White man's skull has Australians scratching heads

Jul 01, 2013
A centuries-old skull found in northern New South Wales in late 2011, in Canberra. The skull of a white man is raising questions about whether Captain James Cook really was the first European to land on the country's east coast.

The centuries-old skull of a white man found in Australia is raising questions about whether Captain James Cook really was the first European to land on the country's east coast.

The skull was found in northern New South Wales in late 2011, and police initially prepared themselves for a gruesome .

But scientific testing revealed that not only was it much older than expected, but possibly belonged to a white man born around 1650, well before Englishman Cook reached the eastern seaboard on the Endeavour in 1770.

"The DNA determined the skull was a male," Detective Sergeant John Williamson told The Daily Telegraph.

"And the report states the skull is that of a Caucasoid aged anywhere from 28 to 65."

Australian National University expert Stewart Fallon, who carbon-dated the skull, pulling some from the bone as well as the enamel on a tooth, said he was at first shocked at the age of the relic.

"We didn't know how old this one was, we assumed at first that it was going to be a very young sample," he told AFP.

"When we first did it we weren't really thinking about people coming to Australia and things like until we started to look at the dates and say, 'Oh, that's becoming intriguing'."

Australian National University's Dr Stewart Fallon holds a skull found in northern New South Wales in late 2011, in Canberra, July 1, 2013.

He said the test used was quite accurate for dates after 1950 but for earlier samples it was more difficult, and the two samples yielded different dates—though both were within the error range.

"Using them (the dates) together we can do some modelling as to what we expect the calendar age to be ... and the way it works out by using those two dates is that we get about an 80 percent probability that the person was born somewhere around the 1650s and died somewhere between 1660 and 1700," Fallon said.

He said there was a 20 percent probability the skull, which was found well-preserved and intact but without any other remains near the Manning River, belonged to someone born between 1780 to 1790 who died between 1805 and 1810.

Historians were cautious.

"Before we rewrite the history of European settlement we have to consider a number of issues, particularly the circumstances of the discovery," archaeologist Adam Ford told the Telegraph.

"The fact the skull is in good condition and found alone could easily point to it coming from a private collection and skulls were very popular with collectors in the 19th century."

Cassie Mercer, editor of Australia And New Zealand Inside History, said the "could be an incredible find".

"I guess it's a very exciting find because it could open up a whole lot of avenues of history that we haven't been able to explore before," she told AFP.

Dutch explorers made the earliest European landings in Cape York in Australia's far north and western Australia in the 1600s.

Explore further: Remains of French ship being reassembled in Texas

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Tiny ancient bandicoot shines light on future

May 20, 2013

(Phys.org) —A 20 million-year-old fossil skull identified as a 'pocket-sized' ancestor of the bandicoot will give insights into the future of Australia's modern endangered animals.

Mastodon skull discovered in Chile

May 18, 2011

A perfectly preserved skull of a mastodon -- a relative of today's elephant -- was found here during excavation work at a water treatment plant, one of the scientists involved in the discovery said Tuesday.

Skull found in Britain 'could be King Richard III'

Feb 04, 2013

British archaeologists hunting for the lost remains of King Richard III have revealed the first image of a battle-scarred skull found at a car park ahead of what they said would be a "major announcement" ...

'Hitler' skull belonged to woman: scientists

Sep 29, 2009

A skull fragment thought to come from Adolf Hitler is in fact that of an unidentified woman, according to a US study that has resurrected questions about the Nazi leader's death.

Indian surgeons reconstruct baby's swollen head

Jun 27, 2013

Indian doctors said Thursday they have successfully completed a second round of reconstructive surgery on the skull of a baby suffering from a rare disorder that caused her head to nearly double in size.

Recommended for you

Remains of French ship being reassembled in Texas

Oct 24, 2014

A frigate carrying French colonists to the New World that sank in a storm off the Texas coast more than 300 years ago is being reassembled into a display that archeologists hope will let people walk over ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Bob_Kob
3 / 5 (7) Jul 01, 2013
Somone brought it in?
mark_paxtonmacrae
5 / 5 (2) Jul 01, 2013
"He said the test used was quite accurate for dates after 1950 ... "

It's the other way around. Carbon Dating's "present" in "before present" is set at 1950 because all the weapons testing that took place after 1950 changed the intake of C-14 among any living organics.

mark_paxtonmacrae
5 / 5 (1) Jul 01, 2013
Re; above comment. I tried to add a couple of pages as references but my comment then wouldn't pass the spam filter.

Please see ' c 14 dating dot com ' for a fairly detailed reference.
bmorrow492
5 / 5 (1) Jul 02, 2013
I wonder if they are attempting DNA analysis. That may answer some of the questions about this person.
Sinister1811
1 / 5 (3) Jul 02, 2013
It could be a hoax. Maybe one of the Dutch explorers got lost or separated and became stranded? Also, what happened to the rest of the skeleton? This is interesting.
monkeyboy666
1 / 5 (1) Jul 02, 2013
"He said there was a 20 percent probability the skull, which was found well-preserved and intact but without any other remains near the Manning River, belonged to someone born between 1780 to 1790 who died between 1805 and 1810."

So there is a 20% chance it is a man who arrived and died at a time after Europeans started colonizing the place? I think there is probably less to this story than it seems.
pedrocarlosalves
1 / 5 (3) Jul 04, 2013
The Portuguese arrived in Australia before 1550.
Strangely those "researchers" didn't consider this.
Why?
Humpty
2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 08, 2013
It's Jesus - reincarnating as a bandicoot, except his head was too big for the body and he died again.