Research duo confirm that yes, people do blush in the dark

Sep 06, 2013 by Bob Yirka weblog
Credit: Denise Wächter and Wolter Seuntjens

(Phys.org) —Confirming a suspicion held by many dedicated scientists throughout the world, that no attribute of the world around us, or indeed inside of us should go unanalyzed, a pair of researchers has tested and proven that human beings truly are capable of blushing while sitting in a dark room. The pair, Denise Wachter of the University of Erfurt in Germany and Wolter Seuntjens of the Dutch Academy of 'Pataphysics (field of philosophy dedicated to studying what lies beyond the realm of metaphysics) found using a single volunteer and a thermographic camera, that given the right set of circumstances, a young woman can be made to blush in a completely dark room, and that when she does so it can be evidenced as blood rushing to her cheeks.

News of this important discovery comes courtesy of Improbable Research, which has very graciously agreed to print the paper written by the pair of researchers. IR, known for awarding Ig Nobel prizes for research efforts that have for one reason or another gone unappreciated by other more established journals has yet to decide apparently, if the paper "Blushing in the Dark: First Experimental Proof" will be considered for such an esteemed reward.

The authors claim that mankind has been fascinated for centuries by the question of whether people can blush in the dark, because well, if it happens, it's too dark for anyone to see. The thinking is that blushing, the authors report, is a type of , similar perhaps to coughing when uncomfortable or jiggling one's legs when nervous. Thus, it would make little sense for a person to blush in the dark if no one is able to witness the act. But that has not stopped people from wondering. Apparently such notables as Darwin pondered the question, only to conclude that he was willing to believe the claims of a certain nameless young woman with whom he as keeping company in a very dark room.

At any rate, Wachter and Seuntjens decided to settle the question once and for all. They enlisted the assistance of a willing 31 year old woman who claimed she had a tendency to blush easily. The researchers sat her in a dark room where they took an initial baseline thermographic image of her face. The volunteer was then asked to make herself blush—she did so by recounting an embarrassing tale from her past (no details of that past event were revealed, unfortunately). At the end of story, the woman vocally reported that she was feeling herself blush. The researchers jumped into action, taking new thermographic images of the woman's face, without haste. In comparing the two images, the researchers noted that more heat was present in the cheeks of the woman during the time she claimed to be blushing, proving once and for all, that yes, people really are able to blush in the dark.

Explore further: Physicists suggest possible existence of other kinds of dark matter

Related Stories

Study finds night owls more likely to be psychopaths

Aug 01, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—People who stay up late at night are more likely to display anti-social personality traits such as narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathic tendencies, according to a study published ...

New Mexican skies protected with Dark Sky Park designation

Sep 02, 2013

The 34,000-acre Chaco Culture National Historical Park is home to many ancient wonders including the remains of a civilization that thrived over 1,000 years ago. The park, which has been protecting its archaeological ...

Recommended for you

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Apr 18, 2014

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

Apr 17, 2014

A statistical analysis of the gift "fulfillments" at several hundred online wedding gift registries suggests that wedding guests are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to buying an appropriate gift for the ...

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

Apr 17, 2014

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Creative activities outside work can improve job performance

Apr 16, 2014

Employees who pursue creative activities outside of work may find that these activities boost their performance on the job, according to a new study by San Francisco State University organizational psychologist Kevin Eschleman ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Humpty
1.8 / 5 (10) Sep 07, 2013
And what next?

Rain falling from a cloud, can evaporate part way down?

Shitting when constipated has a higher probability of bursting blood vessels in the brain?

Tidal zones conduct water?

Birds get altitude sickness at 100,000 feet?
Gmr
1 / 5 (3) Sep 07, 2013
Serious question, because the concept of whether or not you think you're being observed has quite a few psychological effects, and to that end I'm not sure they answered their own question, crazily enough. To properly do a control, they should enlist people for a study unrelated to blushing to establish a baseline for obliquely observing when people blush and what from, and present those same stimuli in the dark for observation without telling the participants what they are looking for, or perhaps even letting them know they are observed.
Sinister1811
1.7 / 5 (6) Sep 07, 2013
Wow, I could've told them this.

New findings confirm that the sky is blue.
Noumenon
2.2 / 5 (13) Sep 07, 2013
Their next project is in determining whether or not animals kiss.
Gmr
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 07, 2013
Franklins,
The article linked to is an opinion piece by a philosopher of science. There is nothing there other than his opinion on "duh" science. In the meantime, some of those things mentioned as "duh" science are not. Alzheimers can afflict episodic memory and leave some skills and learned abilities intact. Does it include driving, a life skill, which can be a combination of learned skill (the actions of driving) and some semi-episodic memory (where to go, corners, turns, construction and so-on)? Could you use repeated driving infractions, if they are affected, as a potential screening for Alzheimers? Should an early diagnosis mean suspending someone's license as a precaution, as is sometimes done with people who experience uncontrolled seizures or narcolepsy?

More news stories

Clippers and coiners in 16th-century England

In 2017 a new £1 coin will appear in our pockets with a design extremely difficult to forge. In the mid-16th century, Elizabeth I's government came up with a series of measures to deter "divers evil persons" ...

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.