A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions.
The theory, called "orchestrated objective reduction" ('Orch OR'), was first put forward in the mid-1990s by eminent mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose, FRS, Mathematical Institute and Wadham College, University of Oxford, and prominent anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, MD, Anesthesiology, Psychology and Center for Consciousness Studies, The University of Arizona, Tucson. They suggested that quantum vibrational computations in microtubules were "orchestrated" ("Orch") by synaptic inputs and memory stored in microtubules, and terminated by Penrose "objective reduction" ('OR'), hence "Orch OR." Microtubules are major components of the cell structural skeleton.
Orch OR was harshly criticized from its inception, as the brain was considered too "warm, wet, and noisy" for seemingly delicate quantum processes. However, evidence has now shown warm quantum coherence in plant photosynthesis, bird brain navigation, our sense of smell, and brain microtubules. The recent discovery of warm temperature quantum vibrations in microtubules inside brain neurons by the research group led by Anirban Bandyopadhyay, PhD, at the National Institute of Material Sciences in Tsukuba, Japan (and now at MIT), corroborates the pair's theory and suggests that EEG rhythms also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations. In addition, work from the laboratory of Roderick G. Eckenhoff, MD, at the University of Pennsylvania, suggests that anesthesia, which selectively erases consciousness while sparing non-conscious brain activities, acts via microtubules in brain neurons.
"The origin of consciousness reflects our place in the universe, the nature of our existence. Did consciousness evolve from complex computations among brain neurons, as most scientists assert? Or has consciousness, in some sense, been here all along, as spiritual approaches maintain?" ask Hameroff and Penrose in the current review. "This opens a potential Pandora's Box, but our theory accommodates both these views, suggesting consciousness derives from quantum vibrations in microtubules, protein polymers inside brain neurons, which both govern neuronal and synaptic function, and connect brain processes to self-organizing processes in the fine scale, 'proto-conscious' quantum structure of reality."
After 20 years of skeptical criticism, "the evidence now clearly supports Orch OR," continue Hameroff and Penrose. "Our new paper updates the evidence, clarifies Orch OR quantum bits, or "qubits," as helical pathways in microtubule lattices, rebuts critics, and reviews 20 testable predictions of Orch OR published in 1998 – of these, six are confirmed and none refuted."
An important new facet of the theory is introduced. Microtubule quantum vibrations (e.g. in megahertz) appear to interfere and produce much slower EEG "beat frequencies." Despite a century of clinical use, the underlying origins of EEG rhythms have remained a mystery. Clinical trials of brief brain stimulation aimed at microtubule resonances with megahertz mechanical vibrations using transcranial ultrasound have shown reported improvements in mood, and may prove useful against Alzheimer's disease and brain injury in the future.
Lead author Stuart Hameroff concludes, "Orch OR is the most rigorous, comprehensive and successfully-tested theory of consciousness ever put forth. From a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions."
The review is accompanied by eight commentaries from outside authorities, including an Australian group of Orch OR arch-skeptics. To all, Hameroff and Penrose respond robustly.
Penrose, Hameroff and Bandyopadhyay will explore their theories during a session on "Microtubules and the Big Consciousness Debate" at the Brainstorm Sessions, a public three-day event at the Brakke Grond in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, January 16-18, 2014. They will engage skeptics in a debate on the nature of consciousness, and Bandyopadhyay and his team will couple microtubule vibrations from active neurons to play Indian musical instruments. "Consciousness depends on anharmonic vibrations of microtubules inside neurons, similar to certain kinds of Indian music, but unlike Western music which is harmonic," Hameroff explains.
Explore further:
Study Rules Out Fröhlich Condensates in Quantum Consciousness Model
More information: "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory," by Stuart Hameroff, MD, and Roger Penrose, FRS. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002
Commentaries on the review are:
"Reply to criticism of the 'Orch OR qubit'–'Orchestrated objective reduction' is scientifically justified," by Stuart Hameroff, MD, and Roger Penrose, FRS; dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.00
"Reply to seven commentaries on "Consciousness in the universe: Review of the 'Orch OR' theory," by Stuart Hameroff, MD, and Roger Penrose, FRS. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002

AGreenhill
5 / 5 (8) Jan 16, 2014Noumenon
5 / 5 (4) Jan 16, 2014El Cid
5 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014That would be discovery enough in itself.
And although it is potentially connected to questions of consciousness (presuming even the vaguest notions of a meaning for that term), wouldn't the current work (or review, I'm not sure) be more properly characterized as 'compatible' or 'not incompatible' with Penrose et al's model of the origins of consciousness while neither confirming nor disconfirming it?
Noumenon
3.8 / 5 (4) Jan 16, 2014More than that. That there are QM effects operative at the just sub-neuron scale.
In "emperor's new mind" Penrose put forwrd the idea that the mind may be non-algorithmic and non-computable, though deterministic, so he was against strong-A.I. And he suggested that QM effects may play a role in consciousness. Lator, with Hameroff they focused on these "microtubles" in neurons. They received a lot of criticism that QM could even be operative at that scale in the brain. Glad to see this result.
