Archaeologists lend long-term perspective to food security and climate shock

Feb 16, 2014 by Margaret Nelson

What role does pre-existing vulnerabilities play for people who experience a climate shock? Does it amplify the effects of the climate shock or is effect negligible? Four Arizona State University archaeologists are looking into this as part of an international team examining how people can be most resilient to climate change when it comes to food security.

The group questioned whether vulnerability to food shortages prior to a climate shock – not the actual experience of the – is related to the scale of impact of that shock. They found a strong relationship.

The team used long-term archaeological and historical data from the North Atlantic Islands and the U.S. Southwest to form the basis of their understanding of changing dynamics in these areas. Each case in their study included information on evolving social, political and economic conditions over centuries, as well as .

The extended timeframe and global scope allowed them to witness changes in the context of vulnerabilities and climate challenges on a wide scale.

"The pattern is so consistent across different regions of the world experiencing substantially different climate shocks, that the role of vulnerability cannot be ignored," said Margaret Nelson, an ASU President's Professor in the School of Human Evolution and Social Change.

Nelson made her comments today (Feb. 16) at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago.

The other ASU archaeologists involved in the study are professors Keith Kintigh, Michelle Hegmon and Kate Spielmann, all of the School of Human Evolution and Social Change in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.

Their findings support the argument for focusing on reducing vulnerabilities to climate shocks to boost resilience, which will ultimately lead to fewer required recovery efforts when crises occur. Nelson said that most often disaster management does not address vulnerabilities prior to shocks but instead focuses on returning a system to its previous condition following a disaster.

"Exposures to challenges and other environmental risks are not the sole causes of disasters," she says. "People have unintentionally built vulnerabilities through decisions and actions in social, political and economic realms."

Explore further: Hot issues in climate change research to be debated at AAAS Annual Meeting

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Southwest pueblo-dwellers key to modern climate policy?

Feb 19, 2012

Vulnerability to climate change presents policy challenges to local, state, regional, national and international entities, particularly at a time when the public and policy-makers still struggle conceptually with the complexities ...

Recommended for you

FACT CHECK: Both sides in Keystone XL debate bend facts

11 hours ago

Supporters of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would run from Canada to the Gulf, say the privately funded, $8 billion project is a critically needed piece of infrastructure that will create thousands of jobs ...

Sao Paulo warns of severe water rationing

13 hours ago

Authorities in Sao Paulo, Brazil's richest state and economic hub, have warned they are considering severe water rationing if the country's worst drought in 80 years continues.

Refineries challenge EPA plan to cut emissions

15 hours ago

A rule proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency that aims to curb emissions from oil refineries and petrochemical manufacturers is causing tensions to flare between the agency and industry groups. The agency is reviewing ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mayday
5 / 5 (1) Feb 16, 2014
Isn't this all just a little bit obvious? Did someone miss pre-school the day the teacher told the nursery story about the little mouse that stashed away food for winter while his friend saved nothing? In the natural world, every winter is a "climate shock," isn't it? There is much to be learned from observing the strategies of winter's survivors. That being said, I am very glad that the general conversation on climate is shifting to talk about intelligent preparations and adaptations rather than trying to prevent the climate from changing. Has anyone out there yet been able to find a significant period in Earth's history when the climate wasn't changing? Just askin'.
Howhot
not rated yet Feb 16, 2014
Has anyone out there yet been able to find a significant period in Earth's history when the climate wasn't changing? Just askin'.

The real question in a different frame is; 'When in Earth's history has the climate changed so rapidly'? The only time you will find are after major comet strikes or super volcano(s). But current industrial man-made climate change doesn't carry the cooling aerosols of those type of catastrophic events. This current era of global warming (only 50-100 years old) is purely on mankind shoulders and specifically the USA (with China catching up fast). The amount of CO2 created in the past 100 from fossil fuel pollution is staggering compared to natural forces.


TegiriNenashi
not rated yet Feb 17, 2014
Rabid climax change -- is it new bogey man? Why increasing temperature by 1 degree over a century is any more problematic than increasing/decreasing 1 degree over 10000 years?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.