Should nature's benefits matter to business?

Dec 11, 2013 by Kristi Foster

Overuse and under payment of natural resources is costing businesses the earth – literally.

Global primary economic activities generate unaccounted costs of US$7.3 trillion per year – equivalent to 13% of global economic output in 2009 – primarily through greenhouse gas emissions, land conversion, pollution, depletion of natural resources, waste and their associated damage and health costs.

If high impact sectors – including coal-fired power, cattle ranching and cement production – accounted for the social costs of their environmental damage and unsustainable use, they would they would make an economic loss.

Such is the scale of the hidden multi trillion dollar 'natural capital risk' facing businesses, investors and society.

Natural capital – the stock of capital derived from natural resources such as biodiversity, ecosystems and services they provide – underpins economies globally but is declining at an alarming rate. Business operations that have negative environmental impacts can have high, but often unrecognised costs and risks.

A new briefing paper produced by Fauna & Flora International (FFI), through the Natural Value Initiative, in partnership with KPMG and ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants), targets businesses interested in understanding natural capital as a business risk and 'material' issue.

Should nature’s benefits matter to business?
For some high impact sectors, the damage impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution-related health care would erase business profits if costed. Credit: Juan Pablo Moreiras/FFI.

Materiality defines the point at which information becomes relevant to the users of corporate reports. Key stakeholders such as investors still largely judge corporate performance on the basis of measures of financial materiality.

The paper, Identifying natural capital risk and materiality, shows that materiality definitions are expanding to incorporate environmental and social issues such as natural capital, stakeholder groups such as NGOs and local communities, and longer-term effects on natural capital. With many regulators and sustainability reporting bodies broadening their frameworks to integrate these changes, natural capital issues and risks are more likely to be included by companies in reporting and decision-making.

Corporations, investors, accountancy professionals and governments alike are now recognising that the trend of declining natural capital is tied to a range of risks for business, from greater resource competition, to stiffer regulations, to increasing barriers to finance.

Incorporating natural capital issues in corporate materiality and risk assessments offers a range of benefits and value to companies: from better-informed decision making by an organisation and its stakeholders, to an enhanced and more comprehensive risk management process, to an increased ability to gain competitive advantage.

Some companies are already recognising natural capital as a long-term risk: Brazilian agribusiness BRF Brasil links the natural capital risk associated with deforestation in the Amazon rainforest to risk in their supply chain, while Tyson Foods Inc. relates natural capital risks to their operations and financial performance.

Should nature’s benefits matter to business?
By incorporating natural capital issues in risk assessments, companies can make informed decisions, better manage risks and gain competitive advantage. Credit: Juan Pablo Moreiras/FFI.

"Responsible investors are increasingly considering natural capital a material business concern and more and more want to see portfolio companies, particularly in high risk sectors, stay alert of how these – otherwise hidden – business risks might implicate their financial performance," said Cecilia Repinski, Director of the Natural Value Initiative of FFI.

Directed at business leaders, Chief Financial Officers and accounting professionals, the paper is the first in a series of short briefing papers that follow up on the 2012 report Is natural capital a material issue? An evaluation of the relevance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to accountancy and the private sector.

Explore further: Mixed result on sustainability reporting, but ASX proposes greater disclosure

More information: Read the full briefing paper: www.accaglobal.com/content/dam… ateriality-paper.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Marcellus drilling boom may have led to too many hotel rooms

Sep 18, 2014

Drilling in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale region led to a rapid increase in both the number of hotels and hotel industry jobs, but Penn State researchers report that the faltering occupancy rate may signal that there are ...

Entrepreneurs aren't overconfident gamblers

Sep 17, 2014

Leaving one's job to become an entrepreneur is inarguably risky. But it may not be the fear of risk that makes entrepreneurs more determined to succeed. A new study finds entrepreneurs are also concerned about what they might ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

peterpalms
not rated yet Dec 11, 2013
Our socio- economic system is exhausting our resources and collapse is inevitable. Planned intrinsic obsolescence is a vital part of every marketing plan in this anti-economic system. Product sustainability is inverse to economic growth



Two hour free video

The Fall of Republic

http://www.youtub...OTc-7shU]http://www.youtub...OTc-7shU[/url]

http://www.youtub...OTc-7shU]http://www.youtub...OTc-7shU[/url]

Tel: 425 827-5528 if line busy call and leave message at 425 828-6774

THE UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IS THE ENTIRE ECONOMY



In a decaying Society Art if it is truthful

Must also reflect decay

And unless it wants to break faith with its social function

Art must show the world as changeable

And help to change it



Click here to view this free film

http://Zeitgeistmovingforward 2011



This is a feature length documentary work which presents a case for a transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society.

It includes presentations by

Dr. Robert Zapolsky Neurological
Dr. Gabor Mate Physician
Dr. Richard Wilkenson Social Epidemology
Dr. James Gilligan Director Harvard Center of Study of Violence
Dr. John Murtry Professor Emeritus Guelp
Michael Ruppert Investigative Journalist




This subject matter transcends the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and moves to relate the core, empirical "life ground" attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a "Resource-Based economy. Change is inevitable , because the socioeconomic monetary system itself is exhausting our planet's resources eliminating its ability to support life and poverty is killing more people than all the wars combined.

The socioeconomic monetary paradigm is dependent upon consumption which industrialization is eliminating because it is eliminating labor in manufacturing and housing , which consequently is eliminating the ability to consume because it is eliminating wages. The socioeconomic monetary paradigm is self destructive because it keeps trying to support consumption by printing money, thereby causing inflation . The socioeconomic monetary paradigm wastes natural resources by manufacturing planned obsolescence, creating vast garbage dumps of valuable metals and minerals. We will run out of natural resources if we do not change to a resource based economy which will provide for all the people without use of money



THEATRICAL RELEASE - Zeitgeist: Moving Forward was released in 60+ countries and in 25+ languages on January 15th 2011. This large scale release was not associated with any major distributor.

DVD/INTERNET RELEASE - This is a non-commercial project, which means it is available for free acquisition via internet in both viewing form and full DVD download. We also have a discounted DVD available.
rockwolf1000
not rated yet Dec 12, 2013
It doesn't matter how the economy works. There are way too many people on this planet drawing resources and generating waste. That is a fact and is also the bottom line no matter how corporations, economists, and accountants wish to spin it.