Angie Hunt

Brian Mennecke is not surprised to see developers using facial recognition technology to create new apps for smart phones and tablets. In fact, Mennecke and his colleagues at Iowa State University predicted this would happen through their research on 'mavatars,' or marketing avatars.

Mennecke, an associate professor of information systems, says creates opportunities, but there are also risks. Privacy invasion, identity theft and misuse are among the top concerns, specifically with peer-to-peer applications. And trying to safeguard one's privacy or identity is similar to fighting a war on terror, Mennecke said.

He points to the upcoming release of the Name Tag as a good example. The app allows users to take a picture of a stranger and find information about that individual by scanning pictures on social media sites and other online sources.

"Our research focuses on the perceived risks and the potential for misuse by other users with this kind of technology. The challenge is that when these applications are released for public use, the potential for abuse is great because it will be virtually impossible to opt out," Mennecke said.

That's not to say all facial recognition apps are necessarily bad. It really depends on who's accountable. For example, apps that are connected to a business or organization will ultimately be accountable to their customers, stockholders and regulators. Mennecke says that's not always the case with peer-to-peer applications.

"The challenge with peer-to-peer applications is that there will ultimately be no one entity to hold responsible," Mennecke said. "In many ways, there is an analogy to military operations; when a military force opposes another army, everyone knows who is on each side. When anyone can run rogue facial recognition applications on their own, it is more like a war on terror because any one individual doesn't know whether someone is using for good or bad and, ultimately, there is no one organization that can be held accountable."

Explore further: Privacy, technology face off again

Related Stories

Privacy, technology face off again

September 30, 2012

The tension between new technology and individual privacy is as old as Silicon Valley. Each advance that allows or impels us to share information or seek windows into others' lives is scary at first. Often the fears blow ...

In your face: Near-infrared glasses thwart face recognition

January 21, 2013

(—People generally like the idea of facial recognition technology, if they are asked about it in the context of identifying dangerous killers on the loose and people out to spread mayhem. People generally hate ...

Facial-recognition technology proves its mettle

May 24, 2013

( —In a study that evaluated some of the latest in automatic facial recognition technology, researchers at Michigan State University were able to quickly identify one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects from ...

Recommended for you

Xbox gaming technology may improve X-ray precision

December 1, 2015

With the aim of producing high-quality X-rays with minimal radiation exposure, particularly in children, researchers have developed a new approach to imaging patients. Surprisingly, the new technology isn't a high-tech, high-dollar ...

Making 3-D imaging 1,000 times better

December 1, 2015

MIT researchers have shown that by exploiting the polarization of light—the physical phenomenon behind polarized sunglasses and most 3-D movie systems—they can increase the resolution of conventional 3-D imaging devices ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.