says connectivity's a human right ... but is that wrong?

Sep 03, 2013 by John Lenarcic, The Conversation
Two thirds of the world’s population do not have internet access … yet. Credit: Judy

You may have seen the recent ten-page whitepaper, bearing the imprimatur of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. It heralds an initiative for the greater good that may very well change the world as we know it.

The proposal – "Is connectivity a human right?" – outlines the plans of a commercial consortium, including tech companies such as Samsung, Nokia, Qualcomm and Ericsson, to provide low-cost internet access to the planet's poorest nations.

The project's website states: is a global partnership between technology leaders, nonprofits, local communities and experts who are working together to bring the internet to the two thirds of the world's population that don't have it.

(The fact that much of this proportion of non-users may also not have access to the basic necessities, such as clean running water, is not lost – but that's for a completely different article.)

So, will this really be free access to the internet?

Not necessarily so, and probably not. Infrastructures that permit the exchange of free information still cost money.

Public libraries may be free to readers but their operation is usually paid for through council rates, city taxes or other miscellaneous . (Incidentally, freely-accessible public toilets are a pro bono technology that are conspicuous by their absence in many large American cities.)

Let's look at how other schemes with similar sentiments have had varying degrees of success.

Low cost, low data, high innovation

The three chief platforms of are , efficiency and the development of innovative at an indigenous level to help sustain the low costs of operation.

Given that principle project partners include tech giants in the mobile phone arena, this would suggest advances in these technologies could be deployed to spread the reach of low-cost, low-data intensive internet access in with less than user-friendly geographic conditions.

Spoken Web is one innovative technology designed to enable illiterate and underprivileged users to experience internet connectivity via mobile phones.

A Bangladeshi organisation provides technology and education to isolated river communities in Northern Bangladesh by converting indigenous boats into schools, libraries, and computer centres. Credit: Gates Foundation

Developed by IBM Research in India in 2010, this system facilitated the creation of linked "VoiceSites", using even modest phone apparatuses that had the potential to weave "spoken" information networks.

It may not have been high-speed broadband but Spoken Web networks dealt with local constraints to mirror something close to accepted internet functionality to those who would have had none.

The initiative is also aware of such bandwidth limitations and is prepared to invest in research and development to improve the efficiency of data compression and network capabilities for environmental extremes in remote and chaotic locales.

No doubt this would be a win-win proposition as the discovery of efficiency gains for outlier regions could also be migrated for optimal use in tech deployment within a conventional urban milieu.

Another consortium for web improvement is the not-for-profit Internet. Founded in 1996, it is primarily a coalition of university researchers with the goal developing new protocols facilitating applications that require very high bandwidth as well as very low while taking into consideration controlled delays emergent in signal processing along the way.

The new proposal would appear to be riding on this long wave of innovation but also seeking out low-cost options for web usability that are elegant in their simplicity while still having enough grunt for basic access needs.

Big ideas

Most likely the plan of Zuckerberg and company is for cheap accessibility to information for the masses, and not creating an easy portal for downloading huge amounts of audio-visual data.

In a sense, it is a scheme to give the world a global library that all can share.

In recent times, strategies for low-cost provision of internet access have been touted by other leading tech luminaries, such as Skype co-founder Niklas Zennström and Kim Dotcom of Megaupload fame, in addition to Google's Project Loon, launched in June this year, which aims to dole out broadband for all via floating servers in the sub-stratosphere.

Kim Dotcom's eccentric scheme of free, low-data internet access for domestic residences in New Zealand was to be subsidised with funds won from lawsuits against Hollywood and the US government that the disgruntled ex-Megaupload chief was intending to mount.

Google’s Project Loon plans to provide internet access to the 4.7 billion people who currently can’t access the web via a ring of huge balloons circling the globe. Credit: AAP/Google/Andrea Dunlap

The Zennstrom-backed FreedomPop, founded in 2011, claims to be the first US wireless internet service provider to have pledged the delivery of "100% free" fourth-generation (4G) mobile broadband internet access to its subscribers.

