Kepler stars and planets are bigger than previously thought

June 5, 2013
Using a galaxy similar to our own Milky Way, we show the scale of the distances for the sample of stars with planet candidates described in this press release. The circled dot represents the position of the sun in the Milky Way, and the stippled cone shows how far away the new candidate stars are (2800-7000 light years), compared to the size of our galaxy. Credit: NOAO/AURA/NSF

(Phys.org) —In a new study using the NOAO Kitt Peak National Observatory Mayall 4-meter telescope, observations of a large sample of stars with candidate planets identified by the NASA Kepler Mission have revealed that many of the stars, and hence their planets, are actually somewhat larger than originally thought. In addition, the researchers confirm that planets larger than Neptune are more likely to be found orbiting stars that contain more heavy elements (such as iron) than the Sun. Small planets, however, have been discovered around stars both rich and poor in metals.

Over three years ago, Steve B. Howell (NASA Ames Research Center) put together a team to investigate and characterize the stars that the NASA Kepler Mission found to host . The team members are Mark Everett and David Silva (both at NOAO) and Paula Szkody (University of Washington).

"One of the main findings of this initial work," said Everett, who leads this study, "is that our observations indicate that most of the stars we observed are slightly larger than previously thought and one quarter of them are at least 35% larger. Therefore, any planets orbiting these stars must be larger and hotter as well. By implication, these new results reduce the number of candidate Earth-size planet analogues detected by Kepler."

The Kepler mission, a telescope in orbit around the sun, measures how much a star dims when a planet candidate crosses in front of it. The amount of dimming reveals the relative sizes of the star and its candidate planet. The research team used the amount of dimming combined with new measurements of the sizes of the stars to determine that the are larger than previously thought.

While approximate sizes of most of the host stars were previously known from the star's colors and brightness, spectra reveal far more. The team acquired spectra using the large, ground-based, Mayall 4-meter telescope located near Tucson, Arizona. Their observations were made over 48 nights covering the last several years.

"While Kepler is the discovery machine, it takes both Earth-based and space-based telescopes to truly understand exoplanets and how they relate to the stars they orbit," says Silva (NOAO Director and one of the co-investigators of this study)

To date, more than 300 stars have been observed at the Mayall 4-meter from the long list identified by Kepler as hosts of potential exoplanets (referred to as Kepler Objects of Interest, or KOIs). The sample contained more faint stars, with distances ranging from 2800 to over 7000 light years, than previous ground-based studies (Fig. 1 shows the scale of these distances). Such faint KOIs host the majority of high-priority, Earth-size candidate planets identified so far by Kepler. Spectra of these stars were obtained, and compared with theoretical models, to determine more accurate stellar radii, temperatures, and metallicity (i.e., the relative amount of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium in each star). In all, these stars are thought to harbor more than 360 exoplanet candidates. To date, this study represents the largest and faintest uniform sample of spectroscopically characterized exoplanet host stars in the Kepler field of view.

"Determination of accurate stellar sizes allows astronomers to more accurately identify which exoplanets are Earth analogs, fulfilling a key goal of the Kepler mission," said Howell (Kepler Project Scientist).

The team plans to make more ground-based spectral observations as there remain over 1,000 Kepler Objects of Interest with small planet candidates to observe in this magnitude range.

These new results will be published by astronomers Mark Everett (NOAO), Steve Howell (Kepler Project Scientist, NASA Ames Research Center), David Silva (NOAO), and Paula Szkody (University of Washington) in the Astrophysical Journal (in press, 2013arXiv1305.0578E).

Explore further: Kepler mission discovers 461 new planet candidates

Related Stories

Kepler mission discovers 461 new planet candidates

January 8, 2013

(Phys.org)—NASA's Kepler mission Monday announced the discovery of 461 new planet candidates. Four of the potential new planets are less than twice the size of Earth and orbit in their sun's "habitable zone," the region ...

Einstein's exoplanet

May 27, 2013

(Phys.org) —Eight hundred and eighty nine exoplanets (planets around stars other than our Sun) have been discovered to date. Most of them were found using the Kepler satellite, which spots small dips in a star's light as ...

How common are earths around small stars?

June 3, 2013

(Phys.org) —The Kepler mission has revolutionized the study of exoplanet statistics by increasing the number of known extrasolar planets and planet candidates by a factor of five, and by discovering systems with longer ...

Kepler provides insights into unusual dwarf star

June 3, 2013

(Phys.org) —Astronomer John Gizis of the University of Delaware, working with data obtained by the Kepler mission, is studying a highly unusual dwarf star and its powerful flares that may hold clues to the likelihood of ...

Recommended for you

Dense star clusters shown to be binary black hole factories

July 29, 2015

The coalescence of two black holes—a very violent and exotic event—is one of the most sought-after observations of modern astronomy. But, as these mergers emit no light of any kind, finding such elusive events has been ...

Image: Hubble sees a dying star's final moments

July 31, 2015

A dying star's final moments are captured in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The death throes of this star may only last mere moments on a cosmological timescale, but this star's demise is still quite ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Ophelia
5 / 5 (1) Jun 05, 2013
Anyone else think the scale on that cone is messed up by a large amount? As I understand it, the solar system is about 30,000 ly from the center of the Milky Way. That cone seems to put us at about 10,000 if the far end of the hatched area is about 7000 light years.
GSwift7
not rated yet Jun 05, 2013
I agree, the cone seems to be two or three times too big. The angle of the vertex seems correct though. So just chop off a bit more than half the cone and it should be about right.

Sign on the side of Kepler: "Warning, objects in mirror are larger than they appear."

If the difference in size was a random distribution, with equal numbers being larger and smaller than first calculated, then this would just be a refinement of the original estimates.

However, since the majority of objects were underestimated, this indicates a systematic or instrument related source of error. Such things, once discovered, can sometimes be corrected yielding surprising new findings in the original data set. It will be interesting to see if the same thing if found for the remainder of the Kepler data set.

That statistic about larger planets being more common around more metallic stars is interesting. No simple reason for that jumps out at me. Anyone have any ideas or references?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.