Certainly true, but the criticisms were overwhelming and this will stick in their crawl.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014Otto_Krog
1 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014I say that particles doesn't exist, and that the mind and consciousness can be described as wave structures from the beginning of time.
http://www.crestroy.com
Nestle
5 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (5) Jan 16, 2014The review adds new experiments, which are indeed based on "vibrations" (AC measurements), but are not tied to quantum effects and even less coherence except by H&P saying so - it is pattern recognition pseudoscience. And it adds new theory, where H&P avoid Tegmark's find that quantum decoherence in molecules are much too fast to couple to nerve impulses, by proposing unobserved atomic scale oscillations driven by electrons moving atomic nuclei around [!].
I note that the consensus is that "The biochemical mechanism of action of general anesthetics is not yet well understood." But that they interact with receptors which could be expected. [Wikipedia] The experiments that H&P refer to is seems to be on how the drugs binds to other proteins too (say, microtubules). [Paywalled, and life is too short for that shit.]
[tbctd]
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014This is not neuroscience, obviously. "Physics of Life Reviews" is a journal on physics in living systems. Also notable is that they get criticism from mostly philosophers and woo peddlers [Chopra!] but that the chemists claims H&P proposal "is not scientifically justified".
The neuroscience view was presented the other day. It is claimed that neuroscientist Graziano's theory that builds on biology is the first to tackle both the easy (conscious, when) and hard (conscious, how) problems of consciousness. [ http://medicalxpr...ess.html ]
@El Cid: That is the long and the short of it.
@Otto: Unfortunately, "digging" it doesn't affect that it is non-evidenced. I "undig" gravity if I fall and hurt myself, yet it exists.
@Nestle: It has become a veritable dog and pony show, yes.
Microtubules on the other hand has an already known function, they are motorized skeletons of eukaryote cells. If they weren't there, then it would be a mystery.
Returners
not rated yet Jan 16, 2014I don't think the mind is deterministic. Sure there are drugs which influence us, as can chemical imbalances obviously. At the risk of sounding strange, I'd say "partially deterministic" might be acceptable, given the nature of drugs and intoxicants.
To say that the mind is entirely deterministic seems to contradict the notion of what a mind is. I can choose to wear a red shirt or a blue shirt, and I can even change my mind after I have made a choice.
Does anyone genuinely believe that is just about number crunching, nano-scale chemical stimuli, etc, and "destined" to happen?
If consciousness is deterministic, then none of you are actually any more intelligent than a rock. You just think you are.
Returners
4.5 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014So....Are you saying a biochemical structure can't have more than one function?
Nestle
3 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014Nestle
3 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014Nestle
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014Hameroff is influenced with idea of cellular automata of Wolfram and he speculates, the surface proteins of microtubules are doing calculations at their molecular level. Again, I consider these ideas far fetched and speculative, as I can see very weak evidence for it. But it may be possible, that microtubules are able to work like memristors in certain extent. What the axon needs to do is to increase its conductivity during more frequent runs of neural spikes, so that the surface proteins of microtubules may spontaneously rearange in such a way, they do represent lower impedance for these spikes.
Nestle
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014Nestle
5 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014But the experiments have demonstrated, that the presence of the quantasome
particles in chloroplast membrane is not a necessary condition for photoreduction activity of chloroplasts. In prokaryotes pigments are distributed uniformly on or in the thylakoid lamellae - and their quantum efficiency is just by seven percent lower.
Nestle
3 / 5 (2) Jan 16, 2014Nestle
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 16, 2014AmritSorli
1 / 5 (2) Jan 17, 2014Brain is only a medium through consciousness acts in physical world,
but conscioisness itself is non-material.
http://www.amazon...92129593
rkolter
5 / 5 (2) Jan 17, 2014Whydening Gyre
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 17, 2014It may not be energy in "known" sense, but it is derived from quantifiable energy. Subsequently, it will use the same rules. It's relativity, in that everything is a step in an entropic process. To think that our "consciousness" is the final product of that process is just, well, narcissistic.
barakn
3 / 5 (2) Jan 18, 2014They do have microtubules. I'm not sure what piece of information your brain has mangled, Zephir - perhaps that invertebrates don't have myelin.
Nestle
not rated yet Jan 18, 2014Eikka
5 / 5 (1) Jan 18, 2014This notion is supported by many other arguments, like the famous Chinese Room argument that points out all algorithms reduce to something we recognize as not intelligence, so that there either is no intelligence at all or intelligence must be something non-computable.
But the argument as the article puts out just ranks of crank science through vague terminology. Use vague enough words and you can claim you're right whatever turns up. Vibrations and helical patterns, and transverse waves through quantum ethers and so forth.
Nestle
not rated yet Jan 18, 2014edward_ponderer
5 / 5 (2) Jan 20, 2014Beyond Orch OR, there seems to be a resonance here with Robert Lanza's Biocentrism theory. And indeed, noting that the vessel of reduction would itself be a reduction--one wonders at the multifaceted gem born of the same light it sparkles with.