But it would appear to be more of a freemium model with users being given 500MB of data gratis – anything above is presumably subject to a fee. But this would probably be sufficient for basic information access and the FreedomPop liberation mantra is similar to the new ethos, namely that "the internet is a right, not a privilege".

A retrospective look

When television was first invented, it too was seen as a potential force for the greater good through public education and the freemium model also arose in its use, primarily for entertainment in the long run.

In retrospect, though, could one also have said that television is a right?

Critics of claim that the "greater good" pitch is one that would ultimately add more to Facebook's coffers.

If it does improve democratic access will it be to a "walled garden" on the internet governed by Facebook? This is the same, for example, as a radio station giving away receivers that are tuned only to their particular frequency. That would be restricting competition.

Facebook is still a generic conduit to information. From an ethical vantage, cynicism regarding could perhaps be subdued if happiness increases for those denied entry to any kind of digital domain.

As the old saying goes, any journey must begin with a single step, however humble that may be.

Explore further: Facebook aims to get the world online (Update 2)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Facebook aims to get the world online (Update 2)

Aug 21, 2013

Food, water and the Internet? Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wants to get all of the world's 7 billion people online through a partnership with some of the largest mobile technology companies. He says the Web ...

70% of Americans have high-speed Internet

Aug 26, 2013

The percentage of Americans with high-speed Internet connections at home has reached 70 percent, while just three percent still use dial-up to go online, a study showed Monday.

Recommended for you

Quantenna promises 10-gigabit Wi-Fi by next year

20 hours ago

( —Quantenna Communications has announced that it has plans for releasing a chipset that will be capable of delivering 10Gbps WiFi to/from routers, bridges and computers by sometime next year. ...

Tech giants look to skies to spread Internet

Apr 16, 2014

The shortest path to the Internet for some remote corners of the world may be through the skies. That is the message from US tech giants seeking to spread the online gospel to hard-to-reach regions.

Wireless industry makes anti-theft commitment

Apr 16, 2014

A trade group for wireless providers said Tuesday that the biggest mobile device manufacturers and carriers will soon put anti-theft tools on the gadgets to try to deter rampant smartphone theft.

Dish Network denies wrongdoing in $2M settlement

Apr 15, 2014

The state attorney general's office says Dish Network Corp. will reimburse Washington state customers about $2 million for what it calls a deceptive surcharge, but the satellite TV provider denies any wrongdoing.

Netflix's Comcast deal improves quality of video

Apr 14, 2014

Netflix's videos are streaming through Comcast's Internet service at their highest speeds in the past 17 months now that Netflix is paying for a more direct connection to Comcast's network.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2013 was here.
2.1 / 5 (7) Sep 24, 2013
Off course it cannot be a right since someone else will be forced by the govt to pay for that 'right'.
A legitimate right can be defined by the absence of the violation of another right to protect the legitimate right.
Health care cannot be a right since the state must violate the property rights of people to 'provide' health care.
1 / 5 (3) Sep 25, 2013
NESTLÉ says drinking water is not a human right. Try enjoying your Internet without that!

@ryggie Why can't doctors sell unnecessary organs the patient refuses to put on the free market? It only seems fair

More news stories

Sony's PlayStation 4 sales top seven million

Sony says it has sold seven million PlayStation 4 worldwide since its launch last year and admitted it can't make them fast enough, in a welcome change of fortune for the Japanese consumer electronics giant.

Robotics goes micro-scale

( —The development of light-driven 'micro-robots' that can autonomously investigate and manipulate the nano-scale environment in a microscope comes a step closer, thanks to new research from the ...

Biologists help solve fungi mysteries

( —A new genetic analysis revealing the previously unknown biodiversity and distribution of thousands of fungi in North America might also reveal a previously underappreciated contributor to climate ...