Norway abandons carbon capture and storage plan

September 20, 2013
Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg after the television debate during an Election Night event on September 9, 2013 in Oslo, Norway.

Norway said Friday it was abandoning its much-touted plans to capture carbon dioxide and store it underground to prevent emissions from escaping into the atmosphere.

The , launched in 2007 by Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg amid much fanfare, has encountered numerous delays and cost overruns.

The plan was to capture and store CO2 emissions from the Mongstad in western Norway and its adjoining gas plant as of 2014.

Stressing the importance of the project in the fight against global warming, Stoltenberg likened it in importance to a Moon landing.

But his government, currently in its final days in power after losing September 9 legislative elections, has now decided to bury the entire project.

Costs have escalated and the project had been delayed until 2020.

"At both the national and international level, the development of technologies to capture and store CO2 has taken longer, been more difficult and more costly than expected," Oil and Energy Minister Ola Borten Moe told reporters.

Applying the technology developed for Mongstad at other sites would also have been difficult, he said.

The Norwegian Office of the Auditor General this week criticised the government's inability to keep the cost of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in check.

The government has spent 7.4 billion kroner (924 million euros, $1.25 billion) between 2007 and 2012, including 1.2 billion kroner for Mongstad.

Environmentalists criticised Oslo's decision.

"This government is leaving office covered in shame," the head of environmental group Bellona Frederic Hauge said.

"This is eight years lost in the fight against climate change," he told TV2 Nyhetskanalen television.

Explore further: Summit Group announces bid to build carbon capture and storage plant in Scotland

Related Stories

EU carbon capture projects lost: MEP

December 6, 2012

All European projects this year for the capture and storage of carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas blamed for global warming, have fallen through, EU sources said Thursday.

Drivers would pay extra to cut carbon emissions

September 20, 2013

Most drivers are willing to pay for onboard technology that will reduce carbon emissions, as well as sacrifice some fuel economy and storage space, in order to cut greenhouse gases resulting from combustion engines, say University ...

Recommended for you

Climate ups odds of 'grey swan' superstorms

August 31, 2015

Climate change will boost the odds up to 14-fold for extremely rare, hard-to-predict tropical cyclones for parts of Australia, the United States and Dubai by 2100, researchers said Monday.

Quantifying the impact of volcanic eruptions on climate

August 31, 2015

Large volcanic eruptions inject considerable amounts of sulphur in the stratosphere which, once converted into aerosols, block sun rays and tend to cool the surface of the Earth down for several years. An international team ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lurker2358
3 / 5 (10) Sep 20, 2013
"At both the national and international level, the development of technologies to capture and store CO2 has taken longer, been more difficult and more costly than expected,"


Unfortunately, the U.S. is planning on doing this same nonsense. Apparently planners just ignore the real costs of buying land with appropriate geology, paying for fuel for transport of the CO2, etc, etc.
Chromodynamix
2.7 / 5 (7) Sep 20, 2013
It's a complete non starter. Besides the costs Lurker has mentioned, it is estimated 30% of the energy derived from generating CO2 has to be used to pump it underground.